Undervaluation of new technologies for mass tort redress in the light of the new european guidelines and their impact on Spanish Law
Keywords:
Collective actions; regulatory redress; consumer ombudsman.Más información sobre este texto de origen.Abstract
In late closing, Directive (EU) 2020/1828 of the European Parliament and of the Council, of November 25, 2020, on representation actions for the protection of the collective interests of consumers was approved. The main objective set by the Directive has been to ensure that consumers in all Member States have at least one process mechanism capable of effectively protecting their collective interests. However, his proposal is based on a highly ineffective litigation model of legal actions and has not been considered as a result of the experience accumulated in several Member States of proven effectiveness in time and results, such as regulatory redress and ombudsman. The transposition of the directive will sow important rights for state legislators whose ordinances have a less evolved mechanism of collective action than the design proposed by the community legislator, as in the Spanish case. Taking this path would be very compromised knowing that the reparation of the consumer who claims before the Spanish authorities can take a long time to materialize, a fact that alone convinces the "efficiency" proclaimed in the Directive on vacuum heat.
References
ESTEBAN DE LA ROSA, F., “El sistema español de resolución alternativa de litigios de consumo y la nueva Ley 7/2017, de 2 de noviembre», en ESTEBAN DE LA ROSA, F. (dir.), OLARIU, O. (coord.), La resolución de conflictos de consumo. La adaptación del Derecho español al marco europeo de resolución alternativa (ADR) y en Línea (ODR), Thomson Reuters/Aranzadi, Cizur Menor (Navarra), 2018. ISBN: 9788491775010.
Id., “Desafíos de la contratación electrónica para los sistemas de resolución alternativa de litigios de consumo: radiografía de una transformación necesaria”, VLEX, diciembre-2018.
Id., “El sistema español de arbitraje de consumo en la encrucijada: diagnóstico y claves para un nuevo diseño europeo”, en ÁLVAREZ GONZÁLEZ, S., ARENAS GARCÍA, R., DE MIGUEL ASENSIO, P.A., SÁNCHEZ LORENZO, S.A., STAMPA, G. (edts.), Relaciones transfronterizas, globalización y derecho, Thomson-Reuters/Civitas, Cizur Menor (Navarra), 2020. ISBN 978-84-1308-6.
CARBALLO PIÑEIRO, L., Las acciones colectivas y su eficacia extraterritorial, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, 2009.
GASCÓN INCHAUSTI, F., “Azioni collettive e azioni inibitorie per la protezione dei consumatori nel processo civile spagnolo: il ruolo delle associazioni deiconsumatori”, en Chiarloni, S. y Fiorio, P. (coords.), Consumatori e processo. La tutela degli interessi collettivi dei consumatori, Giappichelli, Turín, 2005.
Id., Tutela judicial de los consumidores y transacciones colectivas, Thomson Reuters, Cizur Menor (Navara), 2010.
Id., “Acciones colectivas y acciones de cesación para la defensa de los consumidores (arts. 53 a 56 TRDCU)”, en REBOLLO PUIG M. e IZQUIERDO CARRASCO, M. (dirs.), La defensa de los consumidores y usuarios. Comentario sistemático del Texto Refundido aprobado por Real Decreto Legislativo 1/2007, Iustel, Madrid, 2011.
FERRERES COMELLA, A., “Algunas pautas para regular adecuadamente las acciones colectivas, Actualidad Jurídica Uría Menéndez, núm. 45, 2017.
HODGES, CH., “From class actions to collective redress”, Civil Justice Quarterly, 2009.
HODGES, CH., “Collective redress in Europe: the new model”, Civil Justice Quarterly, 2010.
HODGES, CH., “Mass collective redress: Consumer ADR and regulatory techniques”, European Review of Private Law, 2015.
HODGES, CH., & VOET, S., Delivering collective redress: new technologies, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2018.
MORENO CORDERO, G., “La tutela alternativa en los conflictos colectivos de consumo: directrices del derecho europeo y orientaciones para un nuevo modelo en el sistema español”, en ESTEBAN DE LA ROSA, F. (dir.), OLARIU O (coord.), La resolución de conflictos de consumo. La adaptación del Derecho español al marco europeo de resolución alternativa (ADR) y en Línea (ODR), Thomson Reuters/Aranzadi, Cizur Menor (Navarra), 2018. ISBN: 9788491775010.
MARCHAL ESCALONA, N., El marco regulador en proyecto en España para la resolución alternativa de conflictos: ¿nuevas perspectivas para las reclamaciones de consumo?, REDI: Revista Española de Derecho internacional, 2019, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 148-149.
Id., Las relaciones entre las entidades de RAL de consumo y los sistemas judiciales en las reclamaciones transfronterizas: Especial referencia al proceso europeo de escasa cuantía, en ESTEBAN DE LA ROSA, F. (dir.), OLARIU, O. (coord.), La resolución de conflictos de consumo. La adaptación del Derecho español al marco europeo de resolución alternativa (ADR) y en Línea (ODR), Thomson Reuters/Aranzadi, Cizur Menor (Navarra), 2018. ISBN: 9788491775010.
VOET, S., “Cultural dimensions of group litigation: the Belgian case”. Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law, 2013.
VOET, S., “Consumer collective redress in Belgium: class actions to the rescue?”, European Business Organization Law Review, 2015.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who published in the journal agree to the following terms:
- The Authors grant the Journal the right of first publication, and other non-exclusive publishing rights, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of work with recognition of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (ex .: publish in an institutional repository or as a chapter in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (eg .: in institutional repositories or on their website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
RJP does not apply submission, publication or any other fees of any nature. Its articles are open access, with the goal of disseminating scientific knowledge and the debate of legal topics in the area of Legal Sciences.
