Construção de um Instrumento para Avaliar Perceções sobre Inteligência Artificial entre Docentes Universitários
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25749/sis.45093Palavras-chave:
ensino superior, competência digital, inteligência artificial, validação, análise fatorialResumo
O estudo tem como objetivos conceber e validar um instrumento para avaliar as perceções e utilizações da Inteligência Artificial em professores de uma universidade privada de Lima (Peru), bem como analisar os resultados obtidos. A investigação foi desenvolvida em duas etapas: uma instrumental, orientada para avaliar a validade e confiabilidade do questionário, e outra descritiva, destinada à análise dos resultados. Foi utilizada uma amostragem não probabilística por conveniência, com a participação de 385 professores universitários de seis áreas académicas. Os resultados evidenciam que o instrumento utilizado atinge níveis adequados de validade e confiabilidade para a medição do construto proposto. A IA é percebida positivamente pelos professores; no entanto, a sua integração na prática docente é moderada. Eles destacam a necessidade de uma atitude crítica em relação aos conteúdos gerados pela IA, devido a possíveis enviesamentos e imprecisões, enfatizando um uso reflexivo e responsável no âmbito educativo.
Downloads
Referências
Akram, H., Abdelrady, A., Al-Adwan, A., & Ramzan, M. (2022). Teachers’ Perceptions of Technology Integration in Teaching-Learning Practices: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(920317), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920317
Arslan, N., Youssef, M. H., & Ghandour, R. (2025). AI and learning experiences of international students studying in the UK : an exploratory case study. Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1108/AIIE-10-2024-0019
Ato, M., López-García, J. J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en Psicología [A classification system of research designs in Psychology]. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 1038-1059. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511
Balbo Di Vinadio, T., van Noordt, C., Vargas Alvarez del Castillo, C., & Avila, R. (2022). Inteligencia artificial y transformación digital: Competencias para funcionarios públicos. Informe del Grupo de Trabajo sobre creación de capacidades de IA. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000383325_spa
Beck, E., Goin, M. E., Ho, A., Parks, A., & Rowe, S. (2021). Critical digital literacy as method for teaching tactics of response to online surveillance and privacy erosion. Computers and Composition, 61, 102654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2021.102654
Cosgrove, J., & Cachia, R. (2025). DigComp 3.0: European Digital Competence Framework (Fifth Edition). Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/7379058
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868
Digital Education Council. (2025a). AI Use in Higher Education LATAM survey [Unpublished questionnaire].
Digital Education Council. (2025b). Digital Education Council Global AI Faculty Survey 2025. https://www.digitaleducationcouncil.com/post/digital-education-council-global-ai-faculty-survey
Digital Education Council. (2026). Digital Education Council: A global community of practice for education innovation. https://www.digitaleducationcouncil.com/
Elliott, J. C., & Tunks, C. S. (2021). Modern Teacher Education - Supporting the Vast Landscape of 21st Century Pedagogy. In M. J. Hernández-Serrano (Ed.), Teacher Education in the 21st Century - Emerging Skills for a Changing World. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.97032
Erstad, O., Kjällander, S., & Järvelä, S. (2021). Facing the challenges of ‘digital competence:’ a Nordic agenda for curriculum development for the 21st century. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 16(2), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2021-02-04
Esteve-Mon, F. M., Llopis-Nebot, M. A., & Adell-Segura, J. (2020). Digital Teaching Competence of University Teachers: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 15(4), 399-406. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2020.3033225
Etikan, I. (2017). Sampling and Sampling Methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 215-217. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149
Farias-Gaytan, S., Aguaded, I., & Ramirez-Montoya, M. S. (2023). Digital transformation and digital literacy in the context of complexity within higher education institutions: a systematic literature review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 386. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01875-9
Gallardo-Echenique, E., Bossio, J., Tomás-Rojas, A., & Freundt-Thurne, Ú. (2023). Evidencias de validez y confiabilidad del DigCompEdu CheckIn en docentes de una universidad privada peruana. Revista Publicaciones, 53(2), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.30827/publicaciones.v53i2.26817
Gallardo-Echenique, E., Poma-Acevedo, A., & Esteve Mon, F. M. (2018). La competencia digital: análisis de una experiencia en el contexto universitario. Revista de Ciencias de La Educación. ACADEMICUS, I(12), 6-15. http://www.ice.uabjo.mx/media/15/2019/03/1A2019.pdf
Gliner, J. A., & Morgan, G. A. (2001). Measurement reliability. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(4), 486-488. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200104000-00019
Grady, C., Cummings, S. R., Rowbotham, M. C., Mcconnell, M. V, Ashley, E. A., & Kang, G. (2017). Informed Consent. The New England Journal of Medicine, 376(9), 856-867. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1603773
Guanche, J. C., Reyes, N., & Guoliang, L. (2025). Inteligencia artificial (IA) y competencias mediáticas, digitales, informacionales y comunicacionales en América Latina y el Caribe: una perspectiva ética y crítica en la era algorítmica. Chasqui. Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicación, 159, 13-32. https://doi.org/10.16921/chasqui.v1i159.5219
Huang, W., & Yu, W. (2025). Barriers to integrating artificial intelligence education: implications from five early adopters in South Korea. Computer Science Education, 00(00), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2025.2565199
Ilomäki, L., Lakkala, M., Kallunki, V., Mundy, D., Romero, M., Romeu, T., & Gouseti, A. (2023). Critical digital literacies at school level: A systematic review. Review of Education, 11(3), e3425. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3425
Kline, P. (2014[1993]). An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315788135
Kline, R. (2016). Principles and practices of structural equation modelling. (4th Edition). The Guilford Press.
