Eutectic mixture of local anesthetics’ dosage in newborns

a scoping review

Authors

  • Fátima Prior Hospital Dr. José de Almeida, Unidade de Cuidados Especiais Neonatais e Unidade de Cuidados Intermédios Pediátricos, Cascais, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2781-4314
  • Débora Querido Hospital Dr. José de Almeida, Unidade de Cuidados Especiais Neonatais e Unidade de Cuidados Intermédios Pediátricos, Cascais, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6756-2938
  • Íris Santos Hospital Dr. José de Almeida, Unidade de Cuidados Especiais Neonatais e Unidade de Cuidados Intermédios Pediátricos, Cascais, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1953-0349

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0219.27268

Keywords:

newborn, pain, local anesthetics, EMLA Cream

Abstract

Introduction: Although Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetics (EMLA) is an easily available solution, it is not yet widely used in neonatal care due to the lack of evidence of an effective administration dosage.

Objectives: Identify how EMLA cream is used to reduce pain, without adverse reaction, in newborn infants undergoing painful medical procedures.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted to map literature concerning a population, concept, context (PCC) question, considering literature from electronic databases and gray literature, published between 2002 and 2021, with full-text available and with no language restrictions.

Results: Twelve documents concerning a 2661 newborn population – from 28 weeks gestational age until full-term newborns – considering EMLA cream efficacy and describing EMLA cream’s amount and skin contact time. Eight protocols recommend the use of an occlusive dressing. One paper identified pallor and erythema reactions.

Conclusion: EMLA is effective when used in newborns undergoing painful procedures. Although there is no consensus on EMLA cream’s dosage, the most frequent amount used is 0,5g in pre-term newborns and 1g in full-term newborns. The most common time of skin contact is 60 minutes. Although this is the most frequent dosage, the amount ranges from 0,5 up to 2g, and the time of skin contact ranges from 3 to 180 minutes. Most of the protocols have included occlusive dressing use.

References

Al Qahtani, R., Abu-Salem, L. Y., & Pal, K. (2014). Effect of lidocaine-prilocaine eutectic mixture of local anaesthetic cream compared with oral sucrose or both in alleviating pain in neonatal circumcision procedure. African Journal of Paediatric Surgery: AJPS, 11(1), 56–61. https://doi.org/10.4103/0189-6725.129236

Anand, J. S. (2019). Discovering Pain in Newborn Infants. Anesthesiology, 131, 392–395 https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002810

Autoridade Nacional do Medicamento e Produtos de Saúde. (2016). Emla 25 mg/g + 25 mg/g creme lidocaína + prilocaína. Retrieved from: https://cdn.121doc.com/images/pt/product/8/Emla.pdf

Biran, V., Gourrier, E., Cimerman, P., Walter-Nicolet, E., Mitanchez, D., & Carbajal, R. (2011). Analgesic effects of EMLA cream and oral sucrose during venipuncture in preterm infants. Pediatrics, 128(1), e63-70. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-1287

Brady-Fryer, B., Wiebe, N., & Lander, J.A. (2004). Pain relief for neonatal circumcision. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, Art. No.: CD004217 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004217.pub2

Direção-Geral da Saúde (2012). Norma:024/2012- Orientações técnicas sobre o controlo da dor nos recém-nascidos (0 a 28 dias). Retrieved from:https://www.dgs.pt/directrizes-da-dgs/orientacoes-e-circulares-informativas/orientacao-n-0242012-de-18122012-png.aspx

Dutta, S. (1999). Use of eutectic mixture of local anesthetics in children. The Indian Journal of Pediatics, 66(5), 707-715. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02726260

European Medicines Agency. (s.d.). Resumo da avaliação científica do EMLA creme e nomes associados. Retrieved from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/documents/referral/emla-cream-article-30-referral-annex-ii_pt.pdf

Frey, B., & Kehrer, B. (1999). Toxic methaemoglobin concentrations in premature infants after application of a prilocaine-containing cream and peridural prilocaine. European Journal of Pediatics, 158(10), 785-788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004310051204

Gradin, M., Eriksson, M., Holmqvist, G., Holstein, A., & Schollin, J. (2002). Pain reduction at venipuncture in newborns: oral glucose compared with local anesthetic cream. Pediatrics, 110(6), 1053-1057. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.110.6.1053

Guzmán-Arteaga, A. N., Fajardo-Ochoa, F., Ramírez-Rodríguez, C. A., & Alvarez-Hernández, G. (2013). Efecto Analgésico de la Solución Glucosada al 25% vs Crema EMLA. Evaluación por la Escala de PIPP. Boletin Clinico Hospital Infantil Del Estado de Sonora, 30(2), 56–62.

Halimaa, S. L. (2003). Pain management in nursing procedures on premature babies. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 42(6), 587-597. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02662.x

Kaur, G., Gupta, P., & Kumar, A. (2003). A randomized trial of eutectic mixture of local anesthetics during lumbar puncture in newborns. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 157(11), 1065–1070. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.157.11.1065

Modekwe, V. I., Ugwu, J. O., Ekwunife, O. H., Osuigwe, A. N., Obiechina, S. O., Okpalike, I. V., & Orakwe, J. C. (2019). Comparison of the efficacy of eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) and dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) in neonatal circumcision. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, 22(12), 1737–1741. https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_266_19

Mucignat, V., Ducrocq, S., Lebas, F., Mochel, F., Baudon, J.J., & Gold, F. (2004). Analgesic effects of Emla cream and saccharose solution for subcutaneous injections in preterm newborns: a prospective study of 265 injections. Archives de Pédiatrie, 11(8):921-925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcped.2004.03.028

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372: n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C., McInerney, P., Munn, Z., Tricco, A.C., & Khalil, H. (2020). Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews. In: Aromataris, E., Munn, Z. (Editors). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-12

Rocha, G., Proença, E., Fernandes, P., Matos, A., Costa, T., Carreiro, H., & et al. (2004). Analgesia e Sedação. Secção de Neonatologia, Consensos Nacionais em Neonatologia. Sociedade Portuguesa de Pediatria, pp. 45- 52. Retrieved from: https://www.spneonatologia.pt/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/201107201730-consensos_neonatologia__2004.pdf

Sharara-Chami, R., Lakissian, Z., Charafeddine, L., Milad, N., & El-Hout, Y. (2017). Combination Analgesia for Neonatal Circumcision: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pediatrics, 140(6):e20171935. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-1935

Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., Lewin, S., & et al. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMAScR): Checklist and Explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169, 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

Downloads

Published

2022-09-30

How to Cite

Prior, F., Querido, D., & Santos, Íris. (2022). Eutectic mixture of local anesthetics’ dosage in newborns: a scoping review . Millenium - Journal of Education, Technologies, and Health, 2(19), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0219.27268

Issue

Section

Life and Healthcare Sciences