Stress in higher education teachers
a holistic perspective
Introduction The reality of portuguese higher education has been undergoing significant transformations, which have determined the increase of stress of its teachers. The performance of teaching functions in higher education is associated with various requirements, which in many cases causes occupational stress. Occupational stress reflects, from a transactional perspective, the imbalance that a person perceives between certain job demands and their ability to respond to them and incorporates, according to the holistic stress model, both positive (eustress) and negative (distress) responses to work stress agents, with positive and negative repercussions, respectively, on job satisfaction. Few studies have been developed on occupational stress, from a holistic perspective, and its relationship with job satisfaction of higher education teachers.
Objectives: With the purpose of deepening knowledge about the stress of higher education teachers, this study aims to evaluate the quality of the adjustment of the holistic stress model in Portuguese higher education teachers.
Methods: Data were collected from 439 higher education teachers in Portugal through a questionnaire designed for this purpose.
Results: The results point to a good fit quality of the proposed model (χ2(387)= 2117.683; p= 0.000; χ2/gl= 5.472; NFI= 0.89; PNFI= 0.79; CFI= 0.91; PCFI= 0.81; RMSEA= 0.10).
Conclusions: The results allowed us to draw a holistic model of stress and job satisfaction in higher education teachers, which presents a good adjustment and which, in view of the theoretical model initially proposed, presents some changes.
Bryant, F. B., & Veroff, J. (2007). Savoring: A New Model of Positive Experience. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Carver, C. (1997). You Want to measure coping but your protocol’s too long: consider the Brief Cope. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4(1), 92-100.
Chaudhry, A. (2012). The relationship betwenn occupational stress and job satisfaction: The case of Pakistani Universities. International Education Studies, 5(3), 212-221.
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385–396.
Cooper, C., & Cartwright, S. (1994). Healthy mind, healthy organization: A proactive approach to occupational stress. Human Relations, 41, 455-471.
Fonseca, S. (2014). Modelo de stresse e satisfação no trabalho: Estudo com professores do ensino superior português (Tese de doutoramento). Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação da Universidade do Porto, Porto.
Fonseca, S., & Jordão, F. (2014). Adaptação e validação da Eustress Scale para professores portugueses. Psychologica, 57(1), 93-112.
Gillespie, N., Walsh, M., Winefield, A., Dua, J., & Stough, C. (2001). Occupational stress in universities: staff perceptions of the causes, consequences and moderators of stress. Work & stress, 15(1), 53-72.
Gomes, A., Silva, M., Mourisco, S., Silva, S., Mota, A., & Montenegro, N. (2006). Problemas e desafios no exercício da actividade docente: Um estudo sobre o stress, “burnout”, saúde física e satisfação profissional em professores do 3º ciclo e ensino secundário. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 19(1), 67-93.
Jordão, F., & Aragão, A. (2013). Development and psychometric study to the Scale of Organizational Sources of Stress on Teaching in Higher Education. Psychologica, 56, 67-81.
Kinman, G., Jones, F., & Kinman, R. (2006). The well-being of the UK academy, 19982004. Quality in Higher Education, 12 (1), 15-27.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1987). Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. European Journal of Personality, 1, 141-170.
Marôco, J. (2010). Análise de equações estruturais. Fundamentos teóricos, software & aplicações. Pêro Pinheiro: ReportNumber, Lda.
Menezes Santos, V., Carvalho, J., & Marques Pinto, A. (2008). Estudo de adaptação do Ways of Savoring Checklist (WOSC). Lisboa: FPUL (documento policopiado).
Mota-Cardoso, R., Araújo, A., Ramos, R., Gonçalves, G., & Ramos, M. (2002). O stress nos professores portugueses. Estudo IPSSO 2000. Porto: Porto Editora.
Nelson, D. L., & Simmons, B. L. (2011). Savoring eustress while coping with distress: The holistic model of stress. In J. C. Quick & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health psychology (pp. 55-74). Washington: American Psychological Association.
O´Sullivan, G. (2011). The relationship between hope, eustress, self-efficacy, and life satisfaction among undergraduates. Social Indicators Research, 101(1), 155-172.
Pais-Ribeiro, J., & Rodrigues, C. (2004). Questões acerca do coping: A propósito do estudo de adaptação do Brief Cope. Psicologia, Saúde & Doenças, 5(1), 3-15.
Quick, J., & Henderson, D. (2016). Occupational Stress: Preventing Suffering, Enhancing Wellbeing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(5), 459-469.
Sampieri, R., Collado, C., & Lucio, P. (2006). Metodologia de pesquisa (3ª Ed.). São Paulo: McGraw-Hill.
Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 5-14.
Simmons, B. & Nelson, D. (2007). Eustress at work: Extending the Holistic Stress Model. In D. Nelson & C. Cooper (Eds.), Positive Organizational Behavior (pp. 40-53). London: Sage Publications.
Travers, C., & Cooper, C. (1996). Teachers under pressure. Stress in the teaching profission. London: Routledge.
Williams, S. & Cooper, C. (1996). Pressure Management Indicator. Harrogate: RDA.
Winefield, A., Gillespie, N.; Stough, C., Dua, J., Hapuarachchi, J., & Boyd, C. (2003). Occupational stress in Australian university staff: Results from a national survey. International Journal of Stress Management, 10(1), 51-63.
Copyright (c) 2020 Millenium - Journal of Education, Technologies, and Health
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit proposals for this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Articles are published under the License Creative Commons, in full open-access, without any cost or fees of any kind to the author or the reader;
b) The authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, allowing the free sharing of work, provided it is correctly attributed the authorship and initial publication in this journal;
c) The authors are permitted to take on additional contracts separately for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, post it to an institutional repository or as a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal;
d) Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg, in institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and citation of published work
Documents required for submission