Análisis de la capacidad de representación visual de los estudiantes en física basada en los resultados de pruebas empíricas sobre el tema de la dinámica rotacional en el contexto del juego tradicional del trompo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21814/rpe.36288Palabras clave:
Representación visual, Dinámica rotacional, Juego tradicional del trompoResumen
La capacidad de representación visual desempeña un papel fundamental en el aprendizaje de la Física, ya que permite a los estudiantes desarrollar una comprensión integral y conceptual de los fenómenos físicos. Sin embargo, esta competencia continúa siendo un desafío significativo para muchos alumnos. Por ello, el presente estudio tiene como objetivo examinar las habilidades de representación visual de los estudiantes mediante pruebas empíricas de respuesta escrita sobre el tema de la dinámica rotacional, utilizando como caso de estudio el juego tradicional del trompo (gasing). La investigación adopta un enfoque cuantitativo descriptivo para evaluar dicha capacidad a través de preguntas discursivas elaboradas con base en indicadores específicos de representación visual. Los resultados muestran que la mayoría de los estudiantes presenta un nivel muy bajo de representación visual, con un 52% clasificado en esta categoría. Asimismo, los puntajes promedio obtenidos en todos los indicadores se situaron en niveles bajos. El indicador relacionado con el análisis de imágenes, diagramas, tablas o gráficos para extraer conclusiones registró la media más baja. En consecuencia, se concluye que la capacidad de representación visual de los estudiantes en el aprendizaje de la Física, particularmente en el contexto de la dinámica rotacional y el juego tradicional del trompo, sigue siendo limitada. Por lo tanto, se requieren esfuerzos para fortalecer esta competencia mediante actividades innovadoras y adecuadas en la enseñanza de la Física.
Descargas
Citas
Abdurrahman, A., Setyaningsih, C. A., & Jalmo, T. (2019). Implementing multiple representation-based worksheet to develop critical thinking skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(1), 138–155. https://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/235
Adams, R. J., & Khoo, S.-T. (1996). ACER Quest: The interactive test analysis system (Version 2.1) [Computer software]. Australian Council for Educational Research. https://research.acer.edu.au/measurement/3/
Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
Ainsworth, S. E., & Scheiter, K. (2021). Learning by drawing visual representations: Potential, purposes, and practical implications. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420979582
Akerson, V. L., Carter, I., Pongsanon, K., & Nargund-Joshi, V. (2019). Teaching and learning nature of science in elementary classrooms. Science & Education, 28(3–5), 391–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00045-1
Anam, R. S., Gumilar, S., & Widodo, A. (2024). The use of the Constructivist Teaching Sequence (CTS) to facilitate changes in the visual representations of fifth-grade elementary school students: A case study on teaching heat convection concepts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 22(1), 73–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-023-10358-x
Bao, L., & Koenig, K. (2019). Physics education research for 21st century learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1, Article e2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0007-8
Beck, C., & Barbato, F. (2022). Physics for secure and efficient societies. Europhysics News, 53(5), 36–39. https://doi.org/10.1051/epn/2022506
Berndt, A. E. (2020). Sampling methods. Journal of Human Lactation, 36(2), 224–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334420906850
Bollen, L., van Kampen, P., Baily, C., Kelly, M., & De Cock, M. (2017). Student difficulties regarding symbolic and graphical representations of vector fields. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), Article e020109. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020109
Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4
Bostan Sarıoğlan, A., & Küçüközer, H. (2013). Determination of conceptions of secondary 10th grade students about torque, angular momentum and Kepler’s 2nd Law. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 7(1), 121–141. https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/154911/determination-of-conceptions-of-secondary-10th-grade-students-about-torque-angular-momentum-and-keplers-2nd-law
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD.
