Analysis of students’ visual representation ability in physics based on empirical test results on the topic of rotational dynamics in the context of the traditional game of gasing

Rio Sebastian; Heru Kuswanto

doi:10.21814/rpe.36288

Autores

Rio Sebastian Yogyakarta State University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4041-1325
Heru Kuswanto Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2693-8078

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21814/rpe.36288

Palavras-chave:

Representação visual, Dinâmica rotacional, Jogo tradicional do pião

Resumo

A capacidade de representação visual desempenha um papel fundamental no processo de aprendizagem da Física, pois auxilia os estudantes na compreensão abrangente e conceptual dos fenómenos físicos. No entanto, essa competência ainda representa um desafio significativo para muitos alunos. Assim, este estudo tem como objetivo investigar as habilidades de representação visual dos estudantes por meio de testes empíricos, na forma de respostas escritas, sobre o tema da dinâmica rotacional, utilizando como contexto o jogo tradicional do pião. A pesquisa adota uma abordagem quantitativa descritiva, procurando avaliar a capacidade de representação visual a partir de questões discursivas elaboradas com base em indicadores específicos dessa competência. Os resultados revelam que a maioria dos estudantes apresenta um nível muito baixo de representação visual, sendo que 52% se enquadram nessa categoria. Além disso, com base nas pontuações médias obtidas nos diferentes indicadores, todos foram classificados como baixos. O indicador relacionado com a análise de imagens, diagramas, tabelas ou gráficos para a elaboração de conclusões apresentou a menor média. Dessa forma, conclui-se que a capacidade de representação visual dos estudantes na aprendizagem da Física, especialmente no contexto da dinâmica rotacional associada ao jogo tradicional do pião, ainda é limitada. Portanto, tornam-se necessários esforços para aprimorar essa competência por meio de atividades inovadoras e adequadas ao ensino de Física.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Abdurrahman, A., Setyaningsih, C. A., & Jalmo, T. (2019). Implementing multiple representation-based worksheet to develop critical thinking skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1), 138–155. https://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/235

Adams, R. J., & Khoo, S.-T. (1996). ACER Quest: The interactive test analysis system (Version 2.1) [Computer software]. Australian Council for Educational Research. https://research.acer.edu.au/measurement/3/

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012

Ainsworth, S. E., & Scheiter, K. (2021). Learning by drawing visual representations: Potential, purposes, and practical implications. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420979582

Akerson, V. L., Carter, I., Pongsanon, K., & Nargund-Joshi, V. (2019). Teaching and learning nature of science in elementary classrooms. Science & Education, 28(3–5), 391–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00045-1

Anam, R. S., Gumilar, S., & Widodo, A. (2024). The use of the Constructivist Teaching Sequence (CTS) to facilitate changes in the visual representations of fifth-grade elementary school students: A case study on teaching heat convection concepts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 22(1), 73–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10358-x

Bao, L., & Koenig, K. (2019). Physics education research for 21st century learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1, Article e2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0007-8

Beck, C., & Barbato, F. (2022). Physics for secure and efficient societies. Europhysics News, 53(5), 36–39. https://doi.org/10.1051/epn/2022506

Berndt, A. E. (2020). Sampling methods. Journal of Human Lactation, 36(2), 224–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334420906850

Bollen, L., van Kampen, P., Baily, C., Kelly, M., & De Cock, M. (2017). Student difficulties regarding symbolic and graphical representations of vector fields. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), Article e020109. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020109

Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4

Bostan Sarıoğlan, A., & Küçüközer, H. (2013). Determination of conceptions of secondary 10th grade students about torque, angular momentum and Kepler’s 2nd Law. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 7(1), 121–141. https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/154911/determination-of-conceptions-of-secondary-10th-grade-students-about-torque-angular-momentum-and-keplers-2nd-law

Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD.

De Cock, M. (2012). Representation use and strategy choice in physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics Physics Education Research, 8(2), Article e020117. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020117

Dewi, I. N., Ibrahim, M., Poedjiastoeti, S., Prahani, B. K., Setiawan, D., & Sumarjan, S. (2019). Effectiveness of Local Wisdom Integrated (LWI) learning model to improve scientific communication skills of junior high school students in science learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(2), Article e022014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022014

Dolgopolovas, V., Dagiene, V., Pozdniakov, S., & Liaptsev, A. (2022). Developing computational thinking skills to foster student research: Contemporary scientific education through modeling and simulations. In N. Rezaei (Ed.), Integrated education and learning (pp. 417–443). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15963-3_23

Elia, I., Gagatsis, A., & Demetriou, A. (2007). The effects of different modes of representation on the solution of one-step additive problems. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 658–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.011

Etkina, E. (2023). When learning physics mirrors doing physics. Physics Today, 76(10), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.5324

Febriyanti, C., Prasetya, R., & Irawan, A. (2018). Etnomatematika pada permainan tradisional engklek dan gasing khas kebudayaan Sunda. Barekeng: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika Dan Terapan, 12(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.30598/vol12iss1pp1-6ar358

Glazer, N. (2011). Challenges with graph interpretation: A review of the literature. Studies in Science Education, 47(2), 183–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.605307

Ho, Y.-R., Chen, B.-Y., Li, C.-M., & Chai, E. G.-Y. (2023). The distance between the humanities and medicine: Building a critical thinking mindset by interdisciplinary dialogue through mind mapping. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 50, Article e101420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101420

Ioannidou, O., & Erduran, S. (2021). Beyond hypothesis testing: Investigating the diversity of scientific methods in science teachers’ understanding. Science & Education, 30(2), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00185-9

