Desenvolvimento profissional docente no Ensino Superior: Contributos para uma reflexão
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.21814/rpe.32680Mots-clés :
Desenvolvimento profissional, Pedagogia universitária, Formação pedagógica, Ensino a distância (EaD), Supervisão da investigaçãoRésumé
Dans le domaine de l'enseignement, les enseignants de l'enseignement supérieur sont censés se développer professionnellement, en approfondissant leurs connaissances dans le domaine de la pédagogie universitaire et en s'engageant dans des activités de réflexion et d'enquête sur la pédagogie dans le but d'innover et d'améliorer leur pratique pédagogique. Malgré l'importance du développement professionnel des enseignants pour l'amélioration de la qualité de l'enseignement et de l'apprentissage, il a évolué de différentes manières dans le contexte national et international et avec des impacts différents. Cette réalité est guidée par une culture organisationnelle fortement ancrée dans les politiques (trans)nationales qui guident et encouragent la professionnalisation des enseignants. Il existe des contextes dans lesquels le développement professionnel est fortement encouragé, valorisé et reconnu, et d'autres dans lesquels il n'est associé qu'à la recherche ou à des initiatives très individualisées ou non durables dans le domaine de la pédagogie.Cet article présente une analyse critique du développement professionnel des enseignants dans le contexte national et international, sur la base de la littérature et des études de recherche menées par l'auteur. Cette analyse critique repose sur l'hypothèse théorique selon laquelle le développement professionnel des enseignants, basé sur le domaine de la pédagogie et découlant de contextes d'apprentissage formels et/ou informels, développe des professionnels qui sont plus réfléchis et critiques vis-à-vis de leur rôle en tant qu'enseignants, superviseurs et/ou mentors, en leur donnant des compétences pédagogiques qui renforcent l'innovation et la qualité de l'enseignement.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
Références
Ali, W. (2020). Online and remote learning in higher education institutes: A necessity in light of COVID-19 pandemic. Higher Education Studies, 10(3), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v10n3p16
Almeida, L., Gonçalves, S., Ramos do Ó, J., Rebola, F., Soares, S., & Vieira, F. (2022). Inovação pedagógica no Ensino Superior: Cenários e caminhos de transformação. Agência de Avaliação e Acreditação do Ensino Superior. https://www.a3es.pt/sites/default/files/Inovacao_Pedagogica_no_Ensino_Superior_Cenarios_e_Caminhos_de_Transformacao.pdf
Almeida, M. M., Viana, J., & Alves, M. G. (2022). Exploring teaching conceptions and practices: A qualitative study with higher education teachers in Portugal. Studia Paedagogica, 27(2), 35-54. https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2022-2-2
Almeida, M. I., & Pimenta, S. G. (2014). Pedagogia universitária: Valorizando o ensino e a docência na universidade. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 27(2), 7-31. https://doi.org/10.21814/rpe.6243
Boyer, E. L. (1991). The scholarship of teaching from: Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. College Teaching, 39(1), 11–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.1991.10532213
Casanova, D., & Pessoa, T. (2020). Um modelo de design educacional para ambientes mistos e EaD. EmRede: Revista de Educação a Distância, 7(1), 4-20. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/10632
Decreto-Lei n.º 448/1979. (1979). Estatuto da Carreira Docente Universitária. Diário da República: Série I, pp. 2899 – 2917. https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/detalhe/decreto-lei/448-1979-367673
Decreto-Lei n.º 205/2009. (2009). Alteração do Estatuto da Carreira Docente Universitária. Diário da República, Série I, pp. 5729 – 5757. https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/detalhe/decreto-lei/205-2009-488485
Decreto-Lei n.º 133/2019. (2009). Regime jurídico do ensino superior ministrado a distância. Diário da República, Série I, pp. 49 – 57. https://diariodarepublica.pt/dr/detalhe/decreto-lei/133-2019-124392062
Deem, R. (2021). How are university teaching, students, and academics affected by policy clusters? A case study in England, UK – 2010-2020. In I. Huet, T. Pessoa & F. S. Murta (Eds.), Excellence in teaching and learning in Higher Education: Institutional policies, research, and practices in Europe (pp. 21-55). Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra. https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-2134-0
Emilsson, U. M., & Johnsson, E. (2007). Supervision of supervisors: on developing supervision in postgraduate education. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(2), 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701310797
Evans, C., Howson, C. K., Forsythe, A., & Edwards, C. (2021). What constitutes high quality higher education pedagogical research? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(4), 525-546. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1790500
Evans, L. (2018). Implicit and informal professional development: What it ‘looks like’, how it occurs, and why we need to research it. Professional Development in Education, 45(1), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1441172
Fanghanel, J., Pritchard, J., Potter, J., & Wisker, G. (2016). Defining and supporting the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL): A sector-wide study. Higher Education Academy. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/defining-and-supporting-scholarship-teaching-and-learning-sotl-sector-wide-study
Fernandes, S., Araújo, A. M., Miguel, I., & Abelha, M. (2023). Teacher professional development in Higher Education: The impact of pedagogical training perceived by teachers. Educational Sciences, 13(3), e309. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030309
Fossland, T. (2023). Becoming a professional supervisor: Doctoral supervisors’ development in a mandatory, large-scale development programme . Journal of Praxis in Higher Education, 5(2), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.47989/kpdc429
Freire, P. (2018). Pedagogia do oprimido. Edições Afrontamento.
