O ciclo de Produção dos Dados PISA no Brasil

A História dos Dados Além dos Números

Autores

  • Marialuisa Villani Investigadora independente, França

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25749/sis.15100

Palavras-chave:

PISA, INEP, ILSA, produção dos dados, modelo de referência

Resumo

Analisamos o processo de produção dos dados do programa de avaliação internacional PISA (Program for International Student Assessment), dirigido pela OCDE, no Brasil nas edições 2012 e 2015. Apresentamos dados qualitativos coletados em 2016 por meio de entrevistas semiestruturadas realizadas com a equipe do Instituto Nacional de Estudos e Pesquisas Educacionais Anísio Teixeira (INEP) que trabalhou no PISA no Brasil em 2012 e 2015. Realizamos uma etnografia dos dados do PISA para mostrar a incorporação dos aspectos sociais na produção dos dados estatísticos. Propomos uma abordagem consciente dos dados estatísticos, especialmente quando os resultados deste tipo de estudos são usados para descrever a complexidade dos sistemas educativos brasileiros. É possível individuar diferentes níveis de governança da produção dos dados estatísticos do PISA no Brasil. Isso produz uma distância e um desalinhamento que têm consequências na qualidade das informações difundidas através dos dados do PISA sobre o sistema escolar brasileiro.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia Autor

Marialuisa Villani, Investigadora independente, França

Phd in Social Systems, Organization and Policy Analysis at Sapienza University in Rome. Her thesis focused on Italian and French student university experience in Bologna reform context. In 2014/15, she decided to specialise in Statistic for Social Sciences at EHESS and ENS in Paris.  In 2016 she received Refeb fellowship from French Embassy in Brazil. Her ongoing research is about the relationship between national and international assessment in Southern-American countries, the production of statistical data and educational policy design implementation. In addition she is working on the self-academic construction of European Earlier career researchers. 

Referências

Bottani, N., & Vrignaud, P. (2005). La France et les évaluations internationales. Rapport pour l'haute Conseil de l'évaluation de l'école. Paris : Ministère de l’Éducation Nationale.

Carvalho, L. M. (2012). The Fabrications and Travels of a Knowledge-Policy Instrument. European Educational Research Journal, 11(2), 172-188. doi: 10.2304/eerj.2012.11.2.172

Davies, H. T. O., Nutley, S. M., & Smith, P. C. (2000). What works?: evidence-based policy and practice in public services. Bristol: Policy Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9302.00144

Desrosières, A. (2014). Prouver et Gouverner. Paris : La Découverte.

El Masri Y. H., Baird J., & Graesser A. (2016). Language effects in international testing: the case of PISA 2006 science items, Assessment. Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(4), 427-455. doi: 10.1080/0969594X.2016.121832

Felouzis, G., & Charmillot S. (2012). Les Enquêtes PISA. Paris : Puf.

Foucault, M. (2004). Sécurité, territoire, population. Cours au Collège de France (1977-1978). Paris : Seuil.

Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/225469

Grenet, J. (2008, February 8). PISA : une enquête bancale? . La vie des idées. Retrieved from http://www.laviedesidees.fr/PISA-une-enquete-bancale.html

Head, B. W. (2008). Three lenses of evidence-based policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(1), 1-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00564.x

Jerrim, J. (2016). PISA 2012: How do results for the paper and computer tests compare? Department of Quantitative Social Science Working Paper No. 16-02, February 2016, (16), 1-38.

Klein, R. (2011). Uma re-análise dos resultados do PISA: problemas de comparabilidade. Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas Em Educação, 19(73), 717-768. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-40362011000500002

Komatsu, H., & Rappleye, J. (2017). Did the shift to computer-based testing in PISA 2015 affect reading scores? A View from East Asia. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2017.1309864

Lascoumes, P. (2004). Présentation - La gouvernementalité : de la critique de l ’ État aux technologies du pouvoir. Le Portique, Revue de Philosophie et de Sciences Humaines, 14(13-14), 1-15. doi: https://doi.org/https://leportique.revues.org/625

Le Donné, N. (2015), Inégalités sociales de compétences (scolaires) et organisation du système éducatif. Études comparées à partir des enquêtes PISA de 2000 à 2009. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Science Po, Paris, France.

