Propiedades psicométricas de la escala de evaluación de actitudes durante el proceso de recuperación del autocuidado

Autores/as

  • Marisa Lourenço Escola Superior de Enfermagem do Porto, Porto, Portugal | CINTESIS - Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Serviços de Saúde, Porto, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5953-788X
  • Paula Encarnação UICISA:E da Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal | Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7458-8105
  • Elisabete Silva Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3736-2112
  • Maria José Peixoto Escola Superior de Enfermagem do Porto, Porto, Portugal | CINTESIS - Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Serviços de Saúde, Porto, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4131-4279
  • Teresa Martins Escola Superior de Enfermagem do Porto, Porto, Portugal | CINTESIS - Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Serviços de Saúde, Porto, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3395-7653

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0220.28177

Palabras clave:

actitudes, validación; autocuidado; escala de evaluacion.

Resumen

Introducción: Después de un evento crítico, que dejó a la persona dependiente de las actividades de autocuidado, su proceso de recuperación está influenciado por las emociones y actitudes que adopta la persona.

Objetivos: Construir un instrumento que permita evaluar las actitudes y factores emocionales de mayor impacto en la recuperación, de una persona dependiente de actividades básicas de autocuidado.

Métodos: Estudio metodológico que tiene como objetivo describir la construcción y estudio de las propiedades métricas de la Escala de Evaluación de Actitudes durante el proceso de recuperación del autocuidado. Los datos se recogieron en un hospital y dos unidades de cuidados a largo plazo, entre octubre de 2019 y diciembre de 2020 participaron 118 personas con dependencia en actividades básicas de autocuidado.

Resultados: Una estructura de cuatro dimensiones con 37 ítems mostró adecuadas características psicométricas de validez después de un análisis factorial exploratorio. El coeficiente alfa de Cronbach varió entre 0,84 y 0,96, sugiriendo una buena consistencia interna.

Conclusión: La evaluación de los trastornos emocionales y de las actitudes de la persona, con déficit en el autocuidado, durante el proceso de recuperación, contribuye a un reconocimiento y planificación más eficaz e integrada de las necesidades de cuidado, garantizando una mayor calidad y un ajuste más personalizado. La replicabilidad y validación de esta medida en otros contextos, países y culturas, probablemente pueda contribuir a un análisis más informado de las actitudes de la persona con dependencia en las actividades básicas de autocuidado, durante el proceso de recuperación tras un evento incapacitante.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Ahn, S., Mathiason M. A., Lindquist R., & Yu, F. (2021). Factors predicting episodic memory changes in older adults with subjective cognitive decline: A longitudinal observational study. Geriatric nursing (New York, N.Y.),42(1), 268–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.08.016.

Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195.

Anthoine, E., Moret, L., Regnault, A., Sébille, V., & Hardouin, J. B. (2014). Sample size used to validate a scale: A review of publications on newly-developed patient reported outcomes measures. Health and quality of life outcomes, 12, 176. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-014-0176-2.

Backman, K., & Hentinen, M. (1999). Model for the self-care of home-dwelling elderly. Journal of advanced nursing, 30(3), 564–572. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01125.x.

Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149.

Ferreira, O. G. L., Maciel, S. C., Costa, S. M. G., Silva, A. O., & Moreira, M. A. S. P. (2012). Envelhecimento Ativo e Sua Relação Com a Independência Funcional. Texto e Contexto Enfermagem,21, 513–8.https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-07072012000300004.

Ferreira, P. C. S., Tavares, D. M. S., & Rodrigues, R. A. P. (2011). Sociodemographic characteristics, functional status and morbidity among older adults with and without cognitive decline. Acta Paulista Enfermagem, 24(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-21002011000100004.

Fraser, S.A., Kenyon, V., Lagacé, M., Wittich, W., & Southall, K. E. (2016). Stereotypes associated with age-related conditions and assistive device use in Canadian media. The Gerontologist,56(6), 1023–1032. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv094.

Greaney, A.-M., & Flaherty, S. (2020). Self-care as care left undone? The ethics of the self-care agenda in contemporary healthcare policy. Nursing Philosophy: An International Journal for Healthcare Professionals, 21(1), e12291. https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12291

Greaves, C. J.,& Campbell, J. L. (2007). Supporting self-care in general practice. The British Journal of General Practice, 57(543), 814-821.

Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (2018). Multivariate Data Analysis (8.a ed.). Cengage.

