Personas de bajos ingresos y comportamiento proambiental
más allá de los problemas de dinero, una revisión de literatura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0214.19981Palabras clave:
bajos ingresos, comportamiento proambiental, autoeficaciaResumen
Introducción: La pobreza y los problemas ambientales son dos preocupaciones principales que enfrenta la humanidad en su búsqueda de una mejor calidad de vida.
Objetivo: Relacionar estos dos temas al revisar la literatura sobre personas de bajos ingresos y su comportamiento pro ambiental desde una perspectiva psicológica y de gestión ambiental.
Métodos: En la búsqueda de los artículos que se iban a revisar se tuvieron en cuenta tres criterios principales: 1. los artículos están relacionados con un cierto tipo de comportamiento pro ambiental en un contexto específico y tienen un enfoque de gestión ambiental; 2. las personas de bajos ingresos son el foco central de la investigación, no solo otro aspecto sociodemográfico; 3. los artículos se basan en una de las dos principales teorías psicológicas aplicadas a la gestión ambiental y el comportamiento pro ambiental, la teoría cognitiva social y la teoría del comportamiento planificado.
Resultados: Los once artículos analizados comparten la conclusión de que los factores psicológicos, especialmente la autoeficacia, contribuyen a una mejor comprensión de las posibilidades e impedimentos para que las personas de bajos ingresos practiquen un comportamiento pro ambiental.
Conclusión: Los artículos van más allá del análisis relacionado con los ingresos, que socava la problemática de un problema de dinero. Ellos, contribuyen significativamente a la mejora de las políticas que pueden incluir a las personas de bajos ingresos en el esfuerzo por preservar la naturaleza.
Descargas
Citas
Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2013). Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: A meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change, 23(6), 1773–1785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.029
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x
Al Mamun, A., Fazal, S. A., Ahmad, G. B., Yaacob, M. R. B., & Mohamad, M. R. (2018). Willingness to Pay for Environmentally Friendly Products among Low-Income Households along Coastal Peninsular Malaysia. Sustainability, 10(5), 1316. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051316
Al Mamun, A., Masud, M. M., Fazal, S. A., & Muniady, R. (2019). Green vehicle adoption behavior among low-income households: Evidence from coastal Malaysia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(26), 27305–27318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05908-2
Al Mamun, A., Mohamad, M. R., Yaacob, M. R. B., & Mohiuddin, M. (2018). Intention and behavior towards green consumption among low-income households. Journal of Environmental Management, 227(January), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.061
Al Mamun, A., Mohiuddin, M., Ahmad, G. Bin, Thurasamy, R., & Fazal, S. A. (2018). Recycling intention and behavior among low-income households. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072407
Ardoin, N., Heimlich, J., Braus, J., & Merrick, C. (2013). Influencing Conservation Action: What Research Says About Environmental Literacy, Behavior, and Conservation Results.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought & action. Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control (Seventh printing, 2003). W.H. Freeman and Company.
Behbehani, L., & Prokopy, L. (2017). The Apropriation of Built Heritage and Pro-environmental Behaviours. International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR, 11(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v11i1.1195
Boomsma, C., Jones, R. V., Pahl, S., & Fuertes, A. (2019). Do psychological factors relate to energy saving behaviours in inefficient and damp homes? A study among English social housing residents. Energy Research & Social Science, 47, 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.09.007
Chen, C., Xu, X., & Day, J. K. (2017). Thermal comfort or money saving? Exploring intentions to conserve energy among low-income households in the United States. Energy Research &Amp; Social Science, 26, 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.01.009
Chen, M.-F. (2015). Self-efficacy or collective efficacy within the cognitive theory of stress model: Which more effectively explains people’s self-reported proenvironmental behavior? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.02.002
Clayton, S., Devine-Wright, P., Swim, J., Bonnes, M., Steg, L., Whitmarsh, L., & Carrico, A. (2016). Expanding the role for psychology in addressing environmental challenges. American Psychologist, 71(3), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039482
Ding, Z., Jiang, X., Liu, Z., Long, R., Xu, Z., & Cao, Q. (2018). Factors affecting low-carbon consumption behavior of urban residents: A comprehensive review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 132, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.013
Hafner, R. J., Pahl, S., Jones, R. V., & Fuertes, A. (2020). Energy use in social housing residents in the UK and recommendations for developing energy behaviour change interventions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 251, 119643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119643
Kibert, N. C. (2018). Green Justice: A Holistic Approach To Environmental Injustice. Florida State Universitu Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law, 17(1), 169–182.
