Comprehensive Corneal Thickness Evaluation: A Narrative Review of Past, Present and Future
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.42135Keywords:
Corneal Pachymetry, Corneal TomographyAbstract
Corneal thickness plays a fundamental role in assessing corneal health and diagnosing ectatic diseases. Initially, pachymetry relied on single-point measurements, particularly central corneal thickness (CCT). With the introduction of corneal tomography, it became possible to map corneal thickness at multiple locations, allowing for a more precise three-dimensional evaluation. In recent years, indices derived from spatial pachymetric profiles—such as the Corneal Thickness Spatial Profile (CTSP), Percentage Thickness Increase (PTI), and Ambrósio’s Relational Thickness (ART)—have significantly improved the sensitivity and specificity of early ectasia detection. Moreover, epithelial thickness analysis has gained relevance by enabling the identification of compensatory remodeling in early stages of disease. These advanced tools have also been applied in the post-refractive surgery setting, where distinguishing between naturally thin corneas and true ectatic thinning is crucial. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of corneal thickness evaluation over time, describe current methodologies, and discuss their clinical application in the early diagnosis and monitoring of corneal disorders.
Downloads
References
Renato A. Percentage Thickness Increase and Absolute Difference from Thinnest to Describe Thickness Profile. J Refract Surg. 2021; 26: 84-6. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20100121-01.
Maurice DM, Giardini AA. A Simple Optical Apparatus for Measuring the Corneal Thickness, and the Average Thickness of the Human Cornea. Br J Ophthalmol. 1951; 35: 169-77.
González-Pérez J, González-Méijome JM, Rodríguez Ares MT, Parafita MA. Central corneal thickness measured with three optical devices and ultrasound pachometry. Eye Contact Lens. 2011;37:66-70.
Ambrosio R, Klyce SD, Wilson SE. Corneal topographic and pachymetric screening of keratorefractive patients. J Refract Surg. 2003; 19: 24-9.
Jonsson M, Behndig A. Pachymetric evaluation prior to laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:701-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.02.028.
Ambrosio R Jr, Belin MW. Imaging of the cornea: topography vs tomography. J Refract Surg. 2010;26:847-9. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20101006-01.
Prakash G, Agarwal A, Mazhari AI, Kumar G, Desai P, Kumar DA, et al. A new, pachymetry-based approach for diagnostic cutoffs for normal, suspect and keratoconic cornea. Eye. 2012;26:650-7. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.365.
Mandell RB, Polse KA. Keratoconus: Spatial Variation of Corneal Thickness as a Diagnostic Test. Arch Ophthalmol. 1969; 82: 182-8.
Avitabile T, Marano F, Uva MG, Reibaldi A. Evaluation of central and peripheral corneal thickness with ultrasound biomicroscopy in normal and keratoconic eyes. Cornea. 1997;16:639-44.
Avitabile T, Franco L, Ortisi E, Castiglione F, Pulvirenti M, et al. Keratoconus staging: a computer-assisted ultrabiomicroscopic method compared with videokeratographic analysis. Cornea. 2004;23:655-60. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000127486.78424.6e.
Castiglione F. Estimating the keratoconus index from ultrasound images of the human cornea. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2000; 19: 1268-72.
Alonso RS, Luz A, Coca Velarde LG. Corneal-thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution: tomographic indices to detect keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32: 1851-9.
Luz A, Ursulio M, Castaneda D, Ambrosio Jr R. Progressão da espessura corneana do ponto mais fino em direção ao limbo: estudo de uma população normal e de portadores de ceratocone para criação de valores de referência. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2006; 69: 579-83.
Sun SY, Wacker K, Baratz KH, Patel SV. Determining Subclinical Edema in Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy: Revised Classification using Scheimpflug Tomography for Preoperative Assessment. Ophthalmology. 2019;126:195-204. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.07.005.
Ambrosio R, Faria Correia F, Belin MW. Analyzing Tomographic Thickness for Detecting Corneal Ectatic Diseases. Keratoconus. 2017:77-85.
Ambrosio R Jr, Caiado AL, Guerra FP, Louzada R, Sinha RA, Luz A, et al. Novel pachymetric parameters based on corneal tomography for diagnosing keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2011;27:753-8. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20110721-01.
Lopes BT, Ramos IC, Salomão MQ, Guerra FP, Schallhorn SC, Schallhorn JM, et al. Enhanced Tomographic Assessment to Detect Corneal Ectasia Based on Artificial Intelligence. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;195:223-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.08.005.
Holladay J. Keratoconus detection using corneal topography. J Refract Surg. 2009;25:5958-62. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20090915-11.
