Educar para a mudança e a sustentabilidade: Avaliação de uma proposta de aprendizagem experiencial para capacitar os professores em formação inicial
Educate for change and sustainability: Evaluation of an experiential learning proposal to train teachers in initial training
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21814/rpe.15303Palavras-chave:
Educação Ambiental e Sustentabilidade, Formação de professores, Aprendizagem experiencial, Ciclo de aprendizagemResumo
Um dos principais desafios que a educação deve enfrentar é a busca pela Sustentabilidade. E nesse processo, o corpo docente é um pilar fundamental. Para tanto, apresenta-se uma proposta educacional de formação inicial de professores baseada na experimentação e análise de um ciclo de aprendizagem em torno do problema socioambiental da mudança climática. Para sua avaliação, foi utilizada uma metodologia mista. Os resultados obtidos sugerem que esse tipo de prática pode contribuir para melhorar o comprometimento dos futuros professores com uma Educação Ambiental voltada à Sustentabilidade e crítica ao atual modelo de desenvolvimento, permitindo a construção de um arcabouço educacional baseado em metodologias globalizadas e participativas, bem como para favorecer a aquisição de competências de ensino
Downloads
Referências
Agirreazkuenaga, L. (2019). Embedding sustainable development goals in education. Teachers’ perspective about education for sustainability in the Basque Autonomous Community. Sustainability, 11(5), 1496. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051496
Alarcão, I., Tavares, J., Mealha, O., & Souza, D. (2018). Pensar a universidade dos próximos 20 anos através de uma metodologia de cenários. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 31(1), 108-122. https://doi.org/10.21814/rpe.12622
Álvarez-Suárez, P., Vega-Marcote, P., & Garcia-Mira, R. (2014). Sustainable consumption: A teaching intervention in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 15(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-06-2011-0044
Arreguín-Anderson, M., & Kennedy, K. (2013). Deliberate language planning in environmental education: A CRT/LatCrit perspective. The Journal of Environmental Education, 44 (1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2012.665098
Bardin, L. (1991). Análisis de contenido. Madrid, España: Ediciones Akal.
Borg, N., Gericke, H., Höglund, O., & Bergman, E. (2014). Subject and experience bound differences in teachers’ conceptual understanding of sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 20(4), 526-551.
Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cebrián, G., & Junyent, M. (2015). Competencies in education for sustainable development: Exploring the student teachers’ views. Sustainability, 7(3), 2768-2786.
Desjean-Perrotta, B., Moseley, C., & Cantu, L. E. (2008). Preservice teachers' perceptions of the environment: Does ethnicity or dominant residential experience matter?. The Journal of Environmental Education, 39(2), 21-32.
Eames, C., Law, B., Barker, M., Iles, H., McKenzie, J., Patterson, R., ... & Wright, A. (2006). Investigating teachers’ pedagogical approaches in environmental education that promote students’ action competence. Wellington, New Zealand: Teaching & Learning Research Initiative. Retrieved from http://www.tlri.org.nz/sites/default/files/projects/9224_finalreport.pdf
Erickson, F. (2012). Qualitative research methods for science education. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1451-1469). Netherlands: Springer.
Eurydice. (2011). La enseñanza de las Ciencias en Europa: Políticas nacionales,
prácticas e investigación. Centro de Publicaciones. Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte. Centro Nacional de Innovación e Investigación Educativa (CNIIE). Madrid: Secretaría General Técnica.
Evans, N., Whitehouse, H., & Gooch, M. (2012). Barriers, successes and enabling
practices of education for sustainability in far North Queensland schools: A case study. The Journal of Environmental Education, 43(2), 121-138.
Feinstein, N. W., & Kirchgasler, K. L. (2015). Sustainability in science education? How the Next Generation Science Standards approach sustainability, and why it matters. Science Education, 99(1), 121-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.21137
Fernández, M., Alférez, A., Vidal, S., Fernández, M. Y., & Albareda, S. (2016). Methodological approaches to change consumption habits of future teachers in Barcelona, Spain: Reducing their personal ecological footprint. Journal of Cleaner Production, 122, 154-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.026
Fortner, R. W., & Corney, J. R. (2002). Great Lakes educational needs assessment: Teachers’ priorities for topics, materials, and training. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 28(1), 3-14.
