AI in research, education, and practice of structural and earthquake engineering - a reflection on impacts, challenges, and future directions

Authors

  • Tiago Ferreira College of Arts, Technology and Environment, University of the West of England (UWE Bristol), Bristol, Reino Unido http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6454-7927

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0226.39584

Abstract

The fields of structural and earthquake engineering are critical in ensuring the safety and resilience of our built environment, particularly as global challenges such as urbanization, climate change, and disaster preparedness become increasingly urgent (Ferreira & Santos, 2024). In recent years, the integration of engineering with artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and deep learning (DL) has begun to reshape traditional paradigms. These technologies offer new opportunities to automate processes, enhance predictive accuracy, and optimize designs, paving the way for more efficient, adaptive, and sustainable engineering practices.

Despite its transformative potential, the adoption of AI in structural and earthquake engineering remains relatively underutilized compared to other fields (Tapeh & Naser, 2023; Xie et al., 2020). Traditional mechanics-based methodologies continue to dominate the field, and it remains to be seen how AI-driven approaches will coexist with these established practices, particularly in the professional and educational contexts. Some skepticism surrounding AI’s perceived opacity—often viewed as a "black box" compared to the transparency of experimental, numerical, and analytical methods—further complicates its integration. However, AI’s unparalleled ability to process extensive datasets, execute computationally intensive tasks, and adapt to real-time conditions presents significant opportunities for innovation.

In this editorial, I aim to provide a concise yet comprehensive reflection on AI's current state and transformative potential in structural and earthquake engineering. By looking at its impacts across research, education, and practical implementation, I hope to highlight some opportunities and challenges for AI integration. Furthermore, I will emphasize pressing concerns, such as the importance of fostering interdisciplinary collaboration and addressing the significant environmental footprint of AI technologies—an aspect that, in my view, has not received the attention it deserves.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Borji, A. (2023). A Categorical Archive of ChatGPT Failures (No. arXiv:2302.03494; Version 8). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.03494

Dhar, P. (2020). The carbon impact of artificial intelligence. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2(8), 423–425. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-0219-9

Estêvão, J. M. C. (2024). Effectiveness of Generative AI for Post-Earthquake Damage Assessment. Buildings, 14(10), 3255. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14103255

Ferreira, T. M., & Santos, P. P. (2024). Multi-hazard risk assessment for resilient and sustainable urban areas. Natural Hazards, 120(10), 9107–9109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-024-06760-5

Frieder, S., Pinchetti, L., Griffiths, R.-R., Salvatori, T., Lukasiewicz, T., Petersen, P., & Berner, J. (2023). Mathematical Capabilities of ChatGPT. In A. Oh, T. Naumann, A. Globerson, K. Saenko, M. Hardt, & S. Levine (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 27699–27744. Curran Associates, Inc. http://surl.li/ciukzf

Gupta, J. (2024, September 9). The hidden cost of the AI boom. TEDEd. https://ed.ted.com/blog/2024/09/09/the-hidden-cost-of-the-ai-boom

Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. (2019). A brief history of artificial intelligence: On the past, present, and future of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619864925

Javed, A. A., Pan, W., Chen, L., & Zhan, W. (2018). A systemic exploration of drivers for and constraints on construction productivity enhancement. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 8(3), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-10-2017-0099

Kiani, J., Camp, C., & Pezeshk, S. (2019). On the application of machine learning techniques to derive seismic fragility curves. Computers & Structures, 218, 108–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2019.03.004

Kostinakis, K., Morfidis, K., Demertzis, K., & Iliadis, L. (2023). Classification of buildings’ potential for seismic damage using a machine learning model with auto hyperparameter tuning. Engineering Structures, 290, 116359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116359

Lu, X., & Burton, H. (2023). EESD special issue: AI and data‐driven methods in earthquake engineering – (Part 1). Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 52(8), 2299–2302. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3908

Mohy, A. A., Bassioni, H. A., Elgendi, E. O., & Hassan, T. M. (2024). Innovations in safety management for construction sites: the role of deep learning and computer vision techniques. Construction Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-04-2023-0062

Shah, P. (2023). AI and the Future of Education: Teaching in the Age of Artificial Intelligence (1st Edition). Jossey-Bass.

Spencer, B. F., Hoskere, V., & Narazaki, Y. (2019). Advances in Computer Vision-Based Civil Infrastructure Inspection and Monitoring. Engineering, 5(2), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2018.11.030

Strubell, E., Ganesh, A., & Mccallum, A. (2020). Energy and Policy Considerations for Modern Deep Learning Research. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 34(9), 13693–13696. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v34i09.7123

Sun, H., Burton, H. V., & Huang, H. (2021). Machine learning applications for building structural design and performance assessment: State-of-the-art review. Journal of Building Engineering, 33, 101816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101816

Talha Junaid, M., Barakat, S., Awad, R., Anwar, N. (2024). Adopting the Power of AI Chatbots for Enriching Students Learning in Civil Engineering Education: A Study on Capabilities and Limitations. In: Al-Marzouqi, A., Salloum, S.A., Al-Saidat, M., Aburayya, A., Gupta, B. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education: The Power and Dangers of ChatGPT in the Classroom. Studies in Big Data, vol 144. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52280-2_3

Tapeh, A. T. G., & Naser, M. Z. (2023). Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Deep Learning in Structural Engineering: A Scientometrics Review of Trends and Best Practices. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 30 (1), 115–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-022-09793-w

Vidalis, S. M., & Subramanian, R. (2023). Impact of AI Tools on Engineering Education. Fall Mid Atlantic Conference: Meeting Our Students Where They Are and Getting Them Where They Need to Be, 40852

Xie, Y., Ebad Sichani, M., Padgett, J. E., & DesRoches, R. (2020). The promise of implementing machine learning in earthquake engineering: A state-of-the-art review. Earthquake Spectra, 36(4), 1769–1801. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020919419

Zhou, G., Zhang, C., Li, Z., Ding, K., & Wang, C. (2020). Knowledge-driven digital twin manufacturing cell towards intelligent manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 58(4), 1034–1051. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1607978

Published

2025-01-02

How to Cite

Ferreira, T. (2025). AI in research, education, and practice of structural and earthquake engineering - a reflection on impacts, challenges, and future directions. Millenium - Journal of Education, Technologies, and Health, (26), e39584. https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0226.39584

Issue

Section

Editorial