Exploring student satisfaction and perceived employability: a quest for the quality of polytechnics as perceived by students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0228.42828Keywords:
student satisfaction; perceived employability; perceived quality; polytechnicsAbstract
Introduction: Student satisfaction and perceived employability are critical constructs in assessing perceived quality of higher education institutions, and thus exploring them has been the focus of extensive research.
Objective: Explore student satisfaction and perceived employability in Indonesian higher vocational education, namely polytechnics.
Methods: Convergent-parallel mixed methods approach. The data was collected from 356 final-year students enrolled in four-year diploma programs across four state polytechnics in East Java, Indonesia. In the quantitative strand, closed-ended responses were analyzed descriptively using tertile analysis and inferentially through Kruskal–Wallis, Mann–Whitney U, and Spearman’s correlation tests.
Results: Student satisfaction and perceived employability levels are consistent across demographic groups, with a significant positive correlation found between these two constructs. Three overarching factors contributing to student satisfaction are academics, non-academics, and employability. Two overarching factors contributing to perceived employability are internal employability and external employability. The academic factor, particularly curriculum design and faculty competence, emerges as the main determinant of student satisfaction. The internal employability factor—understood as what is offered to employers—appears more influential in shaping perceived employability than the external employability factor—understood as what employers expect.
Conclusion: The study offers theoretical contributions and practical recommendations to improve the perceived quality of polytechnics, aligning educational outcomes with the expectations of students, parents, and industry stakeholders.
Downloads
References
Álvarez-González, P., López-Miguens, M. J., & Caballero, G. (2017). Perceived employability in university students: developing an integrated model. Career Development International, 22(3), 280–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-08-2016-0135
Brown, R. M., & Mazzarol, T. W. (2009). The importance of institutional image to student satisfaction and loyalty within higher education. Higher Education, 58(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9183-8
de Oliveira Silva, J. H., de Sousa Mendes, G. H., Ganga, G. M. D., Mergulhão, R. C., & Lizarelli, F. L. (2020). Antecedents and consequents of student satisfaction in higher technical-vocational education: evidence from Brazil. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 20(2), 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-019-09407-1
Donald, W. E., Baruch, Y., & Ashleigh, M. J. (2024). Construction and operationalisation of an Employability Capital Growth Model (ECGM) via a systematic literature review (2016–2022). Studies in Higher Education, 49(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2219270
Edmonds, W. A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2017). Convergent-parallel approach. In An applied guide to research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (pp. 181–188). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071802779.n15
Feng, X., & Behar-Horenstein, L. (2019). Maximizing NVivo utilities to analyze open-ended responses. The Qualitative Report, 24(3), 563-571. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3692
Fugate, M., Kinicki, A. J., & Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Employability: A psycho-social construct, its dimensions, and applications. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 14–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.10.005
Gary S. B. (1993). Human Capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press. https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c3730/c3730.pdf
Gedye, S., & Beaumont, E. (2018). “The ability to get a job”: student understandings and definitions of employability. Education + Training, 60(5), 406–420. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-10-2017-0159
Groccia, J. E. (1997). The student as customer versus the student as learner. About Campus, 2(2), 31–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/108648229700200209
Gupta, P., & Kaushik, N. (2018). Dimensions of service quality in higher education – critical review (students’ perspective). International Journal of Educational Management, 32(4), 580–605. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2017-0056
Handini, D., Hidayat, F., Putri, D. A. V., Rauf, M. R., Anjani, B. R., & Attamimi, A. N. R. (2020). Higher education statistical year book 2020. Secretariat Directorate General of Higher Education. https://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/22653/
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Indrawati, S. M., & Kuncoro, A. (2021). Improving competitiveness through vocational and higher education: Indonesia’s vision for human capital development in 2019–2024. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 57(1), 29–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2021.1909692
