Estratégias de ensino promotoras de Corregulação das Aprendizagens no Ensino a Distância: Uma revisão integrativa da literatura

Fernanda Cristina Ribeiro Faria; Daniela Cristina Carneiro Pedrosa; Betina da Silva Lopes; Rodrigo Faria

doi:10.21814/rpe.35847

Autores

Fernanda Cristina Ribeiro Faria Universidade de Aveiro, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5694-8250
Daniela Cristina Carneiro Pedrosa Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9536-4234
Betina da Silva Lopes Universidade de Aveiro, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0669-1650
Rodrigo Faria Universidade de Aveiro, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1705-1539

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21814/rpe.35847

Palavras-chave:

Corregulação da aprendizagem, Estratégias de ensino, Educação a distância, Regulação social da aprendizagem, Revisão integrativa da literatura

Resumo

O artigo aborda a necessidade de ecossistemas educacionais apropriados para a Educação Superior a Distância devido ao cenário desafiador no qual está inserido. Embora haja estudos sobre as abordagens de ensino, o mesmo não é observado sobre estratégias de ensino, notadamente as estratégias de Corregulação das Aprendizagens (CoRA). O objetivo era identificar estratégias de CoRA adotadas no Ensino a Distância (EaD). Foi conduzida uma revisão integrativa da literatura em três bases de dados, onde se identificaram 345 estudos, dos quais, quatro foram elegíveis. As categorias referentes às estratégias foram obtidas a partir de análise temática dos excertos. Os resultados evidenciaram a lacuna existente na literatura referente às estratégias de CoRA no EaD. Uma matriz foi desenvolvida para referenciar as estratégias observadas nas fases de CoRA. Observou-se a falta de estratégias específicas nas fases de coplanejamento, comonitoramento e correflexão. A criação de um referencial de estratégias servirá de orientação para futuras pesquisas que se ocupem de estratégias de regulação social, particularmente a CoRA. Também se reconhece a relação intrínseca entre o planejamento e as estratégias de corregulação das aprendizagens.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Allal, L. (2011). Pedagogy, didactics and the co-regulation of learning: A perspective from the French-language world of educational research. Research Papers in Education, 26(3), 329–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2011.595542

Banson, J. (2022). Co-regulated learning and online learning: A systematic review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 6(1), e100376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100376

Bao, W. (2020). COVID‐19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.191

Beck, D., Morgado, L., & O’Shea, P. (2023). Educational practices and strategies with immersive learning environments: Mapping of reviews for using the metaverse. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 319–341. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2023.3243946

Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007

Brown, A. H., & Green, T. D. (2019). The Essentials of Instructional Design. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429439698

Cohen, M. T. (2012). The importance of self-regulation for college student learning. College Student Journal, 46(4), 892–902.

Dunn, K. E., Rakes, G. C., & Rakes, T. A. (2014). Influence of academic self-regulation, critical thinking, and age on online graduate students’ academic help-seeking. Distance Education, 35(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2014.891426

Freitas, V. (2021). Parsifal (Version 2.2) [Computer software]. Parsifal. https://parsif.al/

Ergulec, F. (2019). Design and Facilitation Strategies Used in Asynchronous Online Discussions. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(2), 20–36. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1213976

Hadwin, A., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2017). Self-regulation, co-regulation, and shared regulation in collaborative learning environments. In D. H. Schunk & J. A. Greene (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (2nd Ed., pp. 83–106). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315697048-6

Hsu, Y. C., Baldwin, S., & Ching, Y. H. (2017). Learning through making and maker education. TechTrends, 61(6), 589–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0172-6

Huang, Y. M., Chen, M. Y., & Mo, S. S. (2015). How do we inspire people to contact aboriginal culture with Web2.0 technology? Computers & Education, 86, 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.001

Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., & Malmberg, J. (2019). Capturing the dynamic and cyclical nature of regulation: Methodological progress in understanding socially shared regulation in learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14(4), 425–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-019-09313-2

Kaplan, J. (2019). Putting to test a model of self-evaluation of the learning method in an e-learning environment. In M. Tsitouridou, J. A. Diniz & T. A. Mikropoulos (Eds.), Technology and Innovation in Learning, Teaching and Education: First International Conference, TECH-EDU 2018, Thessaloniki, Greece, June 20–22, 2018, revised selected papers (pp. 3–12). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20954-4_1

Martínez Uribe, C. H. (2008). La educación a distancia: Sus características y necesidad en la educación actual. Educación, 17(33), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.18800/educacion.200802.001

Mendes, K. D. S., Silveira, R. C. C. P., & Galvão, C. M. (2008). Revisão integrativa: Método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Texto & Contexto: Enfermagem, 17(4), 758–764. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-07072008000400018

Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (2007). Educação a distância: Uma visão integrada (Roberto Galman, Trad.). Thomson Learning.

