Proselytism and the Good Society: Why the Right to Share Religious Beliefs Should be Protected as a Fundamental Right
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(36)2024.ic-9Keywords:
proselytism, religious freedom, free speech, right to change religion, fundamental rightsAbstract
This article aims to analyse the reasons why the right to proselytism, as well as the correlative freedom to change religion, should be considered fundamental rights in the light of the United Nation system of Human Rights. The main idea is that these freedoms have always been considered contentious and, thus, have not received in International Law the legal protection they deserve, despite all the benefits they bring about, both for individuals and the society in general.
References
ADRAGÃO, Paulo Pulido. Levar a sério a Liberdade Religiosa: Uma Refundação Crítica dos Estudos sobre Direito das Relações Igreja-Estado. Coimbra: Almedina, 2012.
ALKIŞ, Mehmet. Rethinking the Debate on Universalism Versus Cultural Relativism Regarding Human Rights: The Case of China. Insan & Toplum: The Jounral of Humnaity and Society. Vol. 14, no. 1, 2024, pp. 46-59.
ALVES, Rodrigo Vitorino Souza. Diversidade Cultural e o direito à autodeterminação dos povos indígenas. Revista Jurídica da Presidência. vol. 16, n. 110, 2014, pp. 725-749. Available at: https://revistajuridica.presidencia.gov.br/index.php/saj/article/view/54/45
BABER, H. E. In defence of proselytizing. Religious Studies. Vol. 36, no. 3, 2000, pp. 333-344.
BERGER, Peter L. The Many Altars of Modernity: Toward a Paradigm for Religion in a Pluralist Age. Boston/Berlin, De Gruyter, 2014.
BIAZI, Chiara Antonia Sofia Mafrica. O conceito de proselitismo na jurisprudência da Corte Europeia dos Direitos Humanos: os casos Kokkinakis c. Grécia e Larissis e outros c. Grécia. Revista Direito em Debate.Vol. 21, no. 37, 2013, pp. 162-189 Available at: https://revistas.unijui.edu.br/index.php/revistadireitoemdebate/article/view/300
CHENEY, Ryan. The right to be proselytized under international law. Brigham Young University Law Review, vol. 49, n. 1, 2023, pp. 241-242, available at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3467&context=lawreview
CARUSO, Corrado. Dignità degli «Altri» e Spazi di Libertà degli «Intolleranti». Una Rilettura dell’Art. 21 Cost. Quaderni Costituzionali: Rivista Italiana di Diritto Costituzionale. 2013, vol. 33, n.º 4, pp. 795-822.
CONSELHO INDIGENSITA MISSIONÁRIO. Relatório – Violência contra os Povos Indígenas no Brasil. Dados de 2022. Available from: https://cimi.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/relatorio-violencia-povos-indigenas-2022-cimi.pdf
DANCHIN, Peter G. Of prophets and proselytes: freedom of religion and the conflict in international law. Harvard International Law Journal. Summer 2008, vol. 49, n. 2, pp. 249-321. Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/fac_pubs/505/
DAVIS, Dena S. Joining a “Cult”: Religious Choice or Psychological Aberration? Journal of Law and Health, vol. 11, n. 11, 1996, pp. 145-172. Available at: < https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1238&context=jlh>
FLORIA, Juan G. Navarro, LO PRETE, Octavio. Proselitismo y libertad religiosa: uma visión desde América Latina. Anuario de Derecho Eclesiástico del Estado. 2011, n.º 27, pp. 59-96, ISSN 0213-8123. Available from: https://www.boe.es/biblioteca_juridica/anuarios_derecho/abrir_pdf.php?id=ANU-E-2011-10005900096
GONZALEZ, Gérard. Prosélytisme: Droit International. In MESSNER, Francis, Dictionnaire: Droit des Religions. Paris: CNRS Éditions, 2010, pp. 615-610.
GRIM, Brian, FINKE, Roger. Religious Persecution in Cross-National Context: Clashing Civilizations or Regulated Religious Economies?. American Sociological Review. 2007, vol. 72, no. 3, 633-658. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epdf/10.1177/000312240707200407
HIRSCH, Moshe. The freedom of proselytism under the fundamental agreement and international law. Catholic University Law Review. Vol. 47, n.º 2, Winter 1998, pp. 407-425.