De Cock, M. (2012). Representation use and strategy choice in physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics Physics Education Research, 8(2), Article e020117. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020117
Dewi, I. N., Ibrahim, M., Poedjiastoeti, S., Prahani, B. K., Setiawan, D., & Sumarjan, S. (2019). Effectiveness of Local Wisdom Integrated (LWI) learning model to improve scientific communication skills of junior high school students in science learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(2), Article e022014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022014
Dolgopolovas, V., Dagiene, V., Pozdniakov, S., & Liaptsev, A. (2022). Developing computational thinking skills to foster student research: Contemporary scientific education through modeling and simulations. In N. Rezaei (Ed.), Integrated education and learning (pp. 417–443). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15963-3_23
Elia, I., Gagatsis, A., & Demetriou, A. (2007). The effects of different modes of representation on the solution of one-step additive problems. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 658–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.011
Etkina, E. (2023). When learning physics mirrors doing physics. Physics Today, 76(10), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.5324
Febriyanti, C., Prasetya, R., & Irawan, A. (2018). Etnomatematika pada permainan tradisional engklek dan gasing khas kebudayaan Sunda. Barekeng: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika Dan Terapan, 12(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.30598/vol12iss1pp1-6ar358
Glazer, N. (2011). Challenges with graph interpretation: A review of the literature. Studies in Science Education, 47(2), 183–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.605307
Ho, Y.-R., Chen, B.-Y., Li, C.-M., & Chai, E. G.-Y. (2023). The distance between the humanities and medicine: Building a critical thinking mindset by interdisciplinary dialogue through mind mapping. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 50, Article e101420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101420
Ioannidou, O., & Erduran, S. (2021). Beyond hypothesis testing: Investigating the diversity of scientific methods in science teachers’ understanding. Science & Education, 30(2), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00185-9
Kaya, E., Erduran, S., Aksoz, B., & Akgun, S. (2019). Reconceptualised family resemblance approach to nature of science in pre-service science teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 41(1), 21–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1529447
Kladivová, M., & Mucha, L. (2014). Physical pendulum: A simple experiment can give comprehensive information about a rigid body. European Journal of Physics, 35(2), Article e025018. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/35/2/0255018
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2020). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003099857
Maknun, J. (2020). Implementation of guided inquiry learning model to improve understanding physics concepts and critical thinking skill of vocational high school students. International Education Studies, 13(6), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n6p117
Maries, A., & Singh, C. (2023). Helping students become proficient problem solvers Part I: A brief review. Education Sciences, 13(2), Article e156. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/13/2/156
Mashood, K. K., & Singh, V. A. (2012). An inventory on rotational kinematics of a particle: Unravelling misconceptions and pitfalls in reasoning. European Journal of Physics, 33(5), Article e1301. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/33/5/1301
Matsyshyn, O. (2023). Toys or physics? Explaining physics through toys. WS Education. https://doi.org/10.1142/13547
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED530802
Nasrun, Prahmana, R. C. I., & Akib, I. (2023). The students’ representative processes in solving mathematical word problems. Knowledge, 3(1), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge3010006
Nazhifah, N., Wiyono, K., & Ismet, I. (2023). Development of STEM-based e-learning on renewable energy topic to improve the students creative thinking skills. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 9575–9585. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5206
Novitasari, P., Usodo, B., & Fitriana, L. (2021). Visual, symbolic, and verbal mathematics representation abilities in junior high school’s students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1808(1), Article e012046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1808/1/012046
Olazabal, L., Sarriugarte, P., Zuza, K., & Guisasola, J. (2021). Analyzing the upper secondary school students’ difficulties in the rotation of rigid body. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1929(1), Article e012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1929/1/012008
Park, J., Chang, J., Tang, K.-S., Treagust, D. F., & Won, M. (2020). Sequential patterns of students’ drawing in constructing scientific explanations: Focusing on the interplay among three levels of pictorial representation. International Journal of Science Education, 42(5), 677–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1724351
Pulgar, J., Fahler, V., & Spina, A. (2021). Investigating how university students collaborate to compose physics problems through structured tasks. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(1), Article e010120. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010120
Ramadhan, M. F., Mundilarto, M., Ariswan, A., Irwanto, I., Bahtiar, B., & Gummah, S. (2023). The effect of interface instrumentation experiments-supported blended learning on students’ critical thinking skills and academic achievement. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 17(14), 101–125. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i14.38611
Rimoldini, L. G., & Singh, C. (2005). Student understanding of rotational and rolling motion concepts. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 1(1), Article e010102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.1.010102
Riyan Rizaldi, D., Doyan, A., Makhrus, M., Fatimah, Z., & Nurhayati, E. (2021). Adaptation to new normal conditions: Students physics learning outcomes using the blended learning model. International Journal of Asian Education, 2(3), 369–376. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v2i3.171
Saprima, T., Etriadi, & Nasrullah. (2020). Permainan gasing di Sambas. Jurnal Sambas (Studi Agama, Masyarakat, Budaya, Adat, Sejarah), 3(1), 13–27. http://journal.iaisambas.ac.id/index.php/SAMBAS/article/download/194/153
Sebastian, R., Kuswanto, H., Jumadi, J., & Putri-Haspari, N. P. (2023). Effectiveness of flip-book optic devices based on problem based learning assisted with virtual laboratory simulation to improve high school students’ visual representation. Revista Cubana de Física, 40(2), 90–97.