Foss, A. W., & Ko, Y. (2019). Barriers and opportunities for climate change education: The case of Dallas-Fort Worth in Texas. The Journal of Environmental Education, 50(3), 145-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2019.1604479
García-Esteban, F. E., & Murga-Menoyo, A. (2015). El profesorado de educación infantil ante el desarrollo sostenible. Necesidades formativas. Enseñanza & Teaching: Revista interuniversitaria de didáctica, 33(1), 121-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.14201/et2014331121142
Garmendia Mujika, M., Barragués Fuentes, J. I., Zuza Elosegi, K., & Guisasola Aranzabal, J. (2014). Proyecto de formación del profesorado universitario de Ciencias, Matemáticas y Tecnología, en las metodologías de Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas y Proyectos. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 32(2), 113-129. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.911
Gayford, C. (2001). Education for sustainability: An approach to the professional development of teachers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 24(3), 313-327.
Gifford, R. (2014). Environmental psychology matters. Psychology, 65(1), 541-579. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115048
Irwin, S. (2008). Data analysis and interpretation. In C. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 415-436). New York: Guilford Press.
Karplus, R. (1977). Science teaching and the development of reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14(2), 169-175.
Kopnina, H. (2012). Education for sustainable development (ESD): The turn away from “environment” in environmental education?. Environmental Education Research, 18(5), 669-717.
Kyburz-Graber, R. (2013) Socioecological approaches to environmental education and research: A paradigmatic response to behavioral change orientations. In R. B. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon, & A. E. J. Wals (Eds.), International handbook of research on environmental education (pp. 23-32). New York: Routledge.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Lotz-Sisitka, H., Wals, A. E., Kronlid, D., & McGarry, D. (2015). Transformative, transgressive social learning: Rethinking higher education pedagogy in times of systemic global dysfunction. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 16, 73-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.07.018
Marx, R. W., & Harris, C. J. (2006). No Child Left Behind and science education: Opportunities, challenges, and risks. The Elementary School Journal, 106(5), 467-478.
Mascarell, L., & Vilches Peña, A. (2016). Química verde y sostenibilidad en la educación en ciencias en secundaria. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 34(2), 25-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1688
McKeown, R., & Hopkins, C. (2002). Weaving sustainability into pre-service teacher education programs. In W. Leal Filho (Ed.), Teaching sustainability at universities: Towards curriculum greening (pp. 251-274). Frankfurt, Germany: PeterLang.
Mogensen, F., & Mayer, M. (2005). Eco-schools: Trends and divergences. A comparative study on ECO-school development processes in 13 countries. Viena, Austria: Austrian Federal Ministry of Education, Science and Culture.
Naciones Unidas. (2015). Transformar nuestro mundo: La agenda 2030 para el desarrollo sostenible. Disponible en http://www.un.org/es/comun/docs/?symbol=A/RES/70/1
O`Gorman, L., & Davis, J. (2013). Ecological footprinting: Its potential as a tool for change in preservice teacher education. Environmental Education Research, 19(6), 779-791.
Öhman, J., & Öhman, M. (2013). Participatory approach in practice: An analysis of student discussions about climate change. Environmental Education Research, 19(3), 324-341.
Oliveras, B., Márquez, C., & Sanmartí, N. (2013). The use of newspaper articles as a tool to develop critical thinking in science classes. International Journal of Science Education, 35(6), 885-905.
Pérez-Rodríguez, U., Varela-Losada, M., Álvarez-Lires, F. J., & Vega-Marcote, P. (2017). Attitudes of preservice teachers: Design and validation of an attitude scale toward environmental education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 634-641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.245
Pérez-Rodríguez, U., Varela-Losada, M., Lorenzo-Rial, M. A., & Vega-Marcote, P. (2017). Tendencias actitudinales del profesorado en formación hacia una educación ambiental transformadora. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 22(1), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1136-1034(17)30045-X
Piasentin, F. B., & Roberts, L. (2018). What elements in a sustainability course contribute to paradigm change and action competence? A study at Lincoln University, New Zealand. Environmental Education Research, 24(5), 694-715. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1321735
Plano-Clark, V. L., Creswell, J. W., Green, D. O. N., & Shope, R. J. (2008). Mixing quantitative and qualitative approaches. In C. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 363-388). New York: Guilford Press.
