Clinical supervision of the nurse in the community to promote quality of care provided by the caregiver

scoping review protocol

Authors

  • Márcia Coelho Nursing School of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Baixo Vouga Hospital Centre, Aveiro, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4885-2064
  • Inês Esteves University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8867-7424
  • Mauro Mota Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E), Coimbra, Portugal; Viseu Higher School of Health, Viseu, Portugal; Local Health Unit of Guarda, Guarda, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8188-6533
  • Márcia Pestana-Santos Portugal Centre for Evidence-Based Practice: a JBI Centre of Excellence, Coimbra; Portugal; Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E); Nursing School of Coimbra (ESEnfC), Coimbra, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4093-0291
  • Margarida Reis Santos Nursing School of Porto, Porto, Portugal; CINTESIS - Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Porto, Portugal; University of Porto - Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, Porto, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7948-9317
  • Regina Pires Nursing School of Porto, Porto, Portugal; CINTESIS - Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Porto, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1610-7091

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0218.26656

Keywords:

nursing, supervisory, nurses, quality improvement, caregivers, community networks

Abstract

Introduction: Caregivers do not usually have the knowledge and skills to provide care. Nurses have a decisive role in the quality of care and people's health outcomes. Clinical supervision of nurses is a strategic and formal process that requires a cohesive supervisory relationship.

Objective: To map the supervisory strategies used by nurses in the community to promote the quality of care provided by caregivers. Methods: This review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for scoping reviews and will include studies about nurses who have implemented clinical supervision strategies to promote the quality of care provided by caregivers in the community. Published and unpublished studies written in english, portuguese or spanish since 1993 will be considered. Study selection will be carried out by two independent reviewers, using a third reviewer in case of disagreement. The search results, study selection and inclusion process will be presented in a PRISMA flowchart for Scoping Reviews. Data extraction, analysis of evidence and results about the extent and type of evidence will be presented in a tabular form.

Results: The previous bibliographic research allowed the identification of some supervisory strategies implemented by nurses to promote the quality of care provided by the caregiver.

Conclusion: This review will contribute to identify supervisory strategies used by nurses to promote the quality of care provided by caregivers.

References

Cutcliffe, J. R., Sloan, G., & Bashaw, M. (2018). A systematic review of clinical supervision evaluation studies in nursing.

International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 27(5), 1344-1363. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12443

Dahlke, S., O’Connor, M., Hannesson, T., & Cheetham, K. (2016). Understanding clinical nursing education: An exploratory study.

Nursing Education in Practice, 17, 145-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2015.12.004

Department of Health. (1993). A vision for the future: The nursing, midwifery and health visiting contribution to health and health care. NHS Management Executive: Stationery Office.

European Comission. (2018). Informal care in Europe: Exploring formalisation, availability and quality. Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/pt/publication-detail/-/publication/96d27995-6dee-11e8-9483-01aa75ed71a1

Family Caregiver Alliance. (2014). Definitions: What do we mean by… https://www.caregiver.org/resource/definitions-0/

Glendinning, C., Arksey, H., Tjadens, F., Morée, M., Moran, N., & Nies, H. (2009). Care provision within families and its socio- economic impact on care providers across the European Union. Social Policy Research Unit – University of York, 05, 1-4. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265105593_Care_Provision_within_Families_and_its_Socio- Economic_Impact_on_Care_Providers

International Council of Nurses. (2020). Nurses: A voice to lead – Nursing the world to health. Author. https://2020.icnvoicetolead.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/IND_Toolkit_120320.pdf

International Council of Nurses. (2021). Nurses: A voice to lead – A vision for future healthcare. Author. https://www.icn.ch/system/files/documents/2021-05/ICN%20Toolkit_2021_ENG_Final.pdf

International Council of Nurses. (2021). The ICN code of ethics for nurses – Revised 2021. Author. https://www.icn.ch/system/files/2021-10/ICN_Code-of-Ethics_EN_Web_0.pdf

Kin, C., Tsang, C. Y. J., Zhang, L. W., & Chan, S. K. Y. (2021). A nurse-led education program for pneumoconiosis caregivers at the community level. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3), 1092. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031092

