Administrative-Law Status of National Security Agencies

Inna  PIDBEREZNYKH; Ivanna HORBACH-KUDRIA; Sergii  GOLUBYTSKYI; Anatoliy  BABICHEV; Mykhailo  LOSHYTSKYI

doi:10.34625/issn.2183-2705(36)2024.ic-27

Autores

Inna PIDBEREZNYKH Black Sea National University named after Petro Mohyla - https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9906-4327
Ivanna HORBACH-KUDRIA The National Academy of Internal Affairs https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8640-2486
Sergii GOLUBYTSKYI Interregional Academy of Personnel Management - https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9906-4327
Anatoliy BABICHEV V.N.Karazin Kharkiv National University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7587-4824
Mykhailo LOSHYTSKYI National Defence University of Ukraine - https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0533-0079

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34625/issn.2183-2705(36)2024.ic-27

Palavras-chave:

actores da segurança; estatuto de direito administrativo; segurança nacional; agências de segurança nacional; interesses nacionais; regime jurídico.

Resumo

O artigo analisa as abordagens de direito administrativo que regulam as actividades dos organismos de segurança nacional, com ênfase na sua capacidade de adaptação a novos desafios. O objetivo é avaliar criticamente as normas jurídicas e as estruturas organizacionais que determinam as funções e responsabilidades dos organismos de segurança nacional, bem como o seu impacto no sistema de segurança global. A investigação utiliza os métodos de análise jurídica, investigação comparativa e estudos de casos que abrangem abordagens regulamentares e empíricas, bem como a modelação de cenários. Os resultados do estudo revelaram diferenças significativas no quadro jurídico dos diferentes países e apontaram para uma fraca coordenação entre os principais serviços de segurança. Ao contrário da abordagem tradicional, em que os aspectos administrativos e jurídicos são considerados separadamente, este estudo integra estas questões para melhor compreender a gestão da segurança nacional. As conclusões sublinham a necessidade de melhorar as normas jurídicas e de reforçar a cooperação interdepartamental, a fim de melhorar a eficácia da gestão da segurança. As perspectivas de investigação futura incluem a análise do impacto das novas tecnologias nos processos administrativos e na regulamentação jurídica no contexto da segurança nacional, com especial ênfase na crescente adaptabilidade às ameaças modernas.

Referências

ARDIANSAH, A. and OKTAPANI, S. Politik hukum pemenuhan hak atas kesehatan rakyat Indonesia berdasarkan UU SJSN dan UU BPJS. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 2020, vol. 8, no. 1, 161. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v8i1.707

ARIMBI, D. Legal status of the Social Security Administrator (BPJS) as a public legal entity. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 2020, vol. 19, no. 3, 829. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2019.19.3.2700

AUBY, J.–B. Administrative law facing digital challenges. European Review of Digital Administration & Law – Erdal, 2020, vol. 1, no. 1–2, pp. 7–15. https://doi.org/10.4399/97888255389602

BRANOWICKI, W. Peculiarities of determining the legal status of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine as a subject of public administration. Administrative Law and Process, 2023, vol. 1, no. 40, pp. 5–20. https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2023.1.01

CASSESE, S. Administrative law beyond the state: A European perspective. Journal of International Law and Politics, 2005, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 663-694. Available from https://iilj.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Cassese-Administrative-Law-Without-the-State-2005.pdf

CHIN, J. J. Understanding national security strategies through time. 2023, October 17. Available from https://tnsr.org/2023/09/understanding-national-security-strategies-through-time/

COHEN, H. G. Nations and markets. Journal of International Economic Law, 2020, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 793–815. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgaa032

COMMON SECURITY AND DEFENCE POLICY (CSDP). 2024. Available from https://www.european-cyber-defence-policy.com/Common_Security_Defence_Policy_(CSDP).html

DE WAAL, I. M. Coherence in law: A way to stimulate the transition towards a circular economy? A critical analysis of the European Commission’s aspiration to achieve full coherence between chemicals legislation and waste legislation – and product legislation. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 2021, 28, vol. 6, pp. 760–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263x211048604

DEAL, R. J. A. K. A process for using LLMs in a national security research organization. 2024, May 22. Available from https://www.cna.org/our-media/indepth/2024/05/a-process-for-using-llms-in-a-national-security-research-organization

DELGADO, L. F. P. Papel dos Planos Nacionais de Segurança Pública na indução de políticas públicas municipais de segurança. Revista Brasileira De Segurança Pública, 2022, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 10–31. https://doi.org/10.31060/rbsp.2022.v16.n2.1298

DIAGRAMGPT – AI DIAGRAM GENERATOR. 2024. Available from https://www.eraser.io/diagramgptn

DKAMINSKAS. A new NATO command structure. 2024, June 7. Available from https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/issue-brief/a-new-nato-command-structure/

HURKOVSKYI, M., and SYDOR, M. The concept of national security as an administrative and legal category. Social & Legal Studios, 2021, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 26–32. https://doi.org/10.32518/2617-4162-2021-2-26-32