Robottom, I., & Hart, P. (1993). Research in environmental education: Engaging the debate. Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University.
Schelly, C., Cross, J., Franzen, W., Hall, P., & Reeve, S. (2012). How to go green: Creating a conservation culture in a public high school through education, modelling, and communication. The Journal of Environmental Education, 43(3), 143-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2011.631611
Schneller, A. (2008). Environmental service learning: Outcomes of innovative pedagogy in Baja California Sur, Mexico. Environmental Education Research, 14(3), 291-307.
Steffen, W., & Stafford, M. (2013). Planetary boundaries, equity and global sustainability: Why wealthy countries could benefit from more equity. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 403-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.04.007
Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407-424.
Stern, M. J., Powell, R. B., & Hill, D. (2014). Environmental education program evaluation in the new millennium: What do we measure and what have we learned?. Environmental Education Research, 20(5), 581-611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.838749
Stevenson, R. B. (Ed.). (2007). Revisiting schooling and environmental education: Contradictions in purpose and practice [Editorial]. Environmental Education Research, 13(2), 129-138.
Sund, P., & Wickman, P. O. (2011). Socialization content in schools and education for sustainable development: A study of teachers’ selective traditions. Environmental Education Research, 17(5), 599-624.
Tilbury, D. (2011). Education for sustainable development. An expert review of processes and learning. Paris, France: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0019/001914/191442e.pdf
Tilbury, D., Coleman, V., & Garlick, D. (2005). A National review of environmental education and its contribution to sustainability in Australia: school education. (A National Review of Environmental Education and its Contribution to Sustainability in Australia). Canberra, ACT: Department of the Environment and Heritage.
Todd, S. (2009). Toward an imperfect education: Facing humanity, rethinking cosmopolitanism. Boulder, Colorado: Paradigm.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. (2013). Empowering educators for a sustainable future. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Retrieved from https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/esd/ESD_Publications/Empowering_Educators_for_a_Sustainable_Future_ENG.pdf
Van Petegem, P., Blieck, A., & Van Ongevalle, J. (2007) Conceptions and awareness concerning environmental education: A Zimbabwean case‐study in three secondary teacher education colleges. Environmental Education Research, 13(3), 287-306.
Varela-Losada, M., Arias-Correa, A., & Vega-Marcote, P. (2018). Training teachers committed to climate change mitigation. In U. M. Azeiteiro, W. Leal Filho, & L. Aires (Eds.), Climate literacy and innovations in climate change education (pp. 307-321). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Varela-Losada, M., Vega-Marcote, P., Pérez-Rodríguez, U., & Álvarez-Lires, M. (2016). Going to action? A literature review on educational proposals in formal environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 22(3), 390-421. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1101751
Vilches, A., & Gil Pérez, D. (2016). La transición a la sostenibilidad como objetivo urgente para la superación de la crisis sistémica actual. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 13(2), 395-407. Disponible en http://hdl.handle.net/10498/18296
Vosniadou, S. (2001). How children learn. Brussels, Belgium: International Academy of Education.
Walker, K. (1997). Challenging critical theory in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 3(2), 155-162.
Wals, A. (Ed.). (2007). Social learning towards a sustainable world. Wageningen, Netherlands: Wageningen Academic.
Wals, A. E., Brody, M., Dillon, J., & Stevenson R. B. (2014). Convergence between science and environmental education. Science, 344(6184), 583-584. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250515
Worldwatch Institute. (2015). Confronting hidden threats to sustainability: State of the world 2015. Washington: The Worldwatch Institute.
Yavetz, B., Goldman, D., & Pe’er, S. (2009). Environmental literacy of preservice teachers in Israel: A comparison between students at the onset and end of their studies. Environmental Education Research, 15(4), 393-415.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
1. Autores conservam os direitos de autor e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 CC-BY-SA que permite a partilha do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista;
2. Autores e autoras têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: depositar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista;
3. Autores e autoras têm permissão e são estimulado/as a publicar e distribuir o seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal), já que isso pode aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição Compartilhamento pela mesma Licença Internacional 4.0