Hinkin, T. R., Tracey, J. B., & Enz, C. A. (1997). Scale construction: Developing reliable and valid measurement instruments. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 21(1), 100-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/109634809702100108

Hubbard, I., Wass, S., & Pepper, E. (2017). Stroke in Older Survivors of Ischemic Stroke: Standard Care or Something Different? Geriatrics, 2(2), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics2020018.

ICNP (2017). International Classification for Nursing Practice . https://www.icn.ch/what-we-do/projects/ehealth/icnp-browser.

Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.

Kralik D., Price K., & Telford K., (2010). The meaning of self-care for people with chronic illness. Journal of Nursing and Healthcare of Chronic Illness, 2(3),197–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-9824.2010.01056.x.

Lourenço, M. C. G. (2015). A Promoção da Autonomia da Pessoa Dependente para o Autocuidado: Modelo de Intervenção de Enfermagem em Cuidados Continuados. [DoctoralThesis]. https://repositorio.ucp.pt/handle/10400.14/20685

Meleis, A. I., Sawyer, L. M., Im, E. O., Hilfinger Messias, D. K., & Schumacher, K. (2000). Experiencing transitions: An emerging middle-range theory. ANS. Advances in Nursing Science, 23(1), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-200009000-00006.

Meleis, A. I., 2010. Transitions theory: middle-range and situation-specific theories in nursing research and practice. Springer Publishing Company.

Moilanen, T., Kangasniemi, M., Papinaho, O., Mynttinen, M., Siipi, H., Suominen, S., & Suhonen, R. (2021). Older people’s perceived autonomy in residential care: An integrative review. Nursing Ethics, 28(3), 414–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733020948115

Moorhead, S., Johnson, M., Maas, M. L., & Swanson, E. (2013). Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) (5.a ed.). Mosby.

Parente, P., Costa, A., Pereira, S., Machado, P., Martins, T., Pereira, F., & Silva, A. (2022). Self-Care Dependency Evaluation Form: Psychometric properties of the revised version with 27 items. Scandinavian journal of caring sciences,36(1), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12966.

Pestana, M. H., & Gagueiro, J. N.(2014). Análise de Dados para Ciências Sociais, a Complementaridade do SPSS (6.a ed.). Edições Sílabo.

Pryor, J. (2009). Coaching patients to self-care: A primary responsibility of nursing. International Journal of Older People Nursing, 4(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-3743.2008.00148.x

Riegel, B., Dunbar, S. B., Fitzsimons, D., Freedland, K. E., Lee, C. S., Middleton, S., Stromberg, A., Vellone, E., Webber, D. E., & Jaarsma, T. (2019). Self-care research: Where are we now? Where are we going? International Journal of Nursing Studies, 116, 103402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103402.

Schemitsch, C., & Nauth, A. (2020). Psychological factors and recovery from trauma. Injury, 51 Suppl 2, S64–S66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2019.10.081

Silva, E. S. A. (2020). A pessoa dependente no autocuidado com potencial para melhorar: Construção de um instrumento de avaliação [MasterThesis]. https://comum.rcaap.pt/handle/10400.26/31954

Committee on the Learning Health Care System in America & Institute of Medicine. (2013). Best Care at Lower Cost: The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America (M. Smith, R. Saunders, L. Stuckhardt, & J. M. McGinnis, Eds.). National Academies Press (US). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK207225/

Tsang, S., Royse, C. F., & Terkawi, A. S. (2017). Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia, 11(Suppl 1), S80–S89. https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17

Webber, D., Guo, Z., & Mann, S. (2013) Self-care in health: we can define it, but should we also measure it? Selfcare Journal, 4, 101–6.

Whitson, H. E., Duan-Porter, W., Schmader, K. E., Morey, M. C., Cohen, H. J., & Colón-Emeric, C. S. (2016). Physical Resilience in Older Adults: Systematic Review and Development of an Emerging Construct. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 71(4), 489–495. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glv202

World Health Organization (WHO). Regional Office for South-East Asia. (‎2009)‎. Self-care in the context of primary health care. WHO Regional Office for South-East Asia. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/206352.

Descargas

Publicado

2023-03-28

Cómo citar

Lourenço, M., Encarnação, P., Silva, E., Peixoto, M. J. ., & Martins, T. (2023). Propiedades psicométricas de la escala de evaluación de actitudes durante el proceso de recuperación del autocuidado. Millenium - Journal of Education, Technologies, and Health, 2(21), e28177. https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0220.28177

Número

Sección

Ciencias de la Vida y de la Salud