State Control Mechanisms as Means of Improving the Quality of Public Services of Local Self-Government Bodies

Auteurs

  • Vitalii KRUHLOV National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute” https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7228-8635
  • Nataliia VOLKOVA Communal Institution of Higher Education “Dnipro Academy of Continuing Education” of Dnipropetrovsk Regional Council
  • Yevgen KRASNYKOV The 155th Military Representation, the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine
  • Iryna ALIEKSIEIENKO Educational and Science Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
  • Larysa SOKHATIUK Educational and Research Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(34)2023.ic-16

Mots-clés :

public administration, state control, public services, quality of services, mechanisms, local self-government bodies

Résumé

The article deals with the state control mechanisms and their role in improving the quality of public services provided by local self-government bodies. The aim of the article is to identify key state control mechanisms, opportunities for improving the level of public services of local self-government bodies, and provide recommendations for improving the system of state control. Different state control mechanisms were studied, including inspections, performance evaluation, financial audit, quality standards, legal oversight, and citizen feedback mechanisms. Contextual analysis, comparison, and graphic methods were used as research methods. Satisfaction with services in the EU countries was determined by different areas of public services. The study emphasizes the importance of state control in promoting transparency, accountability, and continuous improvement in local government service delivery. The results of the study demonstrate ways of optimization of state control mechanisms by public authorities to improve the overall quality of public services. Attention is focused on the need for effective state control to increase the level of satisfaction and well-being of citizens at the local level. A model of comprehensive implementation of state control mechanisms over the quality of public services of local self-government bodies was developed.

Références

ARENDS, H. The Dangers of Fiscal Decentralization and Public Service Delivery: a Review of Arguments. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 2020, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 599–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-020-00233-7

BELL, E., FOURTON, C., SOWELS, N. Public Services in the UK: the Ongoing Challenges of Delivery and Public Accountability. French Journal of British Studies, 2021, vol. 26, no. XXVI-2. https://doi.org/10.4000/rfcb.7803

BREZOVNIK, B., HOFFMAN, I., KOSTRUBIEC, J. Local Self-Government in Europe. Institute for Local Self-Government Maribor, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4335/978-961-7124-00-2

BIANCHI, N., GIORCELLI, M., MARTINO, E. M. The effects of fiscal decentralization on publicly provided services and labor markets. Working paper No. 29538. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2021. Available from: http://www.nber.org/papers/w29538

BOSTANCI, B., ERDEM, N. Investigating the satisfaction of citizens in municipality services using fuzzy modelling. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2020, vol. 69, pp. 100754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2019.100754

CHAUDHARY, L., IYER, L. The Importance of Being Local: Administrative Decentralization and Human Development. 2022. Available from: http://sites.nd.edu/lakshmi-iyer/files/2022/10/Chaudhary_Iyer_AdministrativeDecentralization_2022Oct15.pdf

COUNCIL OF EUROPE. European Charter of Local Self-Government. 1985. Available from: https://rm.coe.int/168007a088

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. A comparative overview of public administration characteristics and performance in EU28. 2018. Available from: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/3e89d981-48fc-11e8-be1d-01aa75ed71a1/language-en

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2022. Digital public services, 2023. Available from: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi-digital-public-services

EUROPEAN UNION. Developing a Decentralisation Index for the Committee of the Regions Division of Powers Portal. 2021. https://doi.org/10.2863/841455

KRUHLOV, V. V., TERESHCHENKO, D. A. Public-private partnership as tool for developing regional labor potential. Science Innovations, 2019, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 5–13. https://doi.org/10.15407/scine15.06.005

MA, L. Performance management and citizen satisfaction with the government: Evidence from Chinese municipalities. Public Administration, 2017, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 39– 59. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12275

MIHÁLIK, J., HORVÁTH, P., ŠVIKRUHA, M. Give me liberty or give me money: the fiscal decentralization and autonomy of regional governance in Slovakia. European Journal of Government and Economics, 2019, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 96-109. https://doi.org/10.17979/ejge.2019.8.1.4573

MOUSMOUTI, M., MEIDANIS, H., UITDEHAAG, J. Civil enforcement in the EU: a comparative overview. Centre for European Constitutional Law; International Union of Judicial Officers, 2021. Available from: https://www.enforcementatlas.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/EU-Enforcement-Atlas-Comparative-Report.pdf

NERANTZIDIS, M., PAZARSKIS, M., DROGALAS, G., GALANIS, S. Internal auditing in the public sector: a systematic literature review and future research agenda. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 2022, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 189-209. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-02-2020-0015

OECD. Equal Access to Justice for Inclusive Growth: Putting People at the Centre. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019a. https://doi.org/10.1787/597f5b7f-en

OECD. Making Decentralisation Work: A Handbook for Policy-Makers.” Paris: OECD Publishing, OECD Multi-level Governance Studies, 2019b. https://dx.doi.org/10.1787/g2g9faa7-en

OECD. Digital Government Index: 2019 results. OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 03. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2020a. https://doi.org/10.1787/4de9f5bb-en.

