Promotion of autonomy and self-regulation in higher education students

construction of a teaching and learning module insert in the project “interdisciplinary collaborative approaches to learning and teaching"

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0215.23262

Keywords:

ERASMUS project, learning, foreign language, higher education, students

Abstract

Introduction: In the context of participation in an ERASMUS + project “Interdisciplinary Collaborative Approaches to Learning and Teaching - INCOLLAB”, we propose to assay its innovative character in the field of pedagogy in higher education, highlighting the dimension of integrated learning of a foreign language and a content (Content and Language Integrated Learning)- CLIL) and collaboration between higher education teachers in planning learning modules and teaching materials based on a interdisciplinary design and intervention.

Objective: Asses the learning of a foreign language through the project methodology.

Methods: The methodology followed was that of an action-research, supported by a community of learning and practice. This modality allowed the professors of the universities involved in the project, from the areas of foreign language and different content areas (Psychology, Economics, Management ...), to share knowledge, skills and pedagogical perspectives, projecting this experience in the design and implementation of multidisciplinary modules in learning processes.

Results: As an example of the work developed, we present the module “Autonomy Support: Through collaboration towards self-regulated learning strategies” which, based on the conceptual model of Deci & Ryan (1985, 2004), aims to constitute itself as an educational resource available, on an online platform, to professionals who can adapt it to other educational context. Having been conceived and applied experimentally to students of the 1st year of graduation, in the context of the Psychology of Development course unit, it can be adapted to any training area, mobilizing skills in the English language at level B1.

Conclusion: The option for the theme of the module is based on the conception that the autonomy and self-regulation skills are transversal to academic success in higher education and future professional performance.

References

Bonces, J. (2012). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): Considerations in the Colombian Context. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, nº 6, 177-189. Retrived from https://issuu.com/jeiteachnice/docs/content_and_language_integrated_lea.

Bound, D. (1988). Moving towards autonomy. In Boud, D.J. (Ed.), Developing Student Autonomy in Learning, Second edition (pp. 17-39). London: Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203059036

Bound, D. (1995). Assessment and learning: Contraditory or complementary? In P. Knight (Ed.). Assessment for Learning in Higher Education (pp. 35-48). London: RoutledgeFalmer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203062074

Bryant, P. (1995). Collaborative Action Research – On the cutting edge (Master thesis). University of Lethbridge, Alberta (Canada). Retrieved from https://opus.uleth.ca/bitstream/handle/10133/849/Bryant_Paul.pdf

Clifford, V. (1997). Self-directed learning as a vehicle to becoming a researcher. Proceedings of Higher Education Research and Development. Society of Australasia Conference, University of Adelaide, published on CD Rom July (1997), 176-183. Retrived from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301202939.

Clifford, V. (2006). The Development of Autonomous Learners in a University Setting. Higher Education Research & Development, 18:1, 115-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0729436990180109.

Connell, J. & Wellborn, J. (1991) Competence, Autonomy, and Relatedness: A Motivational Analysis of Self- System Processes. In M. Gunnar, M.R. & L. (Eds.), Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology, Vol. 23, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 43-77.

Costa, F. (2016). CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) – Through English in Italian Higher Education. Retrived from https://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=mcafee_uninternational&type=E211PT714G0&p=Costa%2C+F.+(2016).+CLIL+(Content+and+Language+Integrated+.

Coyle, D. (2002). From little acorns. In D. So & G. Jones (Eds.), Education and society in plurilingual contexts (pp.37–55). Brussels University Press.

Coyle, D. (2010). Language pedagogies revisited: Alternative approaches for integrating language learning, language using and intercultural understanding. In J. Miller, A. Kostogriz, & M. Gearon (Eds). Culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms: New Dilemmas for teachers (pp. 172–195). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Coyle, D. (2015). Strengthening integrated learning: Towards a new era for pluriliteracies and intercultural learning. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 8(2), 84-103, doi:10.5294/laclil.2015.8.2.2.

Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and selfdetermination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (Org.). (2002). The handbook of self-determination research. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.

Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2008). Self-Determination Theory: A Macrotheory of Human Motivation, Development, and Health.Canadian Psychology, 49 (3), 182–185. https:// https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801

Hammond, M. & Collins, R. (1991). Self-directed learning: Critical practice. London: Nichols/GP Publishing.

Hezemans, M. & Ritzen, M. (2005). Communities of Practice in Higher Education. Information and Communication Technologies and Real-Life Learning, 182, 39-46. Retrived from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/0-387-25997-X_5.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

Marsh, D. (2002). Content and Language Integrated Learning: The European Dimension-Actions, Trends and Foresight Potential. Retrived from http://europa.eu.int/comm/education/languages/index.html.

McDermott, R. (2001). Knowing in Community: 10 Critical Success Factors in Building Communities of Practice. http://www.co-I-l.com/coil/knowledgegarden/cop/knowing.shtml

Morgado, M., & Coelho, M. (2013). CLIL vs English as the Medium of Instruction: the Portuguese Higher Education Polytechnic Context. Egitania Sciencia Journal, 12, 123-145.

Ryan, R. & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55 (1), 68-78.

Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2004). The Independent Effets of Goal Contents and Motives on Well-Being: It’s both what you porsue and why you porsue. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(4), 475-486 DOI: 10.1177/0146167203261883.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wenger, E., & Snyder, W. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78, 139-145.

Vansteenkiste, M., Niemiec, C., & Soenens, B. (2010). The development of the five mini-theories of Self Determination Theory: Na historical overview, emerging trends and future directions. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 16 A, 105-165. Retrived from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235294924_The_development_of_the_five_minitheories_of_selfdetermination_theory_An_historical_overview_emerging_trends_andfuture_directions.

Published

2021-05-27

Issue

Section

Education and Social Development Sciences