Sherinnova, Hijriyah, U., Irwandani, Rahmayanti, H., Ichsan, I. Z., Nurfadhilah, & Sison, M. H. (2023). Contextual teaching and learning in natural science and environmental topic of elementary school, secondary school, and university: A meta-analysis study. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2595(1), Article e040014. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0124176
Singh, A. S., & Masuku, M. B. (2014). Sampling techniques & determination of sample size in applied statistics research: An overview. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 2(11), 1–22. http://ijecm.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/21131.pdf
Subali, B., & Suyata, P. (2012). Pengembangan item tes konvergen dan divergen dan penyelidikan validitasnya secara empiris. Diandra Pustaka Indonesia.
Syamsi, I., & Tahar, M. M. (2021). Local wisdom-based character education for special needs students in inclusive elementary schools. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(6), 3329–3342. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i6.6567
Tytler, R., Prain, V., Aranda, G., Ferguson, J., & Gorur, R. (2020). Drawing to reason and learn in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(2), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21590
Utami, C. T. P., Mardiyana, & Triyanto. (2019). The identification of visual representation ability of junior high school students in solving geometry problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1180(1), Article e012014. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1180/1/012014
Volkwyn, T. S., Airey, J., Gregorcic, B., & Linder, C. (2020). Developing representational competence: Linking real-world motion to physics concepts through graphs. Learning: Research and Practice, 6(1), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2020.1750670
Widoyoko, S. E. P. (2012). Teknik penyusunan instrumen penelitian. Pustaka Pelajar.
Widyaparamita, Saehana, S., & Darmadi, I. W. (2020). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Fisika dengan Media Permainan Gasing dan Permainan Perahu terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa SMP Negeri 2 Sigi. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako, 8(2), 45–48. https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/1774044
Ye, K., Ni, W., Krieger, M., Ma’ayan, D., Wise, J., Aldrich, J., Sunshine, J., & Crane, K. (2020). Penrose: From mathematical notation to beautiful diagrams. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 39(4), Article e144. https://doi.org/10.1145/3386569.3392375
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Rio Sebastian, Heru Kuswanto
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.
1. Los autores y autoras conservan los derechos de autor y conceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación, con el trabajo simultáneamente disponible bajo la Licencia Creative Commons Attribution que permite compartir el trabajo con el reconocimiento de la autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.
2. Los autores y autoras pueden asumir contratos adicionales separadamente para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del trabajo publicada en esta revista (por ejemplo, depositar en un repositorio institucional o como capítulo de libro), con el reconocimiento de la autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.
3. Los autores y autoras están autorizados y son incitados/as a publicar y compartir su trabajo en línea (por ejemplo, en repositorios institucionales o páginas personales) antes o durante el proceso editorial, pues puede dar lugar a modificaciones productivas o aumentar el impacto y las citas del trabajo publicado (Véase El Efecto del Acceso Libre).
Esta obra está disponible bajo la Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-CompartirIgual 4.0.
