Assess to learn in experimental sciences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21814/rpe.21275Keywords:
Formative assessment, Experimental sciences learning, Scientific skills, Investigative and practical activitiesAbstract
This article presents a study that aims to understand how a middle school Portuguese teacher develops assessment practices in Natural Sciences to guide and support the learning development. An interpretative methodology was followed, using a case study design. Teacher Eva is the case of this study. Interviews, class observation and documental research were used to collect data. Content analysis methodology was performed. The results show that Eva’s formative assessment practices reflect the importance of students to learn about science and to think about science, in an Inquiry Based Science Education approach. These practices, formal and informal in nature, are a way to contribute to teaching and learning. In order to gather evidence to improve the development of the students’ scientific competences, Eva uses oral and written feedback, learning objectives and assessment criteria in an explicit form, and the promotion of student collaborative work. To these strategies, Eva adds a careful selection of investigative structured tasks, oriented and open inquiry. The implications for teacher’s professional development are oriented by a dialogue of assessment practices.
Downloads
References
Bell, R., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction: Assessing the inquiry level of classroom activities. The Science Teacher, 72(7), 30-33. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228665515
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 551-575. http://doi.10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807
Clough, M., & Clark, R. (1994). Cookbooks and constructivism: A better approach to laboratory activities. The Science Teacher, 61(2), 34-37. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234586342
Cowie, B., & Bell, B. (1999). A model of formative assessment in science education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 6(1), 101-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695949993026
Fernandes, D. (2006). Para uma teoria da avaliação formativa. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 19(2), 21-50. http://hdl.handle.net/10451/5495
Fernandes, D. (2007). A avaliação das aprendizagens no sistema educativo português. Educação e Pesquisa, 33(3), 581-600. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-97022007000300013
Ferreira, S., & Morais, A. (2017). Exigência conceptual do trabalho prático: Abordagem multidisciplinar de análise do discurso pedagógico na aula de ciências. Práxis Educativa, 12(1), 25-47. https://doi.org/10.5212/PraxEduc.v.12i1.0002
Flick, U. (2012). Introducción a la investigación cualitativa. Ediciones Morata.
Galvão, C., Faria, C., Gonçalves, C., & Baptista, M. (Orgs.). (2016). Atividades investigativas e avaliação das aprendizagens: O contributo do projeto internacional SAILS. Instituto de Educação – Universidade de Lisboa.
Grob, R., Holmeier, M., & Labudde, P. (2017). Formative assessment to support students’ competences in Inquiry-Based Science Education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1673
Hayward, L. (2015). Assessment is learning: The preposition vanishes. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 22(1), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.984656
Heritage, M. (2018). Assessment for learning as support for student self-regulation. Australian Educational Researcher, 45, 51-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0261-3
Instituto de Educação da Universidade de Lisboa. (2016). Carta ética para a investigação em educação e formação do Instituto de Educação da Universidade de Lisboa (CEIEF). http://www.ie.ulisboa.pt/investigacao/comissao-de-etica
Leite, L. (2003). As actividades laboratoriais e a aprendizagem das ciências: Da observação quotidiana à explicação científica [Lição de síntese apresentada ao Instituto de Educação e Psicologia da Universidade do Minho, Braga].
Lessard-Hébert, M., Goyette, G., & Boutin, G. (2010). Investigação qualitativa. Instituto Piaget.
Ministério da Educação e Ciência. (2013). Metas curriculares do ensino básico – Ciências Naturais. https://www.dge.mec.pt/sites/default/files/ficheiros/eb_cn_metas_curriculares_5_6_7_8_ano_0.pdf
Morais, A. M., Neves, I. P., Ferreira, S., Afonso, M., & Silva, P. (2020). Conceptualização e coerência curricular em educação científica: Uma proposta de intervenção pedagógica. Investigações em Ensino das Ciências, 25(1), 99-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2020v25n1p99
Pinto, J., & Santos, L. (2006). Modelos de avaliação das aprendizagens. Universidade Aberta.
Santos, L. (2011). Que critérios de qualidade para a avaliação formativa? In D. Fernandes (Org.), Avaliação em educação: Olhares sobre uma prática social incontornável (pp. 155-165). Editora Melo. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314235559
Santos, L., & Pinto, J. (2018). Ensino de conteúdos escolares: A avaliação como fator estruturante. In F. Veiga (Coord.), O ensino como fator de envolvimento numa escola para todos (pp. 503-539). Climepsi Editores.
Stake, R. (1994). Case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 236-247). Sage Publications.
Tunstall, P., & Gipps, C. (1996). Teacher feedback to young children in formative assessment: A tipology. British Educational Research Journal, 22(4), 389-404. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192960220402
Wiliam, D. (2010). An integrative summary of the research literature and implications for a new theory of formative assessment. In H. Andrade & G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of Formative Assessment (pp. 18-40). Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Portuguese Journal of Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. The authors preserve their authorship and grant the Portuguese Journal of Education the right to the first publication. The work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License that allows sharing the work with the acknowledgment of initial authorship and publication in this Journal.
2. The authors have the right to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the published version of their work (e.g. to deposit in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), acknowledging the initial authorship and publication in this Journal.
3. The authors have the permission and are stimulated to post their work online (e.g. in an institutional repository or on their personal website). They can do this at any phase of the editorial process, as it may generate productive changes, as well as increase impact and article citation (see The Open Citation Project).
The work is licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)