Moreno, J., Sanabria, L., & López, O. (2016). Theoretical and conceptual approaches to co-regulation: A theoretical review. Psychology, 7(13), 1587–1607. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2016.713153

Motta, E., Cattaneo, A., & Gurtner, J. L. (2017). Co-regulations of learning in small groups of chef apprentices: When do they appear and what influences them? Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 9, e15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-017-0059-y

Oermann, M. H., & Knafl, K. A. (2021). Strategies for completing a successful integrative review. Nurse Author & Editor, 31(3–4), 65–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/nae2.30

Patias, N. D., & Von Hohendorff, J. (2019). Critérios de qualidade para artigos de pesquisa qualitativa. Psicologia em Estudo, 24, e43536. https://doi.org/10.4025/psicolestud.v24i0.43536

Pedrosa, D., Cravino, J., Morgado, L., & Barreira, C. (2019). Co-regulated learning in computer programming: Students co-reflection about learning strategies adopted during an assignment. In M. Tsitouridou, J. A. Diniz & T. A. Mikropoulos (Eds.), Technology and Innovation in Learning, Teaching and Education: First International Conference, TECH-EDU 2018, Thessaloniki, Greece, June 20–22, 2018, revised selected papers (pp. 13–28). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20954-4_2

Pedrosa, D., Morgado, L., & Cravino, J. (2022). A strategy to support engineering education teaching staff monitoring students’ learning process: Metacognitive challenges. In R. M. Lima, M. Farreras, M. Romá & V. Villas-Boas (Eds.), International Symposium on Project Approaches in Engineering Education (Vol. 12, pp. 295–303). PAEE Association; School of Engineering of University of Minho. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7062198

Ribeiro Faria, F. C., Pedrosa, D., Lopes, B., & Faria, R. (2022). Conceptual overview on CoRL: Narrative literature review. In L. Gómez-Chova, A. López Martínez & J. Lees (Eds.), 15th Annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation: Conference proceedings (pp. 7490–7498). IATED Academy. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2022.1903

Ribeiro Faria, F. C., Pedrosa, D., Silva Lopes, B., & Faria, R. (2024). Instructional design and co-regulation learning strategies in distance education: A framework proposal. In L. Gómez-Chova, A. López Martínez & J. Lees (Eds.), 18th International Technology, Education and Development Conference: Conference proceedings (pp. 4092–4095). IATED Academy. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2024.1049

Rich, J. V. (2017). Proposing a model of co-regulated learning for graduate medical education. Academic Medicine, 92(8), 1100–1104. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001583

Shadiev, R., Hwang, W. Y., Chen, N. S., & Huang, Y. M. (2014). Review of speech-to-text recognition technology for enhancing learning. Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 65–84. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.17.4.65

Sharp, L., & Sharp, J. (2016). Enhancing student success in online learning experiences through the use of self-regulation strategies. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 27, 57–75. https://celt.miamioh.edu/index.php/JECT/article/view/389

Stern, C., Jordan, Z., & McArthur, A. (2014). Developing the review question and inclusion criteria. American Journal of Nursing, 114(4), 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000445689.67800.86

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between Learning and Development. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (pp. 79–91). Harvard University Press.

Sun, J. C. Y., Tsai, H. E., & Cheng, W. K. R. (2023). Effects of integrating an open learner model with AI-enabled visualization on students’ self-regulation strategies usage and behavioral patterns in an online research ethics course. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100120

Ursi, E. S., & Galvão, C. M. (2006). Prevenção de lesões de pele no perioperatório: Revisão integrativa da literatura. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 14(1), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692006000100017

Vaismoradi, M., Jones, J., Turunen, H., & Snelgrove, S. (2016). Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 6(5), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v6n5p100

Wang, C. H., Shannon, D. M., & Ross, M. E. (2013). Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3), 302–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.835779

Wang, Y. P., & Wu, T. J. (2022). Effects of online cooperative learning on students’ problem-solving ability and learning satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, e817968. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.817968

Zapata Ros, M., & Martínez-García, J. J. (2001). Modelos institucionales de educación a distancia. RED: Revista de Educación a Distancia, 1(1). https://revistas.um.es/red/article/view/25191

Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.794676