Third Party Embargoes – A Practical Legal Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(35)2024.ic-17Keywords:
Third party embargoes; Execution Sale; Garnishment; Real rights.Abstract
The relationship between third party embargoes and the sale in progress has been the subject of a wide doctrinal and jurisprudential debate. In effect, under the terms of number 2 of article 824.º of the Civil Code, assets are transferred free of the guarantee rights that encumber them, as well as of other real rights that have no registration prior to any attachment, attachment or guarantee, with with the exception of those established on a previous date, which take effect in relation to third parties regardless of registration. The number 1 of article 342.º of the Civil Code Procedure stipulates that if the attachment, or any judicially ordered act of seizure or delivery of assets, offends the possession or any right incompatible with the performance or scope of the due diligence, the holder who is not a party to the cause, can assert it, deducting third party embargoes. This time, the present work essentially aims to establish when a third party that is not a party to the executive process, can deduct third party embargoes against the attachment or any judicially ordered act that offends its possession or any other right incompatible with the scope of that diligence. The present work essentially aims to establish when a third party that is not a party to the executive process, can deduct third party embargoes against the attachment or any judicially ordered act that offends their possession or any other right incompatible with the scope of that diligence.
References
Amaral, Jorge Augusto Pais de, Direito Processual Civil, 13º edição, Almedina, 2017;
Ascensão, José de Oliveira de, Direito Civil Reais, 5º edição, Coimbra Editora, 2012;
Carrera, Murillo, The distinction between the subjectivist and objectivist formulation of possession and what is the solution adopted by the civil code Portuguese, in Revista Jurídica Portucalense, n.º 28, 2020;
Costa, Mário Júlio de Almeida, Direito das Obrigações, 12º edição revista e atualizada, Almedina, 2009;
Costa, Salvador da, Os Incidentes de Instância, 10º edição atualizada e ampliada, Almedina, 2019;
Fernandes, Luís A. Carvalho, Lições de Direitos Reais, 6º edição atualizada e revista, Quid Juris, 2009;
Freitas, José Lebre de, A Ação Declarativa Comum À Luz do Código de Processo Civil de 2013, 3º edição, Coimbra Editora;
Freitas, José Lebre de, A Ação Executiva, À luz do Código de Processo Civil de 2013, 6º edição, Coimbra Editora, 2014;
Gonçalves, Marco Carvalho, Lições de Processo Civil Executivo, 2º edição revista e aumentada, Almedina, 2018;
Lima, Pires de, e Varela, Antunes, Código Civil Anotado, Volume II, 3º edição revista e atualizada, Coimbra Editora, 1986;
Lima, Pires de, e Varela, Antunes, Código Civil Anotado, Volume III, 2º edição revista e atualizada, Coimbra Editora, 1987;
Leitão, Luís Manuel Teles de Menezes, Arrendamento Urbano, 9º edição, Almedina, 2019;
Leitão, Luís Manuel Teles de Menezes, Direitos Reais, 7º edição, Almedina, 2018;
Leitão, Luís Manuel Teles de Menezes, Direito das Obrigações, Volume I, 15.º edição, Almedina, 2018;
Leitão, Luís Manuel Teles de Menezes, Direito das Obrigações, Volume II, 11º edição, Almedina, 2017;
Leitão, Luís Manuel Teles de Menezes, Direito das Obrigações, Volume III, 12.º edição, Almedina, 2018;
Neto, Abílio, Novo Código de Processo Civil Anotado, 4º edição revista e ampliada, Ediforum, 2017;
Varela, João de Matos Antunes, Obrigações em Geral, Volume I, 10º edição, Almedina, 2011.
Jurisprudência
Acórdão do Tribunal da Relação de Guimarães de 15 de fevereiro de 2018, processo número: 159/09.1TBMTR-B.G1;
Acórdão do Tribunal da Relação de Lisboa de 22 de setembro de 2016, processo número: 26980/15.3T8LSB.L1.-2;
Acórdão do Tribunal da Relação do Porto de 17 de setembro de 2009, processo número: 501/07.0TBPFR-C.P1
Acórdão do Supremo Tribunal de Justiça de 22 de outubro de 2015.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Murillo Magalhães CARRERA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who published in the journal agree to the following terms:
- The Authors grant the Journal the right of first publication, and other non-exclusive publishing rights, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of work with recognition of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (ex .: publish in an institutional repository or as a chapter in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (eg .: in institutional repositories or on their website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
RJP does not apply submission, publication or any other fees of any nature. Its articles are open access, with the goal of disseminating scientific knowledge and the debate of legal topics in the area of Legal Sciences.
