Qualidades Psicométricas do Questionário de Aferição da Literacia em Avaliação (QALA)

Autores

  • Luis Almeida Universidade Lusófona, Portugal.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21814/rpe.24079

Palavras-chave:

Literacia em Avaliação, Avaliação das Aprendizagens, QALA, Propriedades psicométricas, Modelo Rasch

Resumo

A literacia em avaliação é uma característica fundamental que todo o professor deve ter, uma vez que a avaliação dos alunos está numa estreita relação com todo o processo de ensino e aprendizagem. pelo que deverá ser considerada um elemento-chave na melhoria do ensino. O objetivo do presente artigo foi o de analisar as propriedades psicométricas de um instrumento desenvolvido para aferir a literacia em avaliação dos professores do ensino básico e secundário: o QALA (Questionário de Aferição da Literacia em Avaliação). A análise das propriedades psicométricas do QALA foi realizada a partir do Modelo Rasch, que se assume como um conjunto de técnicas estatísticas que se inserem na Teoria de Resposta ao Item (TRI). Os resultados evidenciam as boas qualidades psicométricas do QALA, pelo que o instrumento parece ser adequado para o objetivo a que se propõe, nomeadamente para aferir as perceções que os professores têm sobre os seus conhecimentos e capacidades em avaliação, por um lado, e a sua literacia em avaliação, por outro.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Abell, S., & Siegel, M. (2011). Assessment Literacy: What science teachers need to know and be able to do. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The Professional Knowledge Base of Science Teaching. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3927-9_12

American Federation of Teachers, National Council on Measurement in Education, National Education Association (1990). The Standards for Competence in the Educational Assessment of Students. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext /ED323186.pdf.

Bond, T., & Fox, C. (2015). Applying the Rasch Model - Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315814698

Brown, G. (2008). Assessment literacy training and teachers' conceptions of assessment. In C. M. Rubie-Davies, & C. Rawlinson (Eds.), Challenging Thinking about Teaching and Learning (pp. 269-285). Nova Science Publishers.

Brown, T., & Bonsaksen, T. (2019). An examination of the structural validity of the Physical Self-Description Questionnaire-Short Form (PSDQ–S) using the Rasch Measurement Model. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1571146

Cadime, I., Santos, S., Leal, T., Viana, F., Rodrigues, B., Cosme, M. C., & Ribeiro, I. (2017). Compreensão de textos: diferenças em função da modalidade de apresentação da tarefa, tipo de texto e tipo de pergunta. Análise Psicológica, 3(35), 351-366. https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1234

Campbell, C., Murphy, J., & Holt, J. (2002, October). Psychometric analysis of an assessment literacy instrument: Applicability to preservice teachers [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Columbus, OH, USA.

Couto, G., & Primi, R. (2011). Teoria de Resposta ao Item (TRI): Conceitos elementares para itens dicotómicos. Boletim de Psicologia, 61(134), 1-15.

DeLuca, C., & Klinger, D. (2010). Assessment literacy development: identifying gaps in teacher candidates' learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 17(4), 419-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.516643

DeLuca, C., Chavez, T., Bellara, A., & Cao, C. (2013). Pedagogies for preservice assessment education: Supporting teacher candidates' assessment literacy development. The Teacher Educator, 48(2), 128-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2012.760024

Fernandes, D. (2022). Avaliar e aprender numa cultura de inovação pedagógica. Leya Educação.

Fidalgo, A., & Scalon, J. (2012). Uso dos métodos Mantel-Haenszel para a detecção do funcionamento diferencial dos itens e software relacionado. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 25(1), 66-68. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722012000100008

Fisher, W. (2007). Rating scale instrument quality criteria. Rasch Measurement Transaction, 21(1), 1095.

Franco, M., Anguita, L., Sanz, I., & Hidalgo, P. (2020). Development and Psychometric Properties of the Pressure Injury Prevention Knowledge Questionnaire in Spanish Nurses. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(2), 1-16. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390%2Fijerph17093063

González-de-Paz, L., Kostov, B., López-Pina, J., Solans-Julian, P., Navarro-Rubio, M., & Sisó-Almirall, A. (2018). A Rasch analysis of patients' opinions on primary health care professionals' ethic behaviour with respect to communication issues. Family Practice, 32(2), 237-243. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmu073

Granger, C. (2007). Rasch analysis is important to understand and use for measurement. Rasch Measurement Transaction, 21(3), 1122-1123. https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt213d.htm

Green, K. & Franton, C. (2002, Nov. 14-17). Survey development and validation with the Rasch Model. [Paper presentation]. International Conference on Questionnaire Development, Evaluation, and Testing, Charleston, SC, USA.

