Evolution of land use environmental impact of eucalyptus globulus in the context of life cycle assessment

Authors

  • José Vicente Ferreira Instituto Politécnico de Viseu, Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão de Viseu, Viseu, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7596-8065
  • Bruno Esteves Instituto Politécnico de Viseu, Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão de Viseu, CERNAS/IPV, Viseu, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6660-3128
  • Idalina Domingos Instituto Politécnico de Viseu, Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão de Viseu, CERNAS/IPV, Viseu, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4308-1563

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0210e.24485

Keywords:

life cycle assessment, eucalyptus globulus, forest, land use

Abstract

Introduction: The eucalyptus globulus forest area in Continental Portugal has shown a systematic increase over the last 50 years. In 20015 it was the species with the highest forest land occupation representing 26.2% of the total Portuguese forest area. Although between 2005 and 2015 the occupation of the soil by eucalyptus globulus had grown about 7.5%, the existing volume increased slightly 0.2%. The wildfires had a strong impact on this with a total burnt area of 1.1 million hectares during this period.

Objective: Due to its economic value (national leader in exports of high added value) and social (contributes to the generation of thousands of jobs) this study aims to assess the evolution of the environmental impact of eucalyptus globulus on the land use between 2005 and 2015.

Methods: The life cycle assessment methodology is followed and the ILCD 2011 Midpoint+ method available in the SimaPro software was chosen to assess the land use environmental impact.

Results: Land use impact category of 1 m3 of eucalyptus globulus trees, standing, in forest, was 21832 Kg C deficit in 2005 and 23430 Kg c deficit in 2015 that means an increased about 7.3% during this period.

Conclusion: Transformation to forest road (from natural forest) is the process that most contributes for the land use impact with approximately 78%. Forest occupation is the second most important process representing about 19.5% of the total impact category and forest road occupation represents only 3%.

References

Almeida A. (2008). The Eucalyptus in Portugal: Environmental Impacts and Scientific Research (in Portuguese). Silva Lusitana, 16 (2), 275-276.

Brandão M. and Milà i Canals L. (2013). Global Characterisation Factors to Assess Land Use Impacts on Biotic Production. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18, 1243-1252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0381-3

CELPA - Associação da Industria Papeleira, (2016). The sustainability of eucalyptus plantations in Portugal (in Portuguese). Lisboa: Celpa.

Dias A. & Arroja L. (2012). Environmental impacts of eucalypt and maritime pine wood production in Portugal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 37, 368–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.056

Doka G., Hillier W., Kaila S., Köllner T., Kreißig J., Muys B., Quijano J., Salpakivi-Salomaa P., Schweinle J., Swan G. & Wessman H. (2002). The Assessment of Environmental Impacts caused by Land Use in the Life Cycle Assessment of Forestry and Forest Products. Final Report of Working Group 2 “Land use” of COST Action E9. http://ww.seeds4green.org/sites/default/files/COSTE9LandUseDoka.pdf

Faias S., Morais P., Dias S., Morão S., Tomé M., Páscoa F. & Ôchoa P. (2007). FORSEE – A European network of pilot zones for the evaluation of criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management (in Portuguese). Relatório final do projecto nº 20 programa INTERREG IIIB – Espaço Atlântico (pp. 192). Lisboa: Universidade Técnica da Lisboa, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Centro de Estudos Florestais.

Faragò M., Benini L., Sala S., Secchi, M. & Laurent, A. (2019). National inventories of land occupation and transformation flows in the world for land use impact assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 24, 1333–1347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-01581-8

Hauschild, M., Goedkoop, M., Guinee, J., Heijungs, R., Huijbregts, M., Jolliet, O., Margni, M., & de Schryver, A. (2011). Recommendations for life cycle impact assessment in the european context - based on existing environmental impact assessment models and factors (International Reference Life Cycle Data System - ILCD Handbook). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

FLORESTAR, SUSTENTABILIDADE DA FLORESTA (2007). Guia prático de intervenção em áreas florestais sensíveis aos riscos: risco de incêndio/erosão/fitossanitário. Lisboa: Publicação do Gabinete de Gestão IC-EQUAL.

Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e das Florestas (2020 a). Florestas. Fileiras da Floresta. Importância Económica http://www2.icnf.pt/portal/florestas/fileiras/econ

Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e das Florestas (2020 b). Inventário Florestal Nacional - IFN5 e IFN6: Relatório Final http://www2.icnf.pt/portal/florestas/ifn

Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e das Florestas (2019). Portugal Market Report 2019. http://www2.icnf.pt/portal/florestas/fileiras/resource/doc/import-economica/2019-10-31-Portugal-Market-Report-2019.pdf

International Standard Organization (2006 a). EN ISO 14040:2006. Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – principles and framework. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO

International Standard Organization (2006 b). EN ISO 14044:2006. Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – requirements and guidelines. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.

Lopes E., Dias A., Arroja L., Capela I. and Pereira F. (2003) Application of the life cycle assessment to the Portuguese pulp and paper industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00005-7

Milà ì Canals L., Romanyà J. and Cowell S. (2007). Method for assessing impacts on life support functions (LSF) related to the use of ‘fertile land’ in life cycle assessment (LCA). Journal of Cleaner Production, 15 (15), 1426–1440.

Perminova T., Sirina N., Laratte B., Baranovskaya N. and Rikhvanov L. (2016). Methods for land use impact assessment: A review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 60, 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.02.002

Pordata (2020). Base de Dados de Portugal Contemporâneo. Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos. https://www.pordata.pt/

PRé Consultant (2020). SimaPro Software, version 9.1. PRé Consultants. https://simapro.com/

Sandin G., Peters G.M. and Svanström M., (2013). Moving down the cause-effect chain of water and land use impacts: an LCA case study of textile fibres. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 73, 104–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.01.020

Vieira R., Canaveira P., Simões A. & Domingos T. (2010). Industrial hemp or eucalyptus paper? An environmental comparison using life cycle assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15, 368–375. doi:10.1007/s11367-010-0152-y

Werner F., Althaus H., Kunninger T., Richter K. & Jungbluth N. (2007). Life cycle inventories of wood as fuel and construction material. ecoinvent report No 9. Dubendorf: Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-29

How to Cite

Ferreira, J. V., Esteves, B., & Domingos, I. (2022). Evolution of land use environmental impact of eucalyptus globulus in the context of life cycle assessment . Millenium - Journal of Education, Technologies, and Health, 2(10e), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0210e.24485

Issue

Section

Engineering, Technology, Management and Tourism