Biohacking & transhumanism, mapping emerging discourses: a bibliometric review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0223.34408Keywords:
ethic; transhumanism; biohacking; bibliometric indicators; cognitive evolutionAbstract
Introduction: Biohacking's emergence has reshaped scientific research, especially within transhumanism and biological manipulation. Evaluating its impact on the scientific community is crucial for defining future research directions and communication in this field.
Objective: To critically examine perspectives, approaches, and debates in academic literature to develop a comprehensive understanding of the ethical, social, and cultural implications of technological advancement within the transhumanist context.
Methods: SCOPUS and bibliometric analysis were employed to quantify biohacking's influence. Social Network Analysis identified key themes and research focus areas.
Results: North American and European countries led in scientific productivity. Published articles and citation impact showed a moderate to low index. Social Network Analysis highlighted ethical considerations, social implications, and an emerging discourse on cognitive evolution.
Conclusion: The results highlight the need for comprehensive education and communication strategies to ensure that the public is well-informed about the risks, benefits, and ethical considerations associated with genetic modification technologies. Therefore, more research on legislation and regulations is required.
Downloads
References
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Birch, K. (2008). Neoliberalising Bioethics: Bias, Enhancement and Economistic Ethics. Genomics, Society and Policy, 4(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-5354-4-2-1
Boss, J. A. (2022). Punks and profiteers in the war on death. Body and Religion, 5(2), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1558/bar.18251
Bour, S. (2019). Transhumanisme: Entre Augmentation, Esthétique Et Éthique. Philosophical Readings, 11(1), 6-16.
Brickley, L. (2019). Bodies without Borders: The Sinews and Circuitry of “folklore+.” Western Folklore, 78(1), 5–38. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26864140
Bugajska, A. (2022). The posthuman: Around the vanishing point of utopia. In B. Van Klink, M. Soniewicka, & L. Van Den Broeke (Eds.), Utopian Thinking in Law, Politics, Architecture and Technology (pp. 267-284). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803921402.00022
Castillo, P. (2023). Desafíos del transhumanismo en la educación del siglo XXI: El alma de la democracia contra las cuerdas. Revista Complutense de Educación, 34(2), 347-356. https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.79309
Colado García, S. (2020). El Arriesgado Camino de la Evolución Tecnológica. Medicina Naturista, 14(1), 18-21.
Conde, F. (2019). Apuntes sobre el análisis y la interpretación de los “emergentes discursivos” en el análisis sociológico de los discursos. Encrucijadas Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociales, 17. https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/encrucijadas/article/view/79196
Cong, L., Ran, F. A., Cox, D., Lin, S., Barretto, R., Habib, N., Hsu, P. D., Wu, X., Jiang, W.,Marraffini, L. A., & Zhang, F. (2013). Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems. Science, 339(6121), 819-823. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1231143
Cozza, M., Ellison, K. L., & Katz, S. (2022). Hacking age. Sociology Compass, 16(10), e13034. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13034
Doerksen, M. D. (2017). Electromagnetism and the Nth sense: augmenting senses in the grinder subculture. The Senses and Society, 12(3), 344-349. https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2017.1367487
Gaspar, R., Rohde, P., & Giger, J. (2019). Unconventional settings and uses of human enhancement technologies: A non‐systematic review of public and experts’ views on self‐enhancement and DIY biology/biohacking risks. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(4), 295-305. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.175
Gauttier, S. (2019). Enhancing Oneself with an Exosense: Learning from Users’ Experiences. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1, 317-340. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.174
Gorgoni, G. (2018). Responsible Research and Innovation and the Governance of Human Enhancement. Nanoethics, 12, 257-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-018-0326-9
Heyes, C. (2020). Psychological Mechanisms Forged by Cultural Evolution. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(4), 399-404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420917736
Isa, N. M., & Shuri, M. (2017). Ethical Concerns About Human Genetic Enhancement in the Malay Science Fiction Novels. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24, 109-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9887-1
Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2012). A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity. Science, 337(6096), 816-821. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225829
Kyslan, P. (2019). Transhumanism and the issue of death. Ethics & Bioethics, 9(1-2), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.2478/ebce-2019-0011
Le Dévédec, N., & Collin, J. (2018). Le médicament augmenté: L’usage du médicament dans les discours transhumanistes et ses significations sociales. Journal international de bioéthique et d’éthique des sciences, 29(3), 93. https://doi.org/10.3917/jibes.293.0093