Raath, S., & Hay, A. (2016). Self-efficacy: A South African case study on teachers’ commitment to integrate climate change resilience into their teaching practices. Cogent Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1264698
Russell-Bennett, R., Mulcahy, R., Little, J.-A., & Swinton, T. (2018). Money or mind? What matters most in influencing low-income earners to be energy efficient? Journal of Social Marketing, 8(1), 2–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-08-2016-0039
Samaddar, S., Chatterjee, R., Misra, B., & Tatano, H. (2014). Outcome-expectancy and self-efficacy: Reasons or results of flood preparedness intention? International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 8, 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.02.002
Tabernero, C., & Hernández, B. (2011). Self-Efficacy and Intrinsic Motivation Guiding Environmental Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 43(5), 658–675. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916510379759
Wamuyu, P. K. (2018). Leveraging Web 2.0 technologies to foster collective civic environmental initiatives among low-income urban communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.029
Yuriev, A., Dahmen, M., Paillé, P., Boiral, O., & Guillaumie, L. (2020). Pro-environmental behaviors through the lens of the theory of planned behavior: A scoping review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 155, 104660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104660
Zhao, G., Cavusgil, E., & Zhao, Y. (2016). A protection motivation explanation of base-of-pyramid consumers’ environmental sustainability. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.12.003
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x
Al Mamun, A., Fazal, S. A., Ahmad, G. B., Yaacob, M. R. B., & Mohamad, M. R. (2018). Willingness to pay for environmentally friendly products among low-income households along coastal peninsular Malaysia. Sustainability, 10(5), 1316. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051316
Al Mamun, A., Masud, M. M., Fazal, S. A., & Muniady, R. (2019). Green vehicle adoption behavior among low-income households: Evidence from coastal Malaysia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(26), 27305–27318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05908-2
Al Mamun, A., Mohamad, M. R., Yaacob, M. R. B., & Mohiuddin, M. (2018). Intention and behavior towards green consumption among low-income households. Journal of Environmental Management, 227(January), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.061
Al Mamun, A., Mohiuddin, M., Ahmad, G. Bin, Thurasamy, R., & Fazal, S. A. (2018). Recycling intention and behavior among low-income households. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072407
Ardoin, N., Heimlich, J., Braus, J., & Merrick, C. (2013). Influencing Conservation Action: What Research Says About Environmental Literacy, Behavior, and Conservation Results. Retrieved from https://naaee.org/eepro/resources/influencing-conservation-action-what
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought & action. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control (Seventh printing, 2003). New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Behbehani, L., & Prokopy, L. (2017). The apropriation of built heritage and pro-environmental behaviours. International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR, 11(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v11i1.1195
Boomsma, C., Jones, R. V., Pahl, S., & Fuertes, A. (2019). Do psychological factors relate to energy saving behaviours in inefficient and damp homes? A study among English social housing residents. Energy Research & Social Science, 47, 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.09.007
Chen, C., Xu, X., & Day, J. K. (2017). Thermal comfort or money saving? Exploring intentions to conserve energy among low-income households in the United States. Energy Research & Social Science, 26, 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.01.009
Chen, M.-F. (2015). Self-efficacy or collective efficacy within the cognitive theory of stress model: Which more effectively explains people’s self-reported pro-environmental behavior? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.02.002
Clayton, S., Devine-Wright, P., Swim, J., Bonnes, M., Steg, L., Whitmarsh, L., & Carrico, A. (2016). Expanding the role for psychology in addressing environmental challenges. American Psychologist, 71(3), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039482
Ding, Z., Jiang, X., Liu, Z., Long, R., Xu, Z., & Cao, Q. (2018). Factors affecting low-carbon consumption behavior of urban residents: A comprehensive review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 132, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.013
Hafner, R. J., Pahl, S., Jones, R. V., & Fuertes, A. (2020). Energy use in social housing residents in the UK and recommendations for developing energy behaviour change interventions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 251, 119643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119643
Kibert, N. C. (2018). Green justice: A holistic approach to environmental injustice. Florida State Universitu Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law, 17(1), 169–182.
Raath, S., & Hay, A. (2016). Self-efficacy: A South African case study on teachers’ commitment to integrate climate change resilience into their teaching practices. Cogent Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1264698
Russell-Bennett, R., Mulcahy, R., Little, J.-A., & Swinton, T. (2018). Money or mind? What matters most in influencing low-income earners to be energy efficient? Journal of Social Marketing, 8(1), 2–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-08-2016-0039
Samaddar, S., Chatterjee, R., Misra, B., & Tatano, H. (2014). Outcome-expectancy and self-efficacy: Reasons or results of flood preparedness intention? International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 8, 91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.02.002
Tabernero, C., & Hernández, B. (2011). Self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation guiding environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 43(5), 658–675. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916510379759
Wamuyu, P. K. (2018). Leveraging web 2.0 technologies to foster collective civic environmental initiatives among low-income urban communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.029
Zhao, G., Cavusgil, E., & Zhao, Y. (2016). A protection motivation explanation of base-of-pyramid consumers’ environmental sustainability. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.12.003
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2020 Millenium - Journal of Education, Technologies, and Health
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Los autores que sometan propuestas para esta revista estarán de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
a) Los artículos serán publicados según la licencia Licença Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0), conforme el régimen open-access, sin cualquier coste para el autor o para el lector.
b) Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y conceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación, se permite la divulgación libre del trabajo, desde que sea correctamente atribuida la autoría y la publicación inicial en esta revista.
c) Los autores están autorización para firmar contratos adicionales separadamente, para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del trabajo publicada en esta revista (ej.: publicar en un repositorio institucional o como capítulo de un libro), con reconocimiento de la autoría y publicación inicial e esta revista.
d) Los autores tienen permiso y son alentados a publicar y distribuir su trabajo on-line (ej.: en repositorios instituciones o en su página personal) ya que eso podrá generar alteraciones productivas, así como aumentar el impacto y la citación del trabajo publicado.
Documentos necesarios para la sumisión
Plantilla del artículo (formato editable)
