Surrogacy in Portugal: drawing insights from international practices

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(35)2024.ic-09

Keywords:

Surrogacy, Legal Implications, Ethical Implications, Comparative Law, Regulatory Framework, International Perspectives

Abstract

As Portugal prepares to implement surrogacy legislation, it enters a realm fraught with legal, ethical, and psychological complexities. Across the globe, jurisdictions exhibit diverse approaches to surrogacy, reflecting cultural, ethical, and legal diversity. This necessitates a comprehensive understanding of the implications of surrogacy within different legal systems. Moreover, the psychological impact on surrogates, intended parents, and offspring demands careful examination. As Portugal embarks on this journey, it must navigate ethical challenges, ensuring the protection of all parties involved. Furthermore, addressing research gaps and ethical dilemmas will be paramount in crafting legislation that upholds the rights and well-being of all individuals affected by surrogacy arrangements.

References

ATTAWET, Jutharat. Reconsidering surrogacy legislation in Thailand. Medico-Legal Journal, 2022, 90.1: 45-48.

BLAKE, Lucy, et al. “Gay fathers’ motivations for and feelings about surrogacy as a path to parenthood”, Human Reproduction, 2017, 32.4: 860-867. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex026.

BLYTH, Eric. “I wanted to be interesting. I wanted to be able to say ‘I've done something interesting with my life’”: Interviews with surrogate mothers in Britain, Journal of reproductive and infant psychology, 1994, 12.3: 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646839408408885

BRANDÃO, Pedro, GARRIDO, Nicolás. Commercial Surrogacy: An Overview - Gestação de substituição comercial: Uma visão global, Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia: Revista da Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, vol. 44,12 (2022): 1141-1158. doi:10.1055/s-0042-1759774.

BRAGA, Maria de Fátima Gonçalves. A Procriação Medicamente Assistida e os princípios constitucionais da igualdade e não discriminação, Revista Jurídica Portucalense, n.º Especial Mecanismos de Proteção Jurídica no Direito Civil., 2023, pp. 57-74, https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(ne)2023.ic-04

CABAR, Fabio Roberto, e.a., Critical Analysis of The Changes in CFM Resolution 2294/21 And Its Impacts on Assisted Human Reproduction, JBRA assisted reproduction, Vol. 26,4 659-665. 9 Nov. 2022, doi:10.5935/1518-0557.20220007

FINKELSTEIN, Alex, e.a, Surrogacy Law and Policy in the US. Columbia Law School Sexuality and Gender Law Clinic, 2016

GUIMARÃES, Maria Raquel, “Subitamente, no verão passado: A contratualização da gestação humana e os problemas relativos ao consentimento, Debatendo a procriação medicamente assistida, Porto, FDUP, 16, 17/03/2017, p. 114.

JADVA, Vasanti, et al., Surrogacy: the experiences of surrogate mothers, Human reproduction, 2003, 18.10: 2196-2204. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg397

KUMAR, Pawan, et al. Surrogacy and women′ s right to health in India: Issues and perspective. Indian journal of public health, 2013, 57.2: 65-70

MILLBANK, Jenni. The new surrogacy parentage laws in Australia: cautious regulation or'25 brick walls'?. Melbourne University Law Review, 2011, 35.1: 165-207.

NELSON, Erin L. Gestational surrogacy in Canada. Handbook of Gestational Surrogacy, 2016, 123-30.

OLAYE-FELIX, Bianca, ALLEN, Deborah Emma, METCALFE, Neil H, Surrogacy and the law in the UK, Postgraduate Medical Journal, Volume 99, Issue 1170, April 2023, pp. 358–362, DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2022-141625

PASHMI, Monir; TABATABAEI, Seyed Mohammad Sadegh; AHMADI, Seyed Ahmad. “Evaluating the experiences of surrogate and intended mothers in terms of surrogacy in Isfahan”, Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine Vol.8. No.1. Winter 2010, pp: 33-40.

PETERS, Henrike E., SCHATS, Roel, e.a., Gestational surrogacy: results of 10 years of experience in the Netherlands, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Volume 37, Issue 6, 2018, pp. 725-731, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.09.017.

PIERSANTI, Valeria, et al. Surrogacy and “procreative tourism”. What does the future hold from the ethical and legal perspectives? Medicina, 2021, 57.1: 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57010047

SCHUZ, Rhona. Surrogacy in Israel: an analysis of the law in practice. Surrogate motherhood: international perspectives. Portland: Oxford, 2003, 35-54.

TANDERUP, Malene, PANDE Amrita, e.a., Impact of the war in Ukraine and the COVID-19 pandemic on transnational surrogacy – a qualitative study of Danish infertile couples’ experiences of being in ‘exile’, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Volume 47, Issue 4,2023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.06.013.

TORRES, Gloria, SHAPIRO, Anne & MACKEY, Tim K., “A review of surrogate motherhood regulation in South American countries: pointing to a need for an international legal framework, BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 19, 46 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2182-1

VAN DEN AKKER, Olga. Genetic and gestational surrogate mothers' experience of surrogacy, Journal of reproductive and infant psychology, 2003, 21.2: 145-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/0264683031000124091.

WEIS, Christina. Surrogacy in Russia - An Ethnography of Reproductive Labour, Stratification and Migration, Emerald, 2021,DOI: 10.1108/9781839828966

XAVIER, João Proença. Gestacion por substitución (en perspectiva comparada): Análisis comparativo en contexto iberoamericano Portugual Brasil y España. Ratio Legis Libreria Jurídica. Salamanca (Espanha), 2019, pp. 28 a 32.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-13

How to Cite

CONDE, A., Santos PEREIRA, C., DIAS COSTA, E. ., ARAÚJO, M., DOMINGUES, M., PINHO, M., MARTINEZ DE CAMPOS, M., ARAÚJO, R., & JAYANTITAL, S. (2024). Surrogacy in Portugal: drawing insights from international practices. Revista Jurídica Portucalense, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(35)2024.ic-09

Issue

Revista Jurídica Portucalense nº 35 (2024)

Section

SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Jurídica Portucalense

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who published in the journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Authors grant the Journal the right of first publication, and other non-exclusive publishing rights, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of work with recognition of its initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (ex .: publish in an institutional repository or as a chapter in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (eg .: in institutional repositories or on their website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). 
     

RJP does not apply submission, publication or any other fees of any nature. Its articles are open access, with the goal of disseminating scientific knowledge and the debate of legal topics in the area of ​​Legal Sciences.