Estudantes de doutoramento no seu caminho para a investigação multi e interdisciplinar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0212.3.00314Palavras-chave:
multi - and transdisciplinarity, research, university course, individual and collective learning, value creationResumo
Introdução: Atualmente são necessárias abordagens interdisciplinares para responder aos desafios técnicos e socioculturais mais críticos e complexos de partilha de conhecimento no mundo. Este artigo pretende analisar um curso de doutoramento que ocorreu na Universidade de Uppsala no outono de 2018.
Objetivos: O objetivo deste estudo é descrever o processo de aprendizagem conjunta de estudantes de doutoramento no seu caminho de exploração de pesquisas multi e interdisciplinares.
Métodos: Recorrem-se a uma abordagem qualitativa tendo sido utilizadas como fontes empíricas estudos de literatura, pesquisas, observações, discussões em grupos focais, entrevistas e avaliações de cursos com os alunos, para além de documentação sobre o desenho do curso.
Resultados: O principal resultado do estudo foi o facto do curso ter dado aos alunos a possibilidade de aprofundar a sua compreensão sobre as barreiras e os benefícios da pesquisa multi e transdisciplinar através da interação e discussão com colegas e professores de diferentes disciplinas.
Conclusões: Sugere-se neste estudo que a multi e a interdisciplinaridade e até a undisciplinarity podem ser a forma de cooperar entre as disciplinas, aprendendo coletivamente e criando valor para os pesquisadores na solução de grandes problemas, na criação de algo novo e inovador, encontrando soluções e desenvolvimento futuro para o mundo. A tarefa dos educadores e agentes de aprendizagem, bem como dos formuladores de políticas é facilitar sistemas participativos e sistémicos de aprendizagem crítica e situações em que essas condições possam ser realizadas.
Downloads
Referências
Andreotti, V.; Stein, S., Sutherland, A., Pashby, K., Suša, R., & Amsler, S., (2018). Mobilising different conversations about Global Justice in Education: Toward alternative futures in uncertain times. Policy & Practice: A Development Education Review, Issue, 6, 9-41.
Aram, J.D., (2004). Concepts of interdisciplinarity: configurations of knowledge and action. Human Relations, 57 (4), 379–412.
Berger, G. G., (1972). Opinions and facts. In L. Apostel, G. Berger, A. Briggs, and G. Michaud (Eds.), Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities (pp. 21–74). Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Bourke, P., Butler, L., (1998). Institutions and the map of science: matching university departments and fields of research. Research Policy, 26, 711–718.
Celaschi, F., Formia, E., & Lupo (2013) From trans-disciplinary to undisciplined design l earning: Educating through/to disruption. Strategic Design Research Journal, 6(1), 1.
Dixon, N. (1994). The Organizational Learning Cycle: How We Can Learn Collectively (1 edition). London: McGraw-Hill.
Doctoral Student Forum, DSF, (2019) Uppsla university. Retrieved from: athttp://www.uppsalaforum.uu.se/phd-forum/members-of-the-doctoral-student forum-
Dorpat, T.L. and Miller, M.L. (1992) Clinical interaction and the analysis of meaning: a new psychoanalytic theory. Hillsdale, N.J.: Analytic Press.
Elsevier, (2015). A Review of the UK’s Interdisciplinary Research Using a Citation-based Approach: Report to the UK HE Funding Bodies and MRC by Elsevier. Retrieved from: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/HEFCE,2014/ Content/Pubs/Independentresearch/2015/Review, of,the, UKs, interdisciplinary research/2015_interdisc.pdf.
Frs, H., (1962). Institutional means of collaboration between the social sciences. Social Science Information 1, 5–22.
Gillies, J, Neimeyer, R.A., & Milman, E. ( 2014) The Meaning of Loss Codebook: Construction of a System for Analyzing Meanings Made in Bereavement. Death Studies, 38, 207– 216, 10.1080/07481187.2013.829367.
Good, G.A., (2000). The assembly of geophysics: scientific disciplines as frameworks of consensus. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 31 (3), 259–292.
Granberg, O., and Ohlsson, J. (Eds.). (2016). Kollektivt lärande i arbetslivet. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Griffin, G., (2006). Balancing agendas: social sciences and humanities in Europe. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 5, 229–241.
Hall, E.F.and Sanders, T. (2015) Accountability and the academy: producing knowledge about human dimensions of climate change. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 21(2), 438-61. Doi: 10.1111/1467-9655.12162.hdl:1807/98882.
Haider J.M., Hentati-Sundberg, J.; Giusti, M., Goodness, J., Hamann, M., Masterson,V.A., Meacham, M., Merrie, A., Ospina, D., Schill, C., & Sinare, H. (2018) The undisciplinary journey: early-career perspectives in sustainability science. Sustainability Science. ISSN: 1862-4065 (Print) 1862-4057 (Online) Volume 13, (1), 191–204. doi: 10.1007/s11625-017-0445-1 Springer.
Hernes, T. and Maitlis, S. (2013). Process, sensemaking, and organizing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hicks, D.M. and Katz, J.S., (1996). Where is science going? Science Technology and Human Values, 21 (4), 379–406.
Howells, J.R., James, A.J., & Malik, K. (2003). The sourcing of technological knowledge: Distributed innovation processes and dynamic change. R & D Management, 33(4), 395 – 409. doi: 10.1111/1467-9310.00306
Hukkinen, J., (2003). From groundless universalism to grounded generalism: improving ecological economic indicators of human-environmental interaction. Ecological Economics, 44, 11–17.
Ingelzi, M. (2000) Meaning-Making in the Learning and Teaching Process. In M.B. Baxter Magolda (Ed) New directions for teaching and learning. no. 82, pp. 5–14. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., and Holubec, E. J. (2008). Cooperation in the Classroom Revised edition (Eighth edition). Edina, Minn: Interaction Book Co.
Kates R.W., