Health education in diabetes mellitus
a fundamental determinant in the management and dynamic control of the implications of the Disease
Keywords:diabetes mellitus, health education, empowerment
Introduction: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a global public health problem, which will tend to increase exponentially in the coming years, bringing with it high morbidity and mortality, and therefore, enormous human, social and economic costs. It is therefore urgent to stop this epidemic by empowering people with diabetes and the general population to prevent the disease and its complications.
Health education promoted by accredited professionals assumes an effective value, with direct gains in the epidemiological indicators of the health of the individual and community, social and economic of the countries.
Objectives: To determine the differentiated interventions in health education carried out by the nursing team of the Diabetes Unit of the Center Hospital Tondela-Viseu in the first half of 2017.
Methods: The exploratory cross-sectional study was performed on a sample composed of 81 people, predominantly aged, with a mean age of 71.1 years, with 59 people (72.8%), aged 65 years or over, against 22 people (27.2%), aged between 39 and 65, with 50 people (61.7%) male and 31 (38.3%) female. The collection of information was based on the survey of all the consultations requested by the various hospital services, to the nursing team of the Diabetes Unit. It was supported by an ad hoc evaluation grid, created for this purpose and focused on the information existing in the clinical processes.
Results: Type 2 diabetes is predominant in 98.8% of the sample, and the majority (n = 57, 70.4%) of DM were diagnosed. Insulin is the treatment of choice in 80.2% of the cases (n = 65). The main cause of requests for instruction related to the management of insulin administration / treatment in 86.4%. (70 lessons), namely insulin preparation and administration, sites to administer, management of the therapeutic regimen and hypo and hyperglycemia; followed by monitoring of capillary glycemia in 77.8% (63 lessons), foot care, and footwear of the person with Diabetes in 13.6% (11 lessons). Teachings
were made to the person with DM in 31 of the cases (38.3%); there was a need to teach the caregiver in 32 cases (39.5%) and in both cases in 18 cases (22.2%).
Conclusions: The low literacy of the population, namely the elderly, for the management of the health-disease status of people with DM, is evidenced by the need for teaching in patients with a previous diagnosis of DM, and the need to be instructed in health plans. Formal education as health education is essential in the approach to people with Diabetes Mellitus. It aims to enable the person to enjoy the full life, and to stay as healthy as possible. As a therapeutic pillar, health education should be privileged by the health services, in order to help people with DM to manage the dietary pattern and its therapeutic regimen, reducing its complications, morbidity and mortality, and consequently associated costs. It should be carried out by specialized professionals with in-depth scientific knowledge in the area of intervention, which should be further enabled by interpersonal skills added in order to facilitate the process. Emphasis should be placed on family members / caregivers as a complementary part of the training process, as a partner and motivational stimulus.
American Diabetes Association (2010). Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care, 33(1), 62-69.
American Diabetes Association (2014). Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. Diabetes Care, 37(1), 14-80.
American Diabetes Association (2017). Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes. Diabetes Care, 40(1), 11-24.
Araújo, I. M. B., Jesus, R. A. F., Teixeira, M. L., Cunha, A. R. S., Santos, F. M. S., & Miranda, S. R. F. (2018). Literacia em saúde de utentes com hipertensão e diabetes de uma região do norte de Portugal. Revista de Enfermagem Referência, 18, 73-82.
Beck, J., Greenwood, D. A., Blanton, L., Bollinger, S. T., Butcher, M. K., Condon, J. E., Cypress, M., & Wang, J. (2017). 2017 National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Suport. Diabetes Care. DOI: 10.2337/dci17-0025. Cardoso, A. F., Queirós, P., & Ribeiro, C. F. (2015). Intervenções para a aquisição do autocuidado terapêutico da pessoa com diabetes mellitus: revisão sistemática da literatura. Revista portuguesa de saúde pública, 33(2), 246-255.
Cruz, R. S., Leitão, C. E., & Ferreira, P. L. (2016). Determinantes do estado de saúde dos diabéticos. Revista Portuguesa de Endocrinologia, Diabetes e Metabolismo, 11(2), 188-196.
Cunha, M. (2008). Calidad de vida y diabetes: Variables psico-sociales. Millenium, 34, 269-299.
Cunha, M., & Teixeira, C. (2015). “Insulin +Therapy Education Programme”. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Science, 171, 252-256. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.118. Cunha, M., Matos, A. P., Almeida, V., Albuquerque, C., Madureira, A., & Estudantes, 28º CLE. (2016). Adherence to therapeuthic regimen and metabolic control of type 1 diabetes. Atención Primária, 48(1), 151-156.
Despacho n.º 3052/2013 (2013, Fevereiro 26). Regula a Criação das Unidades Coordenadoras Funcionais da Diabetes nos Agrupamentos dos Centros de Saúde e Cria as Unidades Integradas de Diabetes nos Hospitais. Diário da República, 2(40), 7527-7529.
Filho, L.F., & Barros, E. (2013). Medicina Interna na Prática Clínica. Porto Alegre: Artmed.
International Diabetes Federation (2017). Diabetes Atlas de la FID. (8ª ed.). Brussels: International Diabetes Federation.
Menino, E., Dixe, M. A., Louro, M. C. M., & Roque, S. M. B. (2013). Programas de educação dirigidos ao utente com diabetes mellitus tipo 2: revisão sistemática da literatura. Revista de Enfermagem Referência. III série, 10, 135-143.
Nicoll, K.G., Ramser, K. L., Campbell, J.D., Suda, K. J., Lee, M. D., Wood, G. C., Sumter, R., & Hamann, G. L. (2014). Sustainability of Improved Glycemic Control after Diabetes Self-Management Education. Diabetes Spectrum, 27(3), 207-211.
Peixoto. I. (2013). Educação para a Saúde – Contributos para a Prevenção do Cancro. Loures: Lusociência.
Portugal, Ministério da Saúde (2011). Norma n.º 002/2011 de 14/01/2011: Diagnóstico e Classificação da Diabetes Mellitus. Lisboa: Direção Geral da Saúde.
Portugal, Ministério da Saúde, Direção Geral da Saúde (2013). Processo Assistencial Integrado: Diabetes Mellitus tipo 2. Lisboa: Departamento da Qualidade na Saúde, DGS.
Rydén, L., Grant, P. J., Anker, S. D., Berne, C., Cosentino, F., Danchin, N., & Zamorano, J.L. Trad. Brito, C. P. (2014). Recomendações da ESC sobre Diabetes, Pré-Diabetes, e Doenças Cardiovasculares Desenvolvidas em Colaboração com a EASD – Resumo. Revista Portuguesa de Diabetes, 9(1), 12-48.
Santos, H. I. M. (2016). Avaliação de conhecimentos, empoderamento e qualidade de vida em pessoas com Diabetes tipo 2. (Dissertação de mestrado, Instituto Politécnico do Porto). Acedido em https://recipp.ipp.pt/bitstream/10400.22/11233/1/DM_Helena_Santos.pdf.
Seherawat, A. (2014). Diabetes Mellitus: Classification. IOSR Journal oh Pharmacy and Biological Sciences, 9(6), 24-27.
Soares, J., & Cunha, M. (2018). Satisfação com a Equipa, com a Consulta e com o grupo de diabetes em pessoas brasileiras. Millenium, 2ª Série, 5, 53-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0205.05.00163.
Sociedade Brasileira de Diabetes (2016). Diretrizes da Sociedade Brasileira de Diabetes (2015-2016). Rio de Janeiro: AC Farmacêutica, Grupo Editorial Nacional.
Sociedade Portuguesa de Diabetologia (2016). Diabetes: Factos e Números – O Ano de 2015 – Relatório Anual do Observatório Nacional da Diabetes. Lisboa: Sociedade Portuguesa de Diabetologia.
Stanhope, M., & Lancaster, J. (2011). Enfermagem de Saúde Pública. Loures: Lusodidacta.
World Health Organization (2016). Global report on diabetes. Geneva: World Health Organization.
How to Cite
Authors who submit proposals for this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Articles are published under the License Creative Commons, in full open-access, without any cost or fees of any kind to the author or the reader;
b) The authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, allowing the free sharing of work, provided it is correctly attributed the authorship and initial publication in this journal;
c) The authors are permitted to take on additional contracts separately for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, post it to an institutional repository or as a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal;
d) Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg, in institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and citation of published work
Documents required for submission
Article template (Editable format)