Estratégias para promover a agência do estudante no processo de avaliação e feedback digital

Diogo Casanova

doi:10.21814/rpe.23750

Auteurs

Diogo Casanova Universidade Aberta

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.21814/rpe.23750

Mots-clés :

Agência do Estudante, Avaliação Digital, Feedback, Pedagogia

Résumé

A avaliação e o feedback digital têm vindo a crescer como temas de investigação nos últimos anos, em particular no ensino superior. Dentro destes temas, o papel do estudante como tendo agência no processo de avaliação e feedback é considerado uma área relevante sobretudo tendo em conta o contexto do ensino superior, no qual se pretende que o estudante desenvolva competências de aprendizagem ao longo da vida. Nesta investigação pretende-se investigar a disponibilidade dos docentes para ceder ao estudante algum do poder que detêm no processo de avaliação. Procura-se, também, identificar que estratégias podem ser utilizadas pelos docentes no sentido de promover este novo papel do estudante na avaliação digital. A partir de uma metodologia qualitativa, foram recolhidos dados de 58 docentes que participaram em 10 focus-group criativos, uma abordagem ao focus-group na qual, para além de se envolverem em discussão sobre as suas práticas, os participantes procuraram, em grupo, desenvolver soluções de melhoria pedagógica e tecnológica nas suas práticas de avaliação digital. Como resultado da investigação, identifica-se um conjunto de recomendações para promover maior envolvimento do estudante nas estratégias de avaliação, organizado em três temas: (i) a preparação para a avaliação; (ii) a avaliação formativa; e (iii) o feedback após a submissão.

##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##

##plugins.generic.usageStats.noStats##

Références

Amante, L., & Oliveira, I. (2019). Avaliação e feedback: Desafios atuais. Universidade Aberta.

Amante, L., Oliveira, I. R., & Gomes, M. J. (2019). E-assessment in Portuguese higher education: Framework and perceptions of teachers and students. In A. Azevedo & J. Azevedo (Eds.), Handbook of research on e-assessment in higher education (pp. 312-333). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5936-8.ch013

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

Bausili, A. V. (2018). From piloting e-submission to electronic management of assessment (EMA): Mapping grading journeys. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 463-478. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12547

Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600679050

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328-352¬. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315-1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354

Carless, D., & Chan, K. K. H. (2017). Managing dialogic use of exemplars. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(6), 930-941. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1211246

Casanova, D. (2021). From Humboldt to Netflix: Examples of how to promote student agency in higher education. In I. Huet, T. Pessoa, & F. Sol (Eds.), Excellence in teaching and learning in higher education: Institutional policies, research and practices in Europe (pp. 245-266). Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra.

Casanova, D., Alsop, G., & Huet, I. (2021). Giving away some of their powers! Towards learner agency in digital assessment and feedback. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 16, 20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-021-00168-6

Casanova, D., Di Napoli, R., & Leijon, M. (2018). Which space? Whose space? An experience in involving students and teachers in space design. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(4), 488-503. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1414785

Casanova, D., Huet, I., Garcia, F., & Pessoa, T. (2020). Role of technology in the design of learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 23, 413-427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09314-1

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications.

Charteris, J., & Smardon, D. (2018). A typology of agency in new generation learning environments: Emerging relational, ecological and new material considerations. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 26(1), 51-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2017.1345975

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013). Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The Psychologist, 26(2), 120-123. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269928387

Dixon, H., Hawe, E., & Hamilton, R. (2020). The case for using exemplars to develop academic self-efficacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(3), 460-471. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1666084

Dweck, C. S. (2008). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House Digital, Inc.

Earnshaw, Y., Tawfik, A. A., & Schmidt, M. (2017). User experience design. In R. E. West (Ed.), Foundations of learning and instructional design technology (pp.1-23). Press Books.