OECD. The OECD Digital Government Policy Framework: Six Dimensions of a Digital Government. OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, 2020b. Vol. 2. https://doi.org/10.1787/f64fed2a-en

OECD. Health at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1787/ae3016b9-en

OECD. Serving Citizens: Measuring the Performance of Services for a Better User Experience. 2022. Available from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/65223af7-en.pdf?expires=1688842197&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=A409045962BAC3C8FF5AB90CA830A9C6

OECD. Government at a Glance 2023. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1787/3d5c5d31-en

PONCE-RODRÍGUEZ, R. A., HANKLA, C. R., MARTINEZ-VAZQUEZ, J., HEREDIA-ORTIZ, E. Rethinking the political economy of decentralization: How elections and parties shape the provision of local public goods. Publius, 2018, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 523–558. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjy003

SABIR, B. Y., OTHMAN, B. J., GARDI, B., ISMAEL, N. B., HAMZA, P. A., SORGULI, S., AZIZ, H. M., AHMED, S. A., ALI, B. J., ANWAR, G. Administrative Decentralization: The Transfer of Competency from the Ministry of Education to General Directorates. International Journal of Rural Development, Environment and Health Research, 2021, vol. 5, no. 3. https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijreh.5.3.1

SCHOUTE, M., BUDDING, T., GRADUS, R. Municipalities’ choices of service delivery modes: The influence of service, political, governance, and financial characteristics. International Public Management Journal, 2018, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 502-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2017.1297337

SHIN, G., JHEE, B.-K. Better service delivery, more satisfied citizens? The mediating effects of local government management capacity in South Korea. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies, 2021, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 42-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.316

SONG, M., AN, S.-H., MEIER, K. J. Quality standards, implementation autonomy, and citizen satisfaction with public services: cross-national evidence. Public Management Review, 2020, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 906–928. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1730939

SONG, M., MEIER, K. J. Citizen satisfaction and the kaleidoscope of government performance: How multiple stakeholders see government performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2018, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 489-505. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy006

SUJARWOTO, S. Why decentralization works and does not works? A systematic literature review. Journal of Public Administration Studies, 2017, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jpas.2017.002.01.1

TUMWEBAZE, R. Performance management systems and local government service delivery in Uganda: A Case of Bushenyi District. Doctoral dissertation. Uganda Management Institute, 2015. Available from: http://umispace.umi.ac.ug/bitstream/handle/20.500.12305/751/ROBINAH%20TUMWEBAZE%20PAM%2013.MMSPAM.007.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

WALKER, R. M., ANDREWS, R. Local government management and performance: A review of evidence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2015, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 101-133. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut038

Téléchargements

Publiée

2023-12-29

Comment citer

Vitalii KRUHLOV, Nataliia VOLKOVA, Yevgen KRASNYKOV, Iryna ALIEKSIEIENKO, & Larysa SOKHATIUK. (2023). State Control Mechanisms as Means of Improving the Quality of Public Services of Local Self-Government Bodies. Revista Jurídica Portucalense, 325–345. https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(34)2023.ic-16

Numéro

Revista Jurídica Portucalense nº 34 (2023)

Rubrique

RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE

Licence

(c) Tous droits réservés Revista Jurídica Portucalense 2023

Creative Commons License

Ce travail est disponible sous la licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International .

Authors who published in the journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Authors grant the Journal the right of first publication, and other non-exclusive publishing rights, licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of work with recognition of its initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (ex .: publish in an institutional repository or as a chapter in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (eg .: in institutional repositories or on their website) at any point before or during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and the citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). 
     

RJP does not apply submission, publication or any other fees of any nature. Its articles are open access, with the goal of disseminating scientific knowledge and the debate of legal topics in the area of ​​Legal Sciences.