Vinciguerra R, Ambrosio R Jr, Elsheikh A, Roberts CJ, Lopes B, Morenghi E, et al. Detection of Keratoconus With a New Biomechanical Index. J Refract Surg. 2016;32:803-10. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20160629-01.
Ambrosio R Jr, Lopes BT, Faria-Correia F, Salomão MQ, Bühren J, Roberts CJ, et al. Integration of Scheimpflug-Based Corneal Tomography and Biomechanical Assessments for Enhancing Ectasia Detection. J Refract Surg. 2017;33:434-43. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20170426-02.
Li HF, Petroll WM, Moller-Pedersen T, Maurer JK, Cavanagh HD, Jester JV. Epithelial and corneal thickness measurements by in vivo confocal microscopy through focusing (CMTF). Curr Eye Res. 1997;16:214-21. doi: 10.1076/ceyr.16.3.214.15412.
Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, Silverman RH, Coleman DJ. Epithelial thickness in the normal cornea: three-dimensional display with Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:571-81. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20080601-05.
Reinstein DZ, Silverman RH, Sutton HF, Coleman DJ. Very high-frequency ultrasound corneal analysis identifies anatomic correlates of optical complications of lamellar refractive surgery: anatomic diagnosis in lamellar surgery. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:474-82. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90105-7.
Huang D, Tang M, Shekhar R. Mathematical model of corneal surface smoothing after laser refractive surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135:267-78. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01942-6.
Silverman RH, Urs R, Roychoudhury A, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, Reinstein DZ. Epithelial remodeling as basis for machinebased identification of keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:1580-7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12578.
Li Y, Tan O, Brass R, Weiss JL, Huang D. Corneal epithelial thickness mapping by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography in normal and keratoconic eyes. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:2425-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.06.023.
Rocha KM, Perez-Straziota CE, Stulting RD, Randleman JB. SD-OCT analysis of regional epithelial thickness profiles in keratoconus, postoperative corneal ectasia, and normal eyes. J Refract Surg. 2013;29:173-9. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20130129-08. Erratum in: J Refract Surg. 2013;29:234.
Reinstein DZ, Srivannaboon S, Gobbe M, Archer TJ, Silverman RH, Sutton H, et al. Epithelial thickness profile changes induced by myopic LASIK as measured by Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg. 2009;25:444-50. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20090422-07.
Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Change in epithelial thickness profile 24 hours and longitudinally for 1 year after myopic LASIK: Three-dimensional display with artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg. 2012;28:195-201. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20120127-02.
Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, Silverman RH, Coleman DJ. Epithelial thickness after hyperopic LASIK: three-dimensional display with Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg. 2010;26:555-64. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20091105-02.
Reinstein DZ, Archer T. Combined Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound-assisted transepithelial phototherapeutic keratectomy and wavefront-guided treatment following multiple corneal refractive procedures. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:1870-6. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.07.016.
Swartz T, Marten L, Wang M. Measuring the cornea: the latest developments in corneal topography. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007;18:325-33. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3281ca7121.
Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Urs R, Gobbe M, RoyChoudhury A, Silverman RH. Detection of Keratoconus in Clinically and Algorithmically Topographically Normal Fellow Eyes Using Epithelial Thickness Analysis. J Refract Surg. 2015;31:736-44. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20151021-02.
Temstet C, Sandali O, Bouheraoua N, Hamiche T, Galan A, El Sanharawi M, et al. Corneal epithelial thickness mapping using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography for detection of form fruste keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:812-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.06.043.
Vega-Estrada A, Mimouni M, Espla E, Alió Del Barrio J, Alio JL. Corneal Epithelial Thickness Intrasubject Repeatability and its Relation With Visual Limitation in Keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;200:255-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.01.015.
Yang F, Yang Z, Zhao S, Huang Y. To Investigate the Changes in Corneal Curvature and Its Correlation with Corneal Epithelial Remodeling After Trans-PRK and FS-LASIK. Curr Eye Res. 2024;49:1061-7. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2024.2361728.
Vinciguerra R, Ambrosio R Jr, Elsheikh A, Hafezi F, Yong Kang DS, Kermani O, et al. Detection of postlaser vision correction ectasia with a new combined biomechanical index. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021;47:1314-8. doi: 10.1097/jcrs.0000000000000629.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Sociedade Portuguesa de Oftalmologia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Do not forget to download the Authorship responsibility statement/Authorization for Publication and Conflict of Interest.
The article can only be submitted with these two documents.
To obtain the Authorship responsibility statement/Authorization for Publication file, click here.
To obtain the Conflict of Interest file, click here
