If the circular economy isn’t circulating, let’s move beyond the narrative
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0218e.41263Abstract
For years, the circular economy has been portrayed as the perfect solution to sustainability issues: a system capable of reducing waste, cutting emissions, and ensuring economic growth without depleting the planet (EMF, 2013; 2015). A kind of magic potion that could transform waste into resources and generate an endless virtuous cycle. But the reality is quite different: today, the circular economy is not circulating enough.
The numbers speak for themselves. The Circularity Gap Report (2024) shows that the global circularity rate has dropped from 9.1% in 2018 to 7.2% in 2023. In other words, the world is becoming less and less able to reuse materials to create new resources. Not only that: over the past six years, the global economy has consumed 582 billion tons of materials, almost as much as was used throughout the entire 20th century. The current production system is pushing ecosystems beyond their limits while the Earth's biocapacity is increasingly shrinking (Siegel, 2021).
According to the Circular Economy Report in Italy (2024), the country is a European leader in investments and employment in the sector. With €12.4 billion invested in 2021 and over 613,000 workers, Italy is among the most advanced nations. However, when it comes to concrete results, challenges emerge: Italy's recycling rate remains at 33.8%, well below the EU average of 46.2% and far from the 65% target.
European and national policies are trying to reverse the trend (EU, 2018; 2021). The EU Green Deal and new regulations on packaging, critical raw materials, and waste management are important steps, but they are not enough. The issue runs deeper and requires structural changes. The Circularity Gap Report 2024 highlights that bridging this gap requires bold policies, financial reforms that penalize unsustainable products, and investments in skills for the ecological transition.
However, as demonstrated by Kirchherr (2017), who analyzed 114 different definitions of the circular economy, the concept itself remains ambiguous and qualitative, making its actual measurement difficult. Current indicators, including those developed by the European Commission (Moraga et al., 2019), are still unable to fully assess the circularity of a system, leading to differing conclusions depending on the metrics adopted (Spina et al., 2025). This methodological gap further complicates the adoption of effective strategies.
Downloads
References
Borrello, M., Caracciolo, F., Lombardi, A., Pascucci, S., & Cembalo, L. (2017). Consumers’ perspective on circular economy strategy for reducing food waste. Sustainability, 9(1), 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010141
De Man, R., & Friege, H. (2016). Circular economy: European policy on shaky ground. Waste Management & Research, 34(2), 93-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242x15626015
EMF (Ellen MacArthur Foundation), & SUN. (2015). Growth within: A circular economy vision for a competitive Europe. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/Circular%20economy%203.pdf
EMF (Ellen MacArthur Foundation). (2013). Towards the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(1), 23-44.https://www.aquafil.com/assets/uploads/ellen-macarthur-foundation.pdf
European Commission. (2018). A clean planet for all. A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy. COM 773.
European Commission. (2021). The European Green Deal: Striving to Be the First Climate-Neutral Continent. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en
Fund, S. (2015). Sustainable development goals. https://www. un. org/sustainabledevelopment/inequality.
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
Cembalo, L., Borrello, M., De Luca, A. I., Giannoccaro, G., & D'Amico, M. (2020). Transitioning agri-food systems into circular economy trajectories. Aestimum, 199-218. https://doi.org/10.13128/aestim-8860
De Jesus, A., & Mendonça, S. (2018). Lost in transition? Drivers and barriers in the eco-innovation road to the circular economy. Ecological economics, 145, 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.001
FAO (2020) Legislative Approaches to Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resources Governance. FAO Legislative Study, 114 at 93. https://www.unenvironment.org/resources/publication/legislative-approaches-sustainableagriculture-and-natural-resources
Fraser, M., Conde, Á., & Haigh, L. (2024). Circularity Gap Report 2024. Circle Economy.
Kirchherr, J., Piscicelli, L., Bour, R., Kostense-Smit, E., Muller, J., Huibrechtse-Truijens, A., & Hekkert, M. (2018). Barriers to the circular economy: Evidence from the European Union (EU). Ecological economics, 150, 264-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028
Modica, G., Pulvirenti, A., Spina, D., Bracco, S., D'Amico, M., & Di Vita, G. (2024). Clustering olive oil mills through a spatial and economic GIS-based approach. Cleaner Environmental Systems, 14, 100207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100207
Moraga, G., Huysveld, S., Mathieux, F., Blengini, G. A., Alaerts, L., Van Acker, K., de Meester, S., & Dewulf, J. (2019). Circular economy indicators: What do they measure? Resources, Conservation, and Recycling, 146, 452–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.045
Network, C. E. (2024). Rapporto sull’economia circolare in Italia 2024. https://circulareconomynetwork.it/rapporto-sulleconomia-circolare-in-italia-2024/
OECD. (2024). Development Co-operation report 2024: tackling poverty and Inequalities through the green transition. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/357b63f7-en
Raimondo, M., Spina, D., Hamam, M., D'Amico, M., & Caracciolo, F. (2024). Intrinsic motivation strongly affects the readiness toward circular food consumption: evidence from the motivation–opportunity–ability model. British Food Journal, 126(2), 715-737. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-09-2022-0800
Siegel, F. R. (2021). The Earth’s human carrying capacity: limitations assessed, solutions proposed. Springer Nature.
Spina, D., Carbone, R., Pulvirenti, A., Rizzo, M., D’Amico, M., & Di Vita, G. (2024). What Gets Measured Gets Managed-Circular Economy Indicators for the Valorization of By-Products in the Olive Oil Supply Chain: A Systematic Review. Agronomy, 14(12), 2879. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14122879
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Millenium - Journal of Education, Technologies, and Health

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit proposals for this journal agree to the following terms:
a) Articles are published under the Licença Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0), in full open-access, without any cost or fees of any kind to the author or the reader;
b) The authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, allowing the free sharing of work, provided it is correctly attributed the authorship and initial publication in this journal;
c) The authors are permitted to take on additional contracts separately for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, post it to an institutional repository or as a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal;
d) Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg, in institutional repositories or on their website) as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and citation of published work
Documents required for submission
Article template (Editable format)