Guskey, T. R. (2010). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
Halse, C., & Malfroy, J. (2010). Retheorizing doctoral supervision as professional work. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902906798
HEA UKPSF. (2020). UK Professional Standards Framework. Higher Education Academy. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/recognition-accreditation/uk-professional-standards-framework-ukpsf
Hornink, G. G., Vieira, F., & Costa, M. J. (2020). O papel do Centro IDEA-UMinho na transição para o ensino online durante a pandemia COVID-19: Enfrentar desafios e criar oportunidades. In M. Martins & E. Rodrigues (Coords.), A Universidade do Minho em tempos de pandemia: Tomo II: (Re)Ações (pp. 174-210). UMinho Editora. https://doi.org/10.21814/uminho.ed.24.8
Huet, I. (2012). Academic development as a strategy to enhance teaching quality in research intensive universities: The Portuguese context. Higher Education Network Journal, 5, 9-18. https://www.academia.edu/7589356/Kings_Learning_Institute_Higher_Education_Research_Network_Journal
Huet, I., & Casanova, D. (2021a). Exploring the professional development of supervisors through workplace learning: A literature review. Higher Education Research and Development, 41(3), 774-788. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1877629
Huet, I., & Casanova, D. (2021b). Exploring the professional development of online and distance doctoral supervisors. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(4), 430-440. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1742764
Huet, I., Casanova, D., & Garcia, F. (2022). The professional development of doctoral supervisors through an international lens. In M-L. Österlind, P. Denicolo & B-M. Apelgren (Eds.), Critical issues in transforming working conditions for doctoral students and their supporters (pp. 89-105). Gothenburg University Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004529304_007
International Association of Universities. (2020). Regional/National perspectives on the impact of COVID-19 on Higher Education. https://www.iau-aiu.net/IMG/pdf/iau_covid-19_regional_perspectives_on_the_impact_of_covid-19_on_he_july_2020_.pdf
Ives, G., & Rowley, G. (2005). Supervisor selection or allocation and continuity of supervision: Ph.D. students’ progress and outcomes. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500249161
Lee, A. (2018). How can we develop supervisors for the modern doctorate? Studies in Higher Education, 43(5), 878–890. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1438116
Marek, M. W., Chew, C. S., & Wu, W-C. V. (2021). Teacher experiences in converting classes to distance learning in the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 19(1), 89-109. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.20210101.oa3
Mezirow, J. (1981). A critical theory of adult learning and education. Adult Education, 32(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171368103200101
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Moreira, J. A., Henriques, S., & Barros, D. (2020). Transitando de um ensino remoto emergencial para uma educação digital em rede, em tempos de pandemia. Dialogia, (34), 351-364. https://doi.org/10.5585/Dialogia.N34.17123
Mula-Falcón, J., Caballero, K., & Segovia, J. D. (2021). Exploring academics’ identities in today’s universities: A systematic review. Quality Assurance in Education, 30(1), 118-134. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-09-2021-0152
Oliveira, G., Teixeira, J. G., Torres, A., & Morais, C. (2021). An exploratory study on the emergency remote education experience of Higher Education students and teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1357-1376. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13112
Pereira, A., Mendes, A. Q., Morgado, L., Amante, L., & Bidarra, J. (2007). Modelo pedagógico virtual da Universidade Aberta: Para uma universidade do futuro. Universidade Aberta. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.2/1295
Pleschová, G., Simon, E., Quinlan, K. M., Murphy, J., Roxa, T., & Szabó, M. (2012). The professionalisation of academics as teachers in Higher Education: Science position paper. European Science Foundation. http://archives.esf.org/fileadmin/Public_documents/Publications/professionalisation_academics.pdf
Price, L., Casanova, D., & Orwell, S. (2017). Modelling an institutional approach to developing technology enabled learning: Closing the gap between research and practice [Conference paper]. In INTED2017 Proceedings: 11th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (pp. 5009-5018). Valencia, Spain, 6-8 mar. 2017. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2017.1168