IBM SPSS STATISTICS. 2024. Availalbe from https://www.ibm.com/products/spss-statistics

INFOGRAPHY TECHNOLOGIES. E-Governance tutorial – IOE syllabus - Easy explanation. 2024. Available from https://ezexplanation.com/content/security-management-model/

JPIERSOL. Importance of interagency collaboration in national security. 2023, April 27. Available from https://onlinewilder.vcu.edu/blog/importance-of-interagency-collaboration-in-national-security/

KINGSBURY, B., KRISCH, N. and STEWART, R. B. The emergence of global administrative law. Law and Contemporary Problems, 2005, vol. 68, no. 3-4, pp. 15 – 61. Available from https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1361&context=lcp

KOTUKH Ye. V. National cybersecurity strategies: A comparative analysis. Pressing Problems of Public Administration, 2021, vol. 1, no. 59, pp. 32-42. https://doi.org/10.34213/ap.21.01.04

KUZ, V. State’s energy security in the conditions of strengthening of globalization processes. University Scientific Notes, 2023, pp. 18–29. https://doi.org/10.37491/unz.93-94.2

LIMAN, A. and WEBER, K. Quantum computing: Bridging the National Security–Digital sovereignty divide. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 2023, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 476–483. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2023.44

LYTVYN, N., et al. Enforcement of court decisions as a social guarantee of protection of citizens rights and freedoms. Prawo i Wiez, 2022, vol. 39, pp. 80-102. https://doi.org/10.36128/priw.vi39.351

MARTINEZ, F. J. B. A federalism-based comparative analysis to Diminish National Security threats in contemporary policy transfer. Conflitologia / Nota Bene, 2023, vol. 1, pp. 82–87. https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0617.2023.1.39642

MEH, Y., GOLOVKO, V. and HOROBETS, D. Administrative status of modern subjects of the state security sector. Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, 2023, vol. 5, pp. 726–730. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.05.130

MERCADO, H. Resolving national security questions: A comparative analysis of judicial review in the United States, Israel, and Europe. 2020, June 22. Availalbe from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3633092

MINITAB. Data analysis, statistical & process improvement tools. 2024. Available from https://www.minitab.com/en-us/

MIRKOVIC, V. Germany’s security management in the light of the integrated security – Current state and prospects. Science International Journal, 2024, vol. 3., no. 1, pp. 89–96. https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0301089m

NATIONAL INITIATIVE FOR CYBERSECURITY CAREERS AND STUDIES. 2024. Available from https://niccs.cisa.gov/?gad_source=1&gbraid=0AAAAAqMDttBCu8HF7qOh-zO5kzJiG1hzV&gclid=CjwKCAjw5qC2BhB8EiwAvqa41swePMLVcxuodnjMNBW8yD84-sNXyKF_sRBMpfGe7JDgKaCIoxHA0BoCKqoQAvD_BwE

NATIONAL SECURITY AND TERRORISM. 2024. Available from https://www.rand.org/topics/national-security-and-terrorism.html

PREVENCY. Crisis simulation. 2022, February 14. Available from https://prevency.com/en/crisis-simulation/?gad_source=1&gbraid=0AAAAADh-FkA6Wq7FZyVODGH0Chk2RmXAW&gclid=Cj0KCQjww5u2BhDeARIsALBuLnOtxfaX6dh4gnyxAUBQJU7O6Sn2i51CtswloJJR5m3Lw3KgeY_-bckaAu5TEALw_wcB

RESEARCH SECURITY. 2024. Available from https://new.nsf.gov/research-security

ROMANOSKY, S., et al. Identifying and prioritizing systemically important entities: advancing critical infrastructure security and resilience. RAND Corporation eBooks, 2023. https://doi.org/10.7249/rra1512-1

SEMENETS-ORLOVA, I., et al. Human-centered approach in new development tendencies of value-oriented public administration: Potential of education. Economic Affairs (New Delhi), 2022, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 899-906. https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.5.2022.25

SENYSHYN, N. The genesis of the formation of the territorial organization system of power in Ukraine. Public Administration and Law Review, 2021, no. 1, pp. 10–20. https://doi.org/10.36690/2674-5216-2021-1-10

STEWART, R. B. Accountability and the discontents of global governance: An essay on global administrative law. American Journal of International Law, 2006, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 611 – 623.

USING NVIVO. 2024. Available from https://help-nv.qsrinternational.com/12/mac/v12.1.115-d3ea61/Content/concepts-strategies/using-nvivo-for-qualitative-research.htm

WILSON, L., et al. Australian biometric system to meet national security objectives – Part II Legislation and policy. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 2020, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2020.1781253

ZIĘCINA, M., FICOŃ, K. and SOKOŁOWSKI, W. Maritime state safety is a typological category of national security. Systemy Logistyczne Wojsk, 2021, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 25–42. https://doi.org/10.37055/slw/140383