Peer-assisted learning
undergraduate medical students’ perception and satisfaction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0216.23989Keywords:
peer-assisted learning, medical education, professional development, student teachingAbstract
Introduction: Peer-assisted learning (PAL) is a teaching method that develops new knowledge and skills through active learning support from peers.
Objectives: To assess the impact of PAL in medical education, by collecting quantitative data that explore its effectiveness. To evaluate students’ perception of and satisfaction with PAL.
Methods: A 5-point Likert scale survey was developed for students participating in the PAL program either as tutors or learners. Data were compared and statistically analyzed according to gender, GPA, and year of study. Moreover, follow up of peer tutors and peer learner’s achievement was done through comparing their grades with those that not shared in PAL and with their GPA of previous year.
Results: Statistical analysis of questionnaire data revealed that medical students regarded voluntary peer-teaching similarly to faculty teaching and have a generally positive perception of PAL. Most of the respondents reported that they benefited both professionally and personally from PAL activities. They recommended expanding the role of PAL and officially incorporating PAL sessions into the curriculum. Students’ achievement was significantly increased for those who acted as peer learners and peer tutors.
Conclusions: Using PAL in conjunction with other teaching and learning methods provides additional value by fostering cooperation and social interaction among medical students and further prepares them for their future role as medical science educators. Additional research into the impact of PAL on academic achievement, both short- and long-term learning outcomes, in medical programs is warranted.
Downloads
References
Diana, S. (2018). The effect of peer assisted learning (PAL) on anatomic competencies of prospective student’s biology teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1), article id. 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012015
Yu, T.C., Wilson, N.C., Singh, P.P., Lemanu, D,P., Hawken, S.J., Hill, A.G. (2011). Medical students-as-teachers: a systematic review of peer assisted teaching during medical school. Adv Med Educ Pract, 23 (2), 157-72. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S14383.
Carey, M.C., Chick, A., Kent, B., Latour, J.M. (2018). An exploration of peer-assisted learning in undergraduate nursing students in paediatric clinical settings: An ethnographic study. Nurse Educ Today, 65, 212-217. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
Bulte, C., Betts, A., Garner, K., Durning, S. (2007). Student teaching: views of student near-peer teachers and learners. Med Teach, 29(6), 583–90. doi: 10.1080/01421590701583824. PMID: 17922356.
Durán, C.E.P., Bahena, E.N., MdlÁG, R., Baca, G.J., Uresti, A.S., Elizondo-Omaña, R.E., López, S.G. (2012). Near-peer teaching in an anatomy course with a low faculty-to-student ratio. AnatAnatSci Educ, 5(3), 171-6. doi: 10.1002/ase.1269. Epub 2012
Rengier, F., Rauch, P.J., Partovi, S., Kirsch, J., Nawrotzki, R. (2010). A three-day anatomy revision course taught by senior peers effectively prepares junior students for their national anatomy exam. Ann Anat-AnatAnz, 192(6), 396–9. doi:10.12968/ippr.2015.5.1.22
Jackson, T., Evans, D. (2012). Can medical students teach? A near-peer-led teaching program for year 1 students. AdvPhysiol Educ, 36(3), 192–6. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00035.2012
Wun, Y., Tse, E.Y., Lam, T., Lam, C.L. (2007). PBL curriculum improves medical students’ participation in small-group tutorials. Med Teach, 29(6), e198–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21124
Nestel, D., Kidd, J. (2005). Peer assisted learning in patient-centred interviewing: the impact on student tutors. Med Teach, 27(5), 439–44. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_890_20
Blank WA, Blankenfeld H, Vogelmann R, Linde K, Schneider A. (2013). Can near-peer medical students effectively teach a new curriculum in physical examination? BMC Med Educ, 13(1), 165.
Kühl, M., Wagner, R., Bauder, M., Fenik, Y., Riessen, R., Lammerding-Köppel, M., Gawaz, M., Fateh-Moghadam, S., Weyrich, P., Celebi, N. (2012). Student tutors for hands-on training in focused emergency echocardiography–a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ, 29(12):101
Meller, S.M., Chen, M., Chen, R., Haeseler, FD. (2013). Near-peer teaching in a required third-year clerkship. Yale J Biol Med, 86(4), 583.
Bugaj, T.J., Mucksch, C., Schmid, C., Junne, F., Erschens, R., Herzog, W., Nikendei, C. (2016). Peer-led Stress Prevention Seminars in the First Year of Medical School--A Project Report. GMS J Med Educ, 33(1),Doc3. doi: 10.3205/zma001002.
Gazula, S., McKenna, L., Cooper, S., Paliadelis, P. (2017). A systematic review of reciprocal peer tutoring within tertiary health profession educational programs. Health Prof Educ, 3(2), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2016.12.001
Burgess, A., Dornan, T., Clarke, A.J., Menezes, A., Mellis, C. (2016). Peer tutoring in a medical school: perceptions of tutors and tutees. BMC Med Educ, 85, 8-16. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0589-1
Khaw, C., Raw, L. (2016). The outcomes and acceptability of near-peer teaching among medical students in clinical skills. Int J Med Educ, 7, 189–195. doi:10.5116/ijme.5749.7b8b
Omar, F., Zaheer, M., Ahmed, M.1. (2018). Effectiveness of peer teaching in medical education: medical student's perspective. Adv Med EducPract, 23(9), 199-201. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S161507
Dandavino, M., Snell, L., Wiseman, J. (2007). Why medical students should learn how to teach. Med Teach, 29, 558–65. doi: 10.1080/01421590701477449
Nestel, D., Kidd, J. (2003). Peer tutoring in patient-centered interviewing skills: experience of a project for first year students. Med Teach, 25(4), 398–403. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/15018.6323
Khaw, C., Raw, L. (2016). The outcomes and acceptability of near-peer teaching among medical students in clinical skills. Int J Med Educ, 7, 189–195. doi:10.5116/ijme.5749.7b8b
Benè, K.L., Bergusm G. (2014);. When learners become teachers: a review of peer teaching in medical student education. Fam Med, 46(10), 783–787.
