BREAKS IN THE CONTINUITY OF THE PUBLIC SPACE:
CASE OF LA ESKALERA KARAKOLA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18055/Finis34806Abstract
The founding conditions of the public (de)limits its scope of action and interpellation. Over time, numerous groups have problematized this framework and have tried to reformulate their insertion into it through collective actions. To explore its inconsistencies, alternatives and vanishing points, the gender vector is taken. After describing the public regime, the research moves to the public space, which, as a territorialized extension of the public realm, presents in its classic conception the same limitations as the public. In an attempt to go beyond that institutional public space, groups and social movements have created their own spaces, as loudspeakers and places to make themselves visible. The article focuses on how Social Centers, as spatial and infrastructural experiments, reinvent the public encounter by producing a public space. To do this, it delves into the dissidence practiced by the feminist project La Eskalera Karakola and the challenge they launch against the current public space and the insertion of women in that public space and, therefore, in the public realm. In short, the article launches a reflection that contributes to the debate on public space and its possible multiple meanings.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Finisterra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
-
Authors are responsible for the opinions expressed in the texts submitted to Finisterra.
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
-
Authors must commit to complying with the “Guidelines for article submission”, on the RCAAP platform.
-
Whenever a text may require amendments based on suggestions made by the Scientific Reviewers and/or the Executive Committee, authors must agree to accept these suggestions and implement the requested changes. If authors disagree with any of the amendments suggested, they will need to provide justifications for each individual case.
-
Reproduction of materials liable to copyright laws has been granted permission in advance.
-
Texts are original, unpublished and have not been submitted to other journals.
License URL CC Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (BY-NC-ND)