Raffing, R., Jensen, T. B., & Tønnesen, H. (2017). Self-reported needs for improving the supervision competence of PhD supervisors from the medical sciences in Denmark. BMC Medical Education, 17, e188, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1023-z
Rukundo, A. (2020). A comparative analysis of a pathway model and manuals to assess efficiency of pedagogical training in doctoral supervision in Uganda. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(1), 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1657033
Serhan, D. (2020). Transitioning from face-to-face to remote learning: Students’ attitudes and perceptions of using Zoom during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(4), 335-342. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.v4i4.148
Shulman, L. (2001). From Minsk to Pinsk: Why a scholarship of teaching and learning?. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 48-53. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/1582
Spowart, L., Winter, J., Turner, R., Burden, P., Botham, K. A., Muneer, R., van der Sluis, H., & Huet, I. (2019). ‘Left with a title but nothing else’: The challenges of embedding professional recognition schemes for teachers within higher education institutions. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(6), 1299-1312. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1616675
Taylor, S. (2018). Eligibility to supervise: A study of UK institutions. UK Council for Graduate Education. https://ukcge.ac.uk/resources/resource-library/eligibility-to-supervise-a-study-of-uk-institutions
Trigwell, K. (2013). Evidence of the impact of scholarship of teaching and learning purposes. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.2979/teachlearninqu.1.1.95
van der Rijst, R., Dean, B., & Laksov, K. B. (2022). Revisiting the impact of academic development: Scholarship and practice. International Journal for Academic Development, 27(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2022.2033425
van der Sluis, H., & Huet, I. (2021). Providing opportunities for professional learning: a sketch of professional development in the UK. In I. Huet, T. Pessoa, & F. S. Murta (Eds.), Excellence in teaching and learning in Higher Education: Institutional policies, research and practices in Europe (pp. 129-151). Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, Portugal. ISBN: 978-989-26-2134-0. https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-2134-0
Vieira, F. (2009). Em contra-corrente: O valor da indagação da pedagogia na universidade. Educação, Sociedade e Culturas, 28, 107-126. https://hdl.handle.net/1822/49267
Vieira, F. (2014). Para uma mudança profunda da qualidade da pedagogia na universidade. REDU: Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 12(2), 23-39. https://doi.org/10.4995/REDU.2014.5638
Vieira, F., Morgado, J. C., & Silva, N. (2016). Qualidade do ensino nas políticas institucionais: O caso da Universidade do Minho. In F. Vieira, J. L. Silva, M. A. Flores, C. C. Oliveira, F. I. Ferreira, S. Caires, & T. Sarmento (Orgs.), Inovação pedagógica no ensino superior. Ideias (e) práticas (Vol. 1, pp. 29-45). De Facto Editores.
Vieira, F., Silva, J. L., & Almeida, M. J. (2010). A pedagogia no ensino superior: Indagar para transformar. Pedagogia no Ensino Superior, 8, 21-43.
Waring, M., & Evans, C. (2014). Understanding pedagogy: Developing a critical approach to teaching and learning. Taylor and Francis.
Zabalza Beraza, M. A. (2007). La didáctica universitaria. Bordón: Revista de Pedagogía, 59(2-3), 489-509. http://hdl.handle.net/11162/36362
Téléchargements
Publiée
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Isabel Huet 2024

Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.
1. Autores conservam os direitos de autor e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 CC-BY-SA que permite a partilha do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista;
2. Autores e autoras têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: depositar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista;
3. Autores e autoras têm permissão e são estimulado/as a publicar e distribuir o seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal), já que isso pode aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons - Atribuição Compartilhamento pela mesma Licença Internacional 4.0