Kriesi, I., & Sander, F. (2024). Academic or vocational education? A comparison of the long-term wage development of academic and vocational tertiary degree holders. Journal for Labour Market Research, 58(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12651-024-00368-9
Leiva, F. M., Ríos, F. J. M., & Martínez, T. L. (2006). Assessment of interjudge reliability in the open-ended questions coding process. Quality and Quantity, 40(4), 519–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-1093-6
Lenton, P. (2015). Determining student satisfaction: An economic analysis of the National Student Survey. Economics of Education Review, 47, 118–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.05.001
Lim, M. A., Anabo, I. F., Phan, A. N. Q., Elepaño, M. A., & Kuntamarat, G. (2023). State of higher education in Southeast Asia. Share ProJect Management Office: ASEAN Secretariat. https://encurtador.com.br/Aiwuj
Ma, Y., & Chen, S.-C. (2024). Understanding the determinants and consequences of perceived employability in graduate labor market in China. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 24(2), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-022-09567-7
Mark, E. (2013). Student satisfaction and the customer focus in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 35(1), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2012.727703
Marzi, G., Balzano, M., & Marchiori, D. (2024). K-Alpha Calculator–Krippendorff’s Alpha Calculator: A user-friendly tool for computing Krippendorff’s Alpha inter-rater reliability coefficient. MethodsX, 12, 102545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2023.102545
Moseholm, E., & Fetters, M. D. (2017). Conceptual models to guide integration during analysis in convergent mixed methods studies. Methodological Innovations, 10(2), 2059799117703118. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799117703118
OECD/Asian Development Bank. (2015). Education in Indonesia: Rising to the Challenge. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264230750-en
Prakash, G. (2018). Quality in higher education institutions: insights from the literature. TQM Journal, 30(6), 732–748. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-04-2017-0043
Rothwell, A., Herbert, I., & Rothwell, F. (2008). Self-perceived employability: Construction and initial validation of a scale for university students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.12.001
Sánchez-Queija, M. I., Sánchez-García, L., Rothwell, A. T., & Parra, Á. (2023). Differences in self-perceived employability between university and VET students: an analysis of emerging adults in Spain. Education + Training, 65(10), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-09-2022-0366
Santini, F. de O., Ladeira, W. J., Sampaio, C. H., & da Silva Costa, G. (2017). Student satisfaction in higher education: a meta-analytic study. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 27(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2017.1311980
Smith, C., & Worsfold, K. (2014). WIL curriculum design and student learning: a structural model of their effects on student satisfaction. Studies in Higher Education, 39(6), 1070–1084. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.777407
Tabor R., S. (2015). Constraints to Indonesia’s economic growth (ADB Papers on Indonesia). Asian Development Bank : Paper and Brief. https://scispace.com/pdf/constraints-to-indonesia-s-economic-growth-14j54yqg7d.pdf
Tuor, S. N., & Backes‐Gellner, U. (2010). Risk‐return trade‐offs to different educational paths: vocational, academic and mixed. International Journal of Manpower, 31(5), 495–519. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437721011066335
Vanhercke, D., De Cuyper, N., Peeters, E., & De Witte, H. (2014). Defining perceived employability: a psychological approach. Personnel Review, 43(4), 592–605. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-07-2012-0110
Webb, S., Bathmaker, A.-M., Gale, T., Hodge, S., Parker, S., & Rawolle, S. (2017). Higher vocational education and social mobility: educational participation in Australia and England. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 69(1), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2016.1269359
Yang, P., & Lin, X. Y. (2014). Employability as a new mission? Chinese Education & Society, 47(5), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.2753/CED1061-1932470501.2014.11083012
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Millenium - Journal of Education, Technologies, and Health
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit proposals for this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Articles are published under the Licença Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0), in full open-access, without any cost or fees of any kind to the author or the reader;
b) The authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, allowing the free sharing of work, provided it is correctly attributed the authorship and initial publication in this journal;
c) The authors are permitted to take on additional contracts separately for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, post it to an institutional repository or as a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal;
d) Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg, in institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and citation of published work
Documents required for submission
Article template (Editable format)