Lynch, L., Happell, B., & Sharrock, J. (2008). Clinical supervision: An exploration of its origins and definitions. International Journal of Psychiatric Nursing Research, 13(2). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235918553

Markey, K., Murphy, L., O’Donnell, C., Turner, J., & Doody, O. (2020). Clinical supervision: A panacea for missed care. Journal of Nursing Management, 28(8), 2113-2117. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13001

Mazanec, S. R., Sandstrom, K., Coletta, D., Dorth, J., Zender, C., Alfes, C. M., & Daly, B. J. (2019). Building family caregiver skills using a simulation-based intervention: A randomized pilot trial. Oncology Nursing Forum, 46(4), 419-427. https://doi.org/10.1188/19.ONF.419-427

McGowan, J., Straus, S., Moher, D., Langlois, E. V., O'Brien, K. K., Horsley, T., Aldcroft, A., Zarin, W., Garitty, C. M., Hempel, S., Lillie, E., Tunçalp, Ö., & Tricco, A. C. (2020). Reporting scoping reviews-PRISMA ScR extension. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 123, 177-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.016

Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1

O’Shea, J., Kavanagh, C., Roche, L., Roberts, L., & Connaire, S. (2019). Clinical supervision for nurses working in mental health services: A guide for nurse managers, supervisors and supervisees. Office of the Nursing and Midwifery Services Director, Health Service Executive. https://www.lenus.ie/bitstream/handle/10147/626949/clinical%20supervision%20for%20nurses%20working%20in%20 mental%20health%20services%20a%20guide%20%20final.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z., & Elmagarmid, A. (2016). Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.

Systematic Reviews, 5(210), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4

Peters, M. D. J., Marnie, C., Tricco, A. C., Pollock, D., Munn, Z., Alexander, L., McInerney, P., Godfrey, C. M., & Khalil, H. (2020). Update methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18(10), 2119-2126. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167

Pollock, A., Campbell, P., Deery, R., Fleming, M., Rankin, J., Sloan, G., & Cheyne, H. (2017). A systematic review of evidence relating to clinical supervision for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 73(8), 1825- 1837. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13253

Proctor, B. (1991). Supervision: A Co-Operative Exercise in Accountability. In M. Marken, & M. Payn (Eds.), Enabling and Ensuring: Supervision in Practice (pp. 21-23). National Bureau and Council for Education and Training in Youth and Community Work.

Rico-Blázquez, M., García-Sanz, P., Martín-Martín, M., López-Rodríguez, J. A., Morey-Montalvo, M., Sanz-Cuesta, T., Rivera-Álvarez, A., Araujo-Calvo, M., Frías-Redondo, S., Escortell-Mayor, E., & Cura-González, I. D. (2021). Effectiveness of a home-based Nursing support and cognitive restructuring intervention on the quality of life of family caregivers in primary care: A pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 120(103955). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103955

Teixeira, M. J. C., Abreu, W. J. C., & Costa, N. M. V. N. (2016). Family caregivers of terminally ill patients at home: Contributions for a supervision model. Revista de Enfermagem Referência, 4(8), 65-73. https://doi.org/10.12707/RIV15054

Torres, M. E., Capistrant, B. D., & Karpman, H. (2020). The effect of medicaid expansion on caregiver’s quality of life. Social Work in Public Health, 35(6), 473-482. https://doi.org/10.1080/19371918.2020.1798836

Vieira, J., Santos, M. R., Pires, R., & Pereira, F. (2021). Quality indicators of professional practice of nurses: The caregiver role. Millenium_ Jounal of Education, Technologies, and Health, 2(16), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0216.24785 World Health Organization. (2021). Global strategic diretions for nursing and midwifery 2021-2025. Author.

https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/344562/9789240033863-eng.pdf

Downloads

Published

2022-05-31

How to Cite

Coelho, M., Esteves, I., Mota, M., Pestana-Santos, M., Reis Santos, M., & Pires, R. (2022). Clinical supervision of the nurse in the community to promote quality of care provided by the caregiver: scoping review protocol. Millenium - Journal of Education, Technologies, and Health, 2(18), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0218.26656

Issue

Section

Life and Healthcare Sciences