Lindblad, S., Pettersson, D., & Popkewitz, T. S. (2015). International Comparison of School Results. A sistematic review of a research on large scale assessments in education. Stockholm: Swedish Research Council. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23176.01286

Loveless, T. (2014). How well are American students learning. With the section on the PISA-Shanghai controversy, Homework and common core. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution—Brown Center. Retrieved from http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/reports/2001/9/education/09education.pdf

MEC/INEP. (2013). Relatório nacional PISA 2012: Resultados brasileiros. Brasilia. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264207486-11-de

MEC/INEP. (2016). Brasil no PISA 2015: análises e reflexões sobre o desempenho dos estudantes brasileiros. Brasilia. Retrieved from http://download.inep.gov.br/acoes_internacionais/pisa/resultados/2015/pisa2015_completo_final_baixa.pdf

Mons, N. (2007). Les nouvelles politiques éducatives. Paris : Puf.

Morgan, C. (2011). Constructing the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment. In M. Pereya (Ed.), PISA under examination: Changing Knowledge, Changing Tests, and Changing Schools (pp. 47-59). Rotterdam: Sense Publisher. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-740-0_4

Normand, R. (2015). L’enquête PISA : un objet-frontière des politiques éducatives. Administration & Éducation, 145(1), 121-126. Retrieved from https://www.cairn.info/revue-administration-et-education-2015-1-page-121.htm.

Nóvoa, A., & Yariv-Mashal, T. (2003). Comparative Research In Education: A mode of governance or a historical journey? Comparative Education, 93(4), 423-438.

OECD (1999). Measuring Student Knowledge and Skills: A New Framework for Assessment. Paris: OECD Edition.

OECD (2013). PISA 2012 Results: Excellence through Equity Giving Every Student the Chance to Succeed Volume II. Paris: OECD Edition.

OECD (2014). PISA 2012 Technical Report. Paris: OECD Edition.

OECD (2016a). PISA 2015 Technical Report. Paris: OECD Edition.

OECD (2016b). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education. Paris: OECD Edition.

Pettersson, D. (2008). International knowledge assessments: an element of national educational steering. (Doctoral dissertation) Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Uppsala Studies in Education No 120.

Pettersson, D. (2014). Three Narratives: National Interpretations of PISA. Knowledge Cultures, 2(4), 172-191.

Polanyi, K. (1977). The Economy Embedded in Society. In K. Polany (Ed.), The Livelihood of Man (pp. 47-56). New York: Academic Press.

Prais, S. J. (2003). Cautions on OECD’S Recent Educational Survey (PISA). Oxford Review of Education, 29(2), 139-163. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498032000080657

Rivas, A. (2015). Latin America after PISA: Lessons Learned about Education in Seven Countries. Buenos Aires: CIPPEC.

Robin, I. (2002). L'enquête PISA sur les compétences en lecture des élèves de 15 ans: Trois biais culturels en question. VEI Enjeux, 129(1), 65-91.

Schütz, A. (1976). Tiresias, or our knowledge of future events. In A. Schütz (Ed.), Tiresias, or our knowledge of future events (pp. 277-293). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.

Schwartzman, S. (2013). Uses and abuses of education assessment in Brazil. Prospects, 43(3), 269-288. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-013-9275-9

Scott, C. (2005, January). Measuring Up to the Measurement Problem The role of statistics. Evidence- based policy-making, London School of Economics. Research in Economics, United Kingdom. Retrieved from https://www.paris21.org/sites/default/files/MUMPS-full.pdf

Segone, M., & Pron, N. (2008). Bridging the gap. The role of Monitoring & Evaluation in Evidence-based policy making. UNICEF.

Strassheim, H., & Kettunen, P. (2014). When does evidence-based policy turn into policy-based evidence configurations, contexts and mechanisms. Evidence and Policy, 10(2), 259-277. doi: https://doi.org/10.1332/174426514X13990433991320

Turner, R., & Adams, R. J. (2007). The Programme for International Student Assessment: An Overview. Journal of Applied Measurement, 8(3), 237-248.

Downloads

Publicado

2018-10-31

Edição

Vol. 6 N.º 3 (2018): Temas de Investigação Educacional

Secção

Artigos

Licença

O Copyright (c) pertence à Sisyphus – Journal of Education. No entanto, encorajamos que os artigos publicados na revista sejam publicados noutros lugares, desde que seja solicitada a autorização da Sisyphus e os autores integrem a nossa citação de fonte original e um link para o nosso site.

Política de auto-arquivo
É permitido aos autores o auto-arquivo da versão final publicada dos seus artigos em repositórios institucionais, temáticos ou páginas web pessoais e institucionais.

Subscritor DORA
O Instituto de Educação da Universidade de Lisboa, editor da Sisyphus, é um dos subscritores da Declaração de São Francisco sobre Avaliação da Investigação (DORA).