Khalid, H., Shahid, S., Punjabi, N., Sahdev, N. (2018). An integrated 2-year clinical skills peer tutoring scheme in a UK-based medical school: perceptions of tutees and peer tutors. Adv Med EducPract, 9, 423–432.
doi:10.2147/AMEP.S159502.
Rashid, M., Sobowale, O., Gore, D. (2011). A near-peer teaching program designed, developed and delivered exclusively by recent medical graduates for final year medical students sitting the final objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). BMC Med Educ, 11(1), 11. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-11.
AlShareef, S.M., Aldayel, A.Y., Alghamdi, H.M., Alosaimi, M.B., Alharbi, M.M., Aldayel, A.A., Alhussain, H.A. (2019). Perceptions On Reciprocal Peer Teaching Among Medical Students As Learners And As Tutors. Adv Med EducPract, 10, 817-827.
Alvarez, S., Nikendei, C., Schultz, JH. 2017. Development of a didactical training concept for peer tutors in gross anatomy. AnatSci Educ, 10(5), 495–502. doi:10.1002/ase.1691
Hsiao, Y.P. (Amy)., Brouns, F., Bruggen, J.V., Sloep, P.B. (2015). Effects of training peer tutors in content knowledge versus tutoring skills on giving feedback to help tutees’ complex tasks. Educ Stud, 41(5), 499–512. doi:10.1080/03055698.2015.1062079
Shiozawa, T., Hirt, B., Celebi, N., Werner, A., Weyrich, P., Lammerding-Koeppel, M. (2010). Does a combined technical and didactical training program improve the acceptance of student tutors in the dissection course? A prospective controlled randomized study. Ann Anat, 192(6), 361–365. doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2010.09.006
Leung, Kim. Chau. (2019). An updated meta-analysis on the effect of peer tutoring on tutors’ achievemen. School Psychology International, 40(2), 200-214. doi: 10.1177/0143034318808832
Akudo, A.H., Eberechukwu, A.S. (2018). Gender differences on medical students’ perception of peer tutoring learning strategy on clinical skills training at MacArthur clinical skills laboratory (mcsl). Br J Educ, 6(5), 1–8.
Langan, M.A., Wheater, P.C., Shaw, E.M., et al. (2005). Peer assessment of oral presentations: effects of student gender, University affiliation and participation in the development of assessment criteria. Assess Eval High Educ, 30(1), 21–34. doi:10.1080/0260293042003243878
Tai, J., Canny, B., Molloy, E., Haines, T. (2017). Gender matters: students’ perceptions of peer learning in clinical education. Focus Health Prof Educ, 18(1), 3–15. doi:10.11157/fohpe.v18i1.203
Peterson, D.A.M., Biederman, L.A., Andersen, D., Ditonto, T.M., Roe, K., Wilson, R.K. (2019). Mitigating gender bias in student evaluations of teaching. PLoS One, 14(5) ,e0216.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216241
Maynard, J., and Almarzouqi, I. (2006). “Investigating peer tutoring”. ELT Journal, 60(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci077.
Comfort, P. (2011). The effect of peer tutoring on academic achievement during practical assessments in applied sports science students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(2), 207-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2011.564015
Kim, S.C., Jillapali, R., Boyd, S. (2021). Impacts of peer tutoring on academic performance of first-year baccalaureate nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Today, 96, 104658. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104658
Abedini, M., Mortazavi, F., Javadinia, S. A., &Moonaghi, H. K. (2013). A new teaching approach in basic sciences: Peer assisted learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 39-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.008
Ward, P., and Lee, M. (2005). “Peer-assisted learning in physical education: a review of theory andresearch”. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 24 (3), 205-225.
https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.24.3.205
Roscoe, R.D., and Chi, M.T.H. (2007). “Understanding tutor learning: knowledge-building andknowledge telling in peer tutors’ explanations and questions”. Review of Education Research, 77(4), 534-578. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796.002
Donohoe, C.L., Conneely, J.B., Zilbert, N., Hennessy, M., Schofield, S., Reynolds, J.V. (2015). DocemurDocemus: Peer-Assisted Learning Improves the Knowledge Gain of Tutors in the Highest Quartile of Achievement but Not Those in the Lowest Quartile. J Surg Educ, 72(6), 1139-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.07.001.
Bennett, S.R., Morris, S.R., Mirza, S. (2018). Medical Students Teaching Medical Students Surgical Skills: The Benefits of Peer-Assisted Learning. J Surg Educ, 75(6), 1471-1474. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.03.011.
Schauseil-Zipf, U., Karay, Y., Ehrlich, R., Knoop, K., Michalk, D. (2010). Peer teaching in paediatrics - medical students as learners and teachers on a paediatric course. GMS Z Med Ausbild, 27(5), Doc71. doi: 10.3205/zma000708.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit proposals for this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Articles are published under the Licença Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0), in full open-access, without any cost or fees of any kind to the author or the reader;
b) The authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, allowing the free sharing of work, provided it is correctly attributed the authorship and initial publication in this journal;
c) The authors are permitted to take on additional contracts separately for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, post it to an institutional repository or as a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal;
d) Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg, in institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and citation of published work
Documents required for submission
Article template (Editable format)
