El Tiempo de los Actantes

Instrumentos de Política y “Máquinas de Gobernar” en la Multirregulación de la Educación

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25749/sis.45674

Palabras clave:

multirregulación, instrumentos de acción pública, gobernanza digital, política educativa

Resumen

Ante la intensificación de la datificación de la gobernanza de la educación, impulsada por la digitalización y por la emergencia de nuevas aplicaciones de la inteligencia artificial, el artículo propone y discute la posibilidad y el interés de un giro hacia la sociomaterialidad como aporte a la renovación de la investigación sobre las políticas educativas desarrollada desde la perspectiva de la multirregulación de la educación. Recurriendo a la noción de actante, el artículo sitúa en el centro del análisis dos tipos de elementos materiales y técnicos – los instrumentos de las políticas públicas y las “máquinas de gobernar” digitales de naturaleza cibernética –, considerándolos como componentes que, de modo más o menos discreto y en interrelación con actores y discursos, también organizan y condicionan los procesos de gobernanza de la educación.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Luís Miguel Carvalho, UIDEF, Instituto de Educação, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal

Professor catedrático no Instituto de Educação da Universidade de Lisboa e investigador integrado da UIDEF [Unidade de Investigação e Desenvolvimento em Educação e Formação]. A sua investigação centra-se nos instrumentos e nas dinâmicas de governação dos sistemas educativos.

Citas

Barroso, J. (2005). O Estado, a educação e a regulação das políticas públicas. Educação & Sociedade, 26(92), 725-751. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-73302005000300002

Barroso, J. (2018). A transversalidade das regulações em educação: Modelo de análise para o estudo das políticas educativas em Portugal. Educação & Sociedade, 39(145), 1075-1097. https://doi.org/10.1590/ES0101-73302018214219

Breton, P. (2005). La “société de la connaissance”: généalogie d’une double réduction. Éducation et Sociétés, 15(I), 45-57.

Brøgger, K., & Madsen, M. (2022). An affirmative-diffractive re-reading of the policy instrumentation approach through agential realism and the accreditation instrument. Journal of Education Policy, 37(6), 925-943. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2021.1938239

Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, Action and Belief. A new Sociology of Knowledge? (pp. 196-229). Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Callon, M., Lhomme, R., & Fleury, J. (1999). Pour une sociologie de la traduction en innovation [Entretien avec Michel Callon]. Recherche & Formation, 31, 113-126.

Camphuijsen, M. K., Møller, J., & Skedsmo, G. (2021). Test-based accountability in the Norwegian context: exploring drivers, expectations and strategies. Journal of Education Policy, 36(5), 624-642. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1739337

Carvalho, L. M. (2015). As políticas públicas de educação sob o prisma da ação pública: esboço de uma perspetiva de análise e inventário de estudos. Currículo sem Fronteiras, 15(2), 314-333. http://www.curriculosemfronteiras.org/vol15iss2articles/carvalho.htm

Carvalho, L. M. (2020). Revisiting the fabrications of PISA. In G. Fan & T. S. Popkewitz (Eds.), Handbook of education policy studies (Vol. 2, pp. 259-273). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8343-4_14

Carvalho, L. M., & Alves, N. (2023). Regulação, autonomia e accountability em educação. In Aa. Vv., Sínteses de Investigação UIDEF: 2020-2023 (pp. 92-122). IE-ULisboa.

Carvalho, L. M., Costa, E., & Almeida, M. (2021). Recontextualization of improvement-oriented policies in Portugal: The case of the pilot project for pedagogical innovation (2016-2019). International Journal of Educational Research, 110, 101865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101865

Carvalho, L. M., Costa, E., & Sant’Ovaia, C. (2025). Political-administrative elites at work: the making of a major educational programme (Portugal, 2017–2022). In R. Normand, L. Moos & L. M. Carvalho (Eds.), National and transnational elite influences on education (pp. 173-194). Springer.

Carvalho, L. M., & Gonçalves, C. (2025). Investigando as políticas públicas de educação sob o prisma dos instrumentos: panorama da literatura (2009-2023). Currículo sem Fronteiras, 25, e1161. http://curriculosemfronteiras.org/vol25articles/carvalho-goncalves.pdf

Carvalho, L. M., & Viseu, S. (2024). New philanthropy in education in Portugal: fabricating social inclusion as policy, knowledge and practice. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 45(1), 146-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2023.2273957

Charlot, B. (2006). A pesquisa educacional entre conhecimentos, políticas e práticas: especificidades e desafios de uma área de saber. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 11(31), 7-18. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-24782006000100002

Costa, E., & Carvalho, L. M. (2023). Framing school governance and teacher professional development using global standardized school assessments. Education Sciences, 13(9), 873. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090873

Cruz, J. M., Costa, A. S., & Magalhães, A. (2025). Os novos atores na governação digital da educação: Instrumentos, estratégias e discursos. Educação, Sociedade & Culturas, 72. https://doi.org/10.24840/esc.vi72.1871

Decuypere, M., & Simons, M. (2016a). On the critical potential of sociomaterial approaches in education. Teoría de la Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria, 28(1), 25-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.14201/teoredu20162812544

Decuypere, M., & Simons, M. (2016b). Relational thinking in education: topology, sociomaterial studies, and figures. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 24(3), 371-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2016.1166150

Dubarle, D. (1948, 28 de dezembro). Pour une nouvelle machine à gouverner – une nouvelle science: la cybernétique. Le Monde. https://www.lemonde.fr/article-offert/a54a61c9e905-3036529

Eeva, K. (2021). Governing through consensus? The European Semester, soft power and education governance in the EU. European Educational Research Journal, 23(2), 178-197. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041211055601

Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-network theory in education. Routledge.

Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: tracing the socio-material. Routledge.

Fenwick, T., & Landri, P. (2012). Materialities, textures and pedagogies: socio-material assemblages in education. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 20(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.649421

Gonçalves, C. (2022). A regulação digital da educação sob o prisma dos instrumentos: dinâmicas de conceção e apropriação do Escola 360. (Tese de doutoramento). Instituto de Educação da Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Grek, S. (2012). What PISA knows and can do: studying the role of national actors in the making of PISA. European Educational Research Journal, 11(2), 243-254. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2012.11.2.243

Gulson, K.N., Sellar, S., & Taylor-Webb, P. (2023). Algorithms of Education. How datafication and artificial intelligence shape policy. University of Minnesota Press.

Halpern, C., Lascoumes, P., & Le Galès, P. (2014). L'instrumentation de l’action publique. Presses de Sciences Po.

Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2011). Code/space: software and everyday life. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262042482.001.0001

Landri, P. (2018). Digital Governance of Education: Technology, standards and europeanization of education. Bloomsbury Academic.

Landri, P. (2020). Educational leadership, management, and administration through Actor-Network Theory. Routledge.

Lascoumes, P., & Le Galès, P. (2007a). Sociologie de l'action publique. Armand Colin.

Lascoumes, P., & Le Galès, P. (2007b). Introduction: Understanding Public Policy through its Instruments—From the Nature of Instruments to the Sociology of Public Policy Instrumentation. Governance, 20(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00342.x

Latour, B. (1995/1987). La science en action. Gallimard.

Latour, B. (1996/1990). On actor-network theory. A few clarifications. Soziale Welt, 47, 369-381.

Mangez, E., & Cattonar, B. (2009). The status of PISA in the relationship between civil society and the educational sector in French-speaking Belgium. Sísifo. Educational Sciences Journal, 10, 15-26. https://arquivo.pt/wayback/20100602130423/http://sisifo.fpce.ul.pt/?r=26&p=15

Nichols, T. P., & Dixon-Román, E. (2024). Platform governance and education policy: power and politics in emerging Edtech ecologies. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 46(2), 309-328. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737231202469

Nichols, T. P., & Garcia, A. (2022). Platform studies in education. Harvard Educational Review, 92(2), 209-230. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-92.2.209

Ozga, J. (2021). Problematising policy: the development of (critical) policy sociology. Critical Studies in Education, 62(3), 290-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2019.1697718

Piattoeva, N., & Vasileva, N. (2023). Taming the time zone: National large-scale assessments as instruments of time in the Russian Federation. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 31. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.31.7323

Ramiel, H., & Dishon, G. (2021). Future uncertainty and the production of anticipatory policy knowledge: the case of the Israeli future-oriented pedagogy project. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 44(1), 30-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2021.1953444

Shahzad, R., & Gorur, R. (2024). Actor-Network Theory: a material-semiotic approach to policy analysis. In M. Stacey & N. Mockler (Eds.), Analysing education policy: theory and method (pp. 157-170). Routledge.

Simons, M. (2014). Governing through feedback: from national orientation towards global positioning. In T. Fenwick, E. Mangez & J. Ozga (Eds.), World Yearbook of Education 2014. Governing knowledge: comparison, knowledge-based technologies and expertise in the regulation of Education (pp. 155-171). Routledge.

Triclot, M. (2016). La machine à gouverner. Une dystopie à la naissance de l’informatique. In R. Belot & L. Heyberger (Eds.), Prométhée et son double (pp. 197-212). Alphil.

Verger, A., Fontdevila, C., & Parcerisa, L. (2019). Reforming governance through policy instruments: how and to what extent standards, tests and accountability in education spread worldwide. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 40(2), 248-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2019.1569882

Viseu, S. (2022). New philanthropy and policy networks in global education governance: the case of OECD’s netFWD. International Journal of Educational Research, 114, 102001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102001

Viseu, S., Martins, E., & Carvalho, L. M. (2025). Education governance, philanthropy and knowledge brokering: The case of a digital education programme by a private foundation in Portugal. International Journal of Educational Development, 114, 103262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103262

Williamson, B. (2016). Digital education governance: An introduction. European Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904115616630

Williamson, B. (2017). Learning machines, digital data and the future of education. In Big Data in Education: The digital future of learning, policy and practice (pp. 2-23). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529714920.n1

Publicado

2026-06-30