Kong, S. C., Korte, S. M., Burton, S., Keskitalo, P., Turunen, T., Smith, D., Wang, L., Lee, J. C. K., & Beaton, M. C. (2025). Artificial Intelligence (AI) literacy–an argument for AI literacy in education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 62(2), 477-483. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2024.2332744
Li, H. (2024). Education challenges in developing digital competence and critical thinking skills in a post-information age. Culture and Education: Cultura y Educación, 36(2), 419-445. https://doi.org/10.1177/11356405241259598
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 5-55.
Marín, V. I., & Angulo, G. A. (2025). Digital Competence in Quebec ’s Teacher-Education Programs: Toward a Critical Perspective. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 19(5), 45-74. https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v19i5.8957
Messick, S. (1995). Standards of Validity and the Validity of Standards in Performance Asessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 14(4), 5-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1995.tb00881.x
Miao, F., Holmes, W., Huang, R., & Zhang, H. (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). https://doi.org/10.54675/PCSP7350
Ncube, C. N., & Tawanda, T. (2025). Critical digital pedagogy for contemporary transformative practices in the Global South : a literature review Critical digital pedagogy for contemporary transformative practices in the Global South : a literature review. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2523133. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2523133
Olmos-Gómez, M. del C., Portillo-Sánchez, R., & Parra-González, M. E. (2025). Educación Física e Inteligencia Artificial. Validación de un instrumento sobre uso y percepción de la IA en jóvenes. Retos, 67, 46-56. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v67.112460
Oyarzo-Espinosa, J., Joglar-Campos, C., Quintanilla-Gatica, M. R., Sepúlveda-González, R. A., & Soto-Alvarado, M. B. (2025). Inteligencia artificial y controversias sociocientíficas en la enseñanza de las ciencias de la educación superior. Acercamientos y proyecciones a partir de una revisión bibliográfica. Sisyphus - Journal of Education, 13(1), 8-34. https://doi.org/10.25749/sis.36570
Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2020). Marco Europeo para la Competencia Digital de los Educadores: DigCompEdu. (Trad. Fundación Universia y Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional de España). Centro Común de Investigación de la Comisión Europea. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Rose, S. (2025, August 4th). Demis Hassabis on our AI future: ‘It’ll be 10 times bigger than the Industrial Revolution – and maybe 10 times faster.’ The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/aug/04/demis-hassabis-ai-future-10-times-bigger-than-industrial-revolution-and-10-times-faster
Sarıkaya, K., & İnci Kuzu, Ç. (2026). The Evolution of Artificial Intelligence in Mathematical Problem-Solving Processes: A Mathematics Education Perspective. Sage Open, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440261426456
Trejo-Trejo, G. A., & Gordillo-Espinoza, E. (2026). Validación de un instrumento para medir el uso académico de la IAGen en estudiantes universitarios. Pixel-Bit, Revista de Medios y Educación, 75, art. 7. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.117960
Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC). (2025). Institutional Achievements Report 2024. Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC). https://upc-cdn.b-cdn.net/documentos/institucional/Institutional-Achievements-Report-2024-VF.pdf
Vieriu, A. M., & Petrea, G. (2025). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Students’ Academic Development. Education Sciences, 15(3), 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030343
Viñoles-Cosentino, V., Sánchez-Caballé, A., & Esteve-Mon, F. M. (2022). Desarrollo de la Competencia Digital Docente en Contextos Universitarios. Una Revisión Sistemática. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana Sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio En Educación, 20(2), 11-27. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2022.20.2.001
Wang, Q., Ma, Z. , Zhang, G., & Miao, Q (2025). Digital Transformation Driving Educational Reforms in Higher Education: A Paradigm Shift in Teaching and Learning. Beijing International Review of Education, 7(4), 254-272. https://doi.org/10.1177/25902547251395880
Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Wang, J., Tran, T., & Du, Z. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Systems With Applications, 252(Part A), 124167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167
Wang, T., Lund, B. D., Marengo, A., Pagano, A., Mannuru, N. R., Teel, Z. A., & Pange, J. (2023). Exploring the Potential Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on International Students in Higher Education: Generative AI, Chatbots, Analytics, and International Student Success. Applied Sciences, 13(11), 6716. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13116716
Yang, Y., & Green, S. B. (2011). Coefficient Alpha: A Reliability Coefficient for the 21st Century? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(4), 377-392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911406668
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2026 Sisyphus – Revista de Educação

Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0.
O Copyright (c) pertence à Sisyphus – Journal of Education. No entanto, encorajamos que os artigos publicados na revista sejam publicados noutros lugares, desde que seja solicitada a autorização da Sisyphus e os autores integrem a nossa citação de fonte original e um link para o nosso site.
Política de auto-arquivo
É permitido aos autores o auto-arquivo da versão final publicada dos seus artigos em repositórios institucionais, temáticos ou páginas web pessoais e institucionais.
Subscritor DORA
O Instituto de Educação da Universidade de Lisboa, editor da Sisyphus, é um dos subscritores da Declaração de São Francisco sobre Avaliação da Investigação (DORA).