Kaya, E., Erduran, S., Aksoz, B., & Akgun, S. (2019). Reconceptualised family resemblance approach to nature of science in pre-service science teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 41(1), 21–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1529447

Kladivová, M., & Mucha, L. (2014). Physical pendulum: A simple experiment can give comprehensive information about a rigid body. European Journal of Physics, 35(2), Article e025018. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/35/2/0255018

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2020). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003099857

Maknun, J. (2020). Implementation of guided inquiry learning model to improve understanding physics concepts and critical thinking skill of vocational high school students. International Education Studies, 13(6), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n6p117

Maries, A., & Singh, C. (2023). Helping students become proficient problem solvers Part I: A brief review. Education Sciences, 13(2), Article e156. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/13/2/156

Mashood, K. K., & Singh, V. A. (2012). An inventory on rotational kinematics of a particle: Unravelling misconceptions and pitfalls in reasoning. European Journal of Physics, 33(5), Article e1301. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/33/5/1301

Matsyshyn, O. (2023). Toys or physics? Explaining physics through toys. WS Education. https://doi.org/10.1142/13547

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED530802

Nasrun, Prahmana, R. C. I., & Akib, I. (2023). The students’ representative processes in solving mathematical word problems. Knowledge, 3(1), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge3010006

Nazhifah, N., Wiyono, K., & Ismet, I. (2023). Development of STEM-based e-learning on renewable energy topic to improve the students creative thinking skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 9575–9585. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5206

Novitasari, P., Usodo, B., & Fitriana, L. (2021). Visual, symbolic, and verbal mathematics representation abilities in junior high school’s students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1808(1), Article e012046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1808/1/012046

Olazabal, L., Sarriugarte, P., Zuza, K., & Guisasola, J. (2021). Analyzing the upper secondary school students’ difficulties in the rotation of rigid body. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1929(1), Article e012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1929/1/012008

Park, J., Chang, J., Tang, K.-S., Treagust, D. F., & Won, M. (2020). Sequential patterns of students’ drawing in constructing scientific explanations: Focusing on the interplay among three levels of pictorial representation. International Journal of Science Education, 42(5), 677–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1724351

Pulgar, J., Fahler, V., & Spina, A. (2021). Investigating how university students collaborate to compose physics problems through structured tasks. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(1), Article e010120. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010120

Ramadhan, M. F., Mundilarto, M., Ariswan, A., Irwanto, I., Bahtiar, B., & Gummah, S. (2023). The effect of interface instrumentation experiments-supported blended learning on students’ critical thinking skills and academic achievement. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 17(14), 101–125. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i14.38611

Rimoldini, L. G., & Singh, C. (2005). Student understanding of rotational and rolling motion concepts. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 1(1), Article e010102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.1.010102

Riyan Rizaldi, D., Doyan, A., Makhrus, M., Fatimah, Z., & Nurhayati, E. (2021). Adaptation to new normal conditions: Students physics learning outcomes using the blended learning model. International Journal of Asian Education, 2(3), 369–376. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v2i3.171

Saprima, T., Etriadi, & Nasrullah. (2020). Permainan gasing di Sambas. Jurnal Sambas (Studi Agama, Masyarakat, Budaya, Adat, Sejarah), 3(1), 13–27. http://journal.iaisambas.ac.id/index.php/SAMBAS/article/download/194/153

Sebastian, R., Kuswanto, H., Jumadi, J., & Putri-Haspari, N. P. (2023). Effectiveness of flip-book optic devices based on problem based learning assisted with virtual laboratory simulation to improve high school students’ visual representation. Revista Cubana de Física, 40(2), 90–97.

Sherinnova, Hijriyah, U., Irwandani, Rahmayanti, H., Ichsan, I. Z., Nurfadhilah, & Sison, M. H. (2023). Contextual teaching and learning in natural science and environmental topic of elementary school, secondary school, and university: A meta-analysis study. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2595(1), Article e040014. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0124176

Singh, A. S., & Masuku, M. B. (2014). Sampling techniques & determination of sample size in applied statistics research: An overview. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 2(11), 1–22. http://ijecm.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/21131.pdf

Subali, B., & Suyata, P. (2012). Pengembangan item tes konvergen dan divergen dan penyelidikan validitasnya secara empiris. Diandra Pustaka Indonesia.

Syamsi, I., & Tahar, M. M. (2021). Local wisdom-based character education for special needs students in inclusive elementary schools. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(6), 3329–3342. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i6.6567

Tytler, R., Prain, V., Aranda, G., Ferguson, J., & Gorur, R. (2020). Drawing to reason and learn in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21590

Utami, C. T. P., Mardiyana, & Triyanto. (2019). The identification of visual representation ability of junior high school students in solving geometry problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1180(1), Article e012014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1180/1/012014

Volkwyn, T. S., Airey, J., Gregorcic, B., & Linder, C. (2020). Developing representational competence: Linking real-world motion to physics concepts through graphs. Learning: Research and Practice, 6(1), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2020.1750670

Widoyoko, S. E. P. (2012). Teknik penyusunan instrumen penelitian. Pustaka Pelajar.

Widyaparamita, Saehana, S., & Darmadi, I. W. (2020). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Fisika dengan Media Permainan Gasing dan Permainan Perahu terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa SMP Negeri 2 Sigi. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako, 8(2), 45–48. https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/1774044

Ye, K., Ni, W., Krieger, M., Ma’ayan, D., Wise, J., Aldrich, J., Sunshine, J., & Crane, K. (2020). Penrose: From mathematical notation to beautiful diagrams. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 39(4), Article e144. https://doi.org/10.1145/3386569.3392375