ElShaer, A., Casanova, D., Freestone, N. S., & Calabrese, G. (2020). Students’ perceptions of the value of electronic feedback. Does disciplinary background really matter? British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(2), 590-606. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12881

Fernandes, D. (2006). Para uma teoria da avaliação formativa. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 19(2), 21-50. https://revistas.rcaap.pt/rpe/issue/view/1421

Frohlich, D. M., Lim, C. S. C., & Ahmed, A. (2014). Keep, lose, change: Prompts for the re-design of product concepts in a focus group setting. CoDesign, 10(2), 80-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2013.862280

Gomes, M. J. (2009). Problemáticas da avaliação em educação online. In P. Dias & A. Osório (Eds.), Actas da Conferência Internacional de TIC na Educação: Challenges 2009 (pp. 1675-1693). Universidade do Minho, Centro de Competência TIC. https://hdl.handle.net/1822/9420

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F003465430298487

Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567-1579. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). Critical participatory action research. Springer.

Matusov, E., von Duyke, K., & Kayumova, S. (2016). Mapping concepts of agency in educational contexts. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50, 420-446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9336-0

Molloy, E., Boud, D., & Henderson, M. (2020). Developing a learning-centred framework for feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 527-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955

Moreira, J. A. M., Henriques, S., & Barros, D. (2020). Transitando de um ensino remoto emergencial para uma educação digital em rede, em tempos de pandemia. Dialogia, 34, 351-364. https://doi.org/10.5585/dialogia.n34.17123

Nieminen, J. H., & Hilppö, J. A. (2020). Methodological and conceptual suggestions for researching the interplay of assessment and student agency. In P. J. White, R. Tytler, J. Ferguson, & J. C. Clark (Eds.), Methodological approaches to STEM education research (v. 1, pp. 87-107). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Nieminen, J. H., & Tuohilampi, L. (2020). “Finally studying for myself”–Examining student agency in summative and formative self-assessment models. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(7), 1031–1045. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1720595

Pacheco, J. A., Sousa, J., & Maia, I. B. (2020). Conhecimento e aprendizagem na educação superior: Desafios curriculares e pedagógicos no século XXI. Revista Diálogo Educacional, 20(65), 528-557. http://dx.doi.org/10.7213/1981-416X.20.065.DS02

Pedro, N. (2017). Ambientes educativos inovadores: O estudo do fator espaço nas ‘salas de aula do futuro’ portuguesas. Revista Tempos e Espaços em Educação, 10(23), 99-108. https://doi.org/10.20952/revtee.v10i23.7448

Penuel, W. R., Roschelle, J., & Shechtman, N. (2007). Designing formative assessment software with teachers: An analysis of the co-design process. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(1), 51-74. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793206807000300

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Santos, J. R. (2018). O contributo das tecnologias digitais na transparência da avaliação digital no contexto de educação superior a distância. Universidade Aberta.

Twining, P., Heller, R. S., Nussbaum, M., & Tsai, C.-C. (2017). Some guidance on conducting and reporting qualitative studies. Computers & Education, 106, A1–A9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.002

Winstone, N. (2019). Facilitating students’ use of feedback: Capturing and tracking impact using digital tools. In M. Henderson, R. Ajjawi, D. Boud, & E. Molloy (Eds.), The impact of feedback in higher education (pp. 225-242). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25112-3_13

Winstone, N., Bourne, J., Medland, E., Niculescu, I., & Rees, R. (2021). “Check the grade, log out”: Students’ engagement with feedback in learning management systems. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(4), 631-643. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1787331

Winstone, N., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 17-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538

Winstone, N., Nash, R. A., Rowntree, J., & Menezes, R. (2016). What do students want most from written feedback information? Distinguishing necessities from luxuries using a budgeting methodology. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(8), 1237-1253. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1075956

Woodall, T., Hiller, A., & Resnick, S. (2014). Making sense of higher education: Students as consumers and the value of the university experience. Studies in Higher Education, 39(1), 48-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.6483