Hailaya, W., Alagumalai, S., & Ben. F. (2014). Examining the utility of Assessment Literacy Inventory and its portability to education systems in the Asia Pacific region. Australian Journal of Education, 58(3), 297-317. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0004944114542984

Koh, K. (2011). Improving teachers' assessment literacy through professional development. Teaching Education, 22(3), 255-276. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10476210.2011.593164

Lah, N., & Tasir, Z. (2018). Measuring Reliability and Validity of Questionnaire on Online Social Presence: A Rasch Model Analysis. Advanced Science Letters, 24(11), 7900-7903. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.12452

Linacre, J. (2020). A user's guide to Winstep Ministep Rasch-model computer programs. Winsteps.com.

Linacre, J. (2002). Optimizing Rating Scale Category Effectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3(1), 85-106.

Linacre, J., & Wright, B. (2002). Understanding Rasch measurement: Construction of measures from many-facets. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3(4), 486-512. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12486312/

Luckesi, C. (2005). Avaliação da aprendizagem escolar: Estudos e proposições. Cortez Editora.

Maia, L. (2012). El Modelo de Rasch aplicado a las Ciencias Psicológicas. Revista Eletrónica de Psicologia, Educação e Saúde, 2(1), 1-34.

McGee, J., & Colby, S. (2014). Impact of an assessment course on teacher candidates' assessment literacy. Action in Teacher Education, 36(5-6), 522-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2014.977753

Mertler, C. (2003, Oct. 15-18). Preservice versus inservice teachers' assessment literacy: Does classroom experience make a difference? [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Mertler, C. & Campbell, C. (2005, April 11-15). Measuring teachers' knowledge and application of classroom assessment concepts: Development of the Assessment Literacy Inventory [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.

Meyer, J. (2014). Applied measurement with jMetrik. Routledge.

Mofreh, S., Ghafar, M., Omar, A., Mosaku, M., & Ma'ruf, A. (2014). Psychometric Properties on Lecturers’ Beliefs on Teaching Function: Rasch Model Analysis. International Education Studies, 7(11), 47-55. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n11p47

Mohamad, M., Sulaiman, N., Sern, L., & Salleh, K. (2015). Measuring the Validity and Reliability of Research Instruments. Procedia - Social and Beahavioral Sciences, 204, 164-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.129

Neto, A., & Aquino, J. (2009). A avaliação da aprendizagem como ato amoroso: o que o professor pratica?. Educação em Revista, 25(2), 223-240. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-46982009000200010

Plake, B., Impara, J., & Fager, J. (1993). Assessment competencies of teachers: A national survey. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(4), 10-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1993.tb00548.x

Popham, W. (2011). Assessment literacy overlooked: A teacher educator’s confession. The Teacher Educator, 46(4), 265–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2011.605048

Prieto, G., & Delgado, A. (2003). Análisis de un test mediant el modelo de Rasch. Psicothema, 15(1), 94-100. https://www.psicothema.com/pdf/1029.pdf

Ramesal, A. (2011). Primary and secondary teachers' conceptions of assessment: a qualitative study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 472-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.09.017

Ribeiro, L. (1993). Avaliação da aprendizagem. Texto Editora.

Robison, M., Johnson, A., Walton, D., & MacDermid, J. (2019). A comparison of the polytomous Rasch analysis output of RUMM2030 and R (ltm/eRm/TAM/lordif). BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0680-5

Santiago, P., Donaldson, G., Looney, A., & Nusche, D. (2012). OECD reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education: Portugal 2012. OECD Publishing.

Santos, L. (2016). A articulação entre avaliação somativa e a formativa na prática pedagógica: uma impossibilidade ou um desafio?. Ensaio-Avaliação e Políticas Públicas, 24(94), 637-669. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-40362016000300006

Stiggins, R. (1991). Assessment literacy. Phi Delta Kappan, 72, 534-539.

Stiggins, R. (1995). Assessment literacy for the 21st century. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(3), 238-246.

Taber, K. (2017). The use of Cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Vieira, M., Ribeiro, R., & Almeida, L. (2009). As potencialidades da Teoria de Resposta ao Item na validade dos testes: Aplicação a uma prova de dependência-independência de campo. Análise Psicológica, 27(4), 455-462.

Volante, L., & Fazio, X. (2007). Exploring Teacher candidates' assessment literacy: implications for teacher education. Canadian Journal of Education, 30(3), 749-770. https://doi.org/10.2307/20466661

Xu, Y., & Brown, G. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 149-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010

Yamtim, V., & Wongwanich, S. (2014). A study of classroom assessment literacy of primary school teachers. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2998-3004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.696

Downloads

Publicado

2023-03-31

Como Citar

Almeida, L. (2023). Qualidades Psicométricas do Questionário de Aferição da Literacia em Avaliação (QALA). Revista Portuguesa De Educação, 36(1), e23007. https://doi.org/10.21814/rpe.24079