Lima, V. (2023). EXPRESS: Biohacking COVID-19: Sharing Is Not Always Caring. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 42(4), 326-342. https://doi.org/10.1177/07439156231183001
Lotem, A., Halpern, J. Y., Edelman, S., & Kolodny, O. (2017). The evolution of cognitive mechanisms in response to cultural innovations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(30), 7915-7922. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1620742114
Mali, P., Yang, L., Esvelt, K. M., Aach, J., Guell, M., DiCarlo, J. E., Norville, J. E., & Church, G. M. (2013). RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9. Science, 339(6121), 823-826. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1232033
Mercer, C., & Trothen, T. J. (2021). Religion and the Technological Future: An Introduction to Biohacking, Artificial Intelligence, and Transhumanism. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62359-3
Miller, S. E., Legan, A. W., Henshaw, M. T., Ostevik, K. L., Samuk, K., Uy, F. M. K., & Sheehan, M. J. (2020). Evolutionary dynamics of recent selection on cognitive abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(6), 3045-3052. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1918592117
Nayga, R. M., Woodward, R., & Aiew, W. (2006). Willingness to Pay for Reduced Risk of Foodborne Illness: A Nonhypothetical Field Experiment. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne d’agroeconomie, 54(4), 461-475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2006.00061.x
Noorulain Hyder, Muhammad Liaquat Raza, & Azfar Athar Ishaqui. (2017). Transhumanism: The Epitome of Doom and Gloom. Annals of Abbasi Shaheed Hospital and Karachi Medical & Dental College, 22(2), 133-137. https://doi.org/10.58397/ashkmdc.v22i2.113
Peterson, L., Mende, M., & Scott, M. L. (2022). From Self‐quantification to Self‐objectification? Framework and Research Agenda on Consequences for Well‐being. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 56(3), 1356-1374.https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12478
Pisarski. (2021). Prometheus the Biohacker? Mythical Grammar in the Discourse of Bioscience After the CRISPR Revolution. In The Blurring of Boundaries in Bioscientific Discourse (119-138). Logos Verlag.
Prada, M., Rohde, P., & Giger, J.-C. (2019). Unconventional Settings and Uses of Human Enhancement Technologies: A Non‐systematic Review of Public and Experts’ Views on Self‐enhancement and DIY Biology/Biohacking Risks. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1, 295-305. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.175
Rifai, E. (2022). Whose Techno‐utopia? Power, Privilege, and the Religio‐secular Frameworks of the Contemporary Biohacking Movement. Religion Compass, 16(11-12), e12451. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec3.12451
Roduit, J. A. R., Heilinger, J.-C., & Baumann, H. (2015). Ideas of Perfection and the Ethics of Human Enhancement. Bioethics, 29(9), 622-630. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12192
Rosoff, P. M. (2011). I’ll Be a Monkey’s Uncle: A Moral Challenge to Human Genetic Enhancement Research. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(10), 611-615. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.042226
Rozumko, A. (2023). Constructing Knowledge at the Intersection of Disciplines: Appraisal in Knowledge Claims Concerning Animals in Posthumanist Discourse. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis, 140(1), 49-65. https://doi.org/10.4467/20834624sl.23.003.17263
Schmidt, M. (2010). Xenobiology: A New Form of Life as the Ultimate Biosafety Tool. Bioessays, 32(4),322-331. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.200900147
Spink, A., & Cole, C. (2007). Information Behavior: A Socio-Cognitive Ability. Evolutionary Psychology, 5(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490700500201
Triki, Z., Fong, S., Amcoff, M., & Kolm, N. (2022). Artificial mosaic brain evolution of relative telencephalon size improves inhibitory control abilities in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution, 76(1), 128-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14405
Yetisen, A. K. (2018). Biohacking. Trends in Biotechnology, 36(8), 744-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.02.011
Zabala Leal, T. D. (2021). La ética en inteligencia artificial desde la perspectiva del derecho. Via Inveniendi Et Iudicandi, 16(2), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.15332/19090528.6785
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Millenium - Journal of Education, Technologies, and Health
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit proposals for this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Articles are published under the Licença Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0), in full open-access, without any cost or fees of any kind to the author or the reader;
b) The authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, allowing the free sharing of work, provided it is correctly attributed the authorship and initial publication in this journal;
c) The authors are permitted to take on additional contracts separately for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, post it to an institutional repository or as a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal;
d) Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg, in institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and citation of published work
Documents required for submission
Article template (Editable format)
