Successory rights the inheritance of biological parents after traffic in adoption procedure

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29352/mill029e.21306

Keywords:

succession, heritage, adoption

Abstract

Introduction: This study unfolds on inheritance rights the inheritance of post-transit biological parents in an adoption process. Since the right of inheritance is non-transferable and that the biological bond despite being suppressed with the adoption sentence, the exclusion of the right of inheritance to the biological father is relative.

Objective: To show that the right of inheritance of biological parents in the case of children and adolescents who were adopted is possible and should be used as an analogy in relation to cases of multipaternity records,

Method: The approach was qualitative, since the concepts of adoption were analyzed, as well as the affiliation and all this relationship of affective and biological affiliation, which will contribute to conclude on the theme. The research was bibliographic as well as documentary. Using as theoretical references Fábio Ulhoa Coelho, Melina Trajano Fechine, Pablo Stolze Gagliano and Rodolfo Pamplona Filho; with regard to documents, specific jurisprudential decisions were observed and studied and verifying the position that the Courts, whether or not they have been granting the right to inheritance, in the absence of double paternity registration.

Results: We consider that this matter has not yet been regulated, and there is a need for jurisprudential changes according to the specific cases presented.

Conclusion: Socio-affective paternity does not prevent the bond from being recognized, with its own legal effects. In this sense, the adopted child would be entitled to the inheritance (patrimony) left by the biological father, even if there is no record of multipaternity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BRASIL. Código Civil (2002). Brasília, DF: Senado Federal.

_______. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil (1988). Brasília, DF: Senado Federal.

_______. Lei nº 8.069, de 13 de julho de 1990 (1990). Estatuto da criança e do adolescente. Acedido em: <http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/LEIS/L8069.htm>.

COELHO, F. U. (2006). Curso de direito Civil. São Paulo: Saraiva. V. 5.

FECHINE, M. T. (2017) Direito dos pais multiparentais na sucessão dos seus filhos. 2017. 80 f. Monografia (Graduação em Direito)-Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina, Tubarão.

GAGLIANO, P. S; FILHO, R. P. (2017). Novo curso de direito civil: direito de família. 7. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, v. 6.

RIO GRANDE DO SUL. Tribunal de Justiça. (2017) Apelação Cível n. 70075183095, de Santa Vitória do Palmar. Relator: Des. Ricardo Moreira Lins Pastl. Porto Alegre, 19 de outubro de 2017. Acedido em: <https://tjrs.jusbrasil.com.br/jurisprudencia/513677373/apelacao-civel-ac-70075183095-rs>.

_______. (2016) Apelação Cível nº 70069615979, de Ijuí. Relator: Luiz Felipe Brasil Santos. Porto Alegre, 27 de outubro de 2016. Acedido em: <http://www.tjrs.jus.br/busca/search?q=&proxystylesheet=tjrs_index&client=tjrs_index&filter=0&getfields=*&aba=juris&entsp=a__politicasite&wc=200&wc_mc=1&oe=UTF-8&ie=UTF-8&ud=1&sort=date%3AD%3AS%3Ad1&as_qj=&site=ementario&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&partialfields=n%3A70069615979.%28td%3Aac%C3%B3rd%C3%A3o%7Ctd%3Anull%29&as_q=+#main_res_juris>.

RIZZARDO, A. (2015). Direito das Sucessões. 9 ed., rev., atual. e ampl. Rio de Janeiro: Forense.

SANTA CATARINA. Tribunal de Justiça. (2016). Embargos infringentes n. 2014.084742-5, de Lages. Relator: Des. Newton Trisotto. Florianópolis, 17 de março de 2016. Acedido em: <https://tj-sc.jusbrasil.com.br/jurisprudencia/321809049/embargosinfringentes-ei-20140847425-lages-2014084742-5/inteiro-teor-321809189>.

_______. (2017). Agravo de Instrumento n. 0009965-03.2016.8.24.0000, de Itajaí. Relator: Des. Joel Figueira Júnior. Florianópolis, 29 de julho de 2017. Acedido em: <https://tj-sc.jusbrasil.com.br/jurisprudencia/482803499/agravo-de-instrumento-ai-99650320168240000-itajai-0009965-0320168240000/inteiro-teor-482803513>.

_______. (2017). Apelação Cível n. 0008501-29.2013.8.24.0038, de Joinville. Relator: Des. Rubens Schulz. Florianópolis, 28 de setembro de 2017. Acedido em: <http://busca.tjsc.jus.br/jurisprudencia/html.do?q=&only_ementa=&frase=&id=AABAg7AAEAAEM0GAAD&categoria=acordao_5>.

_______. (2018). Apelação Cível n. 0302674-93.2015.8.24.0037, de Joaçaba. Relator: Des.Saul Steil. Florianópolis, 17 de abril de 2018. Acedido em: < https://tjsc.jusbrasil.com.br/jurisprudencia/569422736/apelacao-civel-ac-3026749320158240037-joacaba-0302674-9320158240037/inteiro-teor-569422758>.

Published

2021-11-30

How to Cite

Castro, V. (2021). Successory rights the inheritance of biological parents after traffic in adoption procedure . Millenium - Journal of Education, Technologies, and Health, 2(9e), 339–344. https://doi.org/10.29352/mill029e.21306

Issue

Section

Engineering, Technology, Management and Tourism