IANNACONE, Luca. Diritto di proselitismo e libertà religiosa: Note in margine al volume “El Derecho de Proselitismo Religioso en el Marco de la Libertad Religiosa” di Maria José Ciaurriz’. Archivio Giuridico Filippo Serafini, 2005, vol. 205, n.º 1, pp. 109-134.
INTROVIGNE, Massimo. El Hecho de la Conversión Religiosa. In: ALONSO, Juan; ALVIAR, José. Conversión Cristiana y Evangelización. Pamplona: EUNSA, 2011, pp. 359-383.
JENKINS, Laura Dudley. Legal limits on Religious conversions in India. Law and Contemporary Problems. Vol. 71, 2008, pp. 109-128. Available at: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/lcp/vol71/iss2/9
KAYAOGLU, Turan. The Organization of Islamic Cooperation’s Declaration on Human Rights: Promises and Pitfalls [Online]. Brooking Doha Center Publications. 2020 Available from: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/The-Organization-of-Islamic-Cooperations-declaration-on-human-rights-promises-and-pitfalls.pdf
KYMLICKA, Will. Multicultural Odisseys: Navigating the New International Politics of Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
LOPRIENO, Donatella. La Libertà Religiosa. Milano, Giuffrè Editore, 2009.
MACHADO, Jónatas E. M. Liberdade Religiosa numa Comunidade Constitucional Inclusiva. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 1996.
MALIK, Jamal. Fiqh al-Daʿwa: The emerging of standardization of Islamic proselytism. Die Welt des Islams. Vol. 58, no. 2, 2018, pp. 206-244.
MIRANDA, Jorge. Manual de Direito Constitucional. Tomo IV: Direitos Fundamentais. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 2008.
OCÁRIZ, Fernando. Evangelización, Proselitismo y Ecumenismo. Scripta Theologica, 2006, n.º 38, vol. 2, pp. 617-636. Available from: https://dadun.unav.edu/bitstream/10171/44329/1/11555-40271-1-PB.pdf
THE OSLO COALITION ON FREEDOM OF RELIGION AND BELIEF, Missionary activities and human rights: recommended ground rules for missionary activities [online]. November 2009. Available from: https://www.kirken.no/globalassets/kirken.no/migrering/km_7_1_6_12_oslokoalisjonen.pdf
SANTOS JUNIOR, Aloísio Cristovam. Proselitismo religioso no ambiente do trabalho: a busca por um justo equilíbrio entre a mordaça e o discurso abusivo. Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [online] July/December 2020, vol. 21, n.º 2, 523-550 E-ISSN 2179-7943. Available from: https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/20080/15793
FERRARI, Silvio. Proselytism and human rights. In WITTE, JR. John; GREEN, M. Christian. Christianity and Human Rights: An Introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010, p. 253-266.
PERRY, Michael J. Christianity and human rights. In WIITE, JR., John, ALEXANDER, Frank S., Christianity and Law: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
UM HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE. CCPR General Comment No. 22: Article 18 (Freedom of Thought, Conscience or Religion). 1993. Available at: https://www.refworld.org/legal/general/hrc/1993/en/13375
UM HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE. General Comment No. 34. Article 19 (Freedoms of Opinion and Expression). 2011. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/english/bodies/hrc/docs/GC34.pdf
WITTE JR., John. The Rights and Limits of Proselytism in the New Religious World Order. In BANCHOFF, Thomas, Religious Pluralism, Globalization and World Politics. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 105-122.
XANTHAKI, Alexandra. Indigenous rights in international law over the last 10 years and future developments. Melbourne Journal of International Law. Vol. 10, n. 1, 2009, pp. 27-37. Available at: https://law.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/1686060/Xanthaki.pdf
ZAGREBELSKY, Gustavo. Il Diritto Mite. Torino: Einaudi Editore, 1992.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Davide ARGIOLAS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who published in the journal agree to the following terms:
- The Authors grant the Journal the right of first publication, and other non-exclusive publishing rights, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of work with recognition of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (ex .: publish in an institutional repository or as a chapter in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (eg .: in institutional repositories or on their website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
RJP does not apply submission, publication or any other fees of any nature. Its articles are open access, with the goal of disseminating scientific knowledge and the debate of legal topics in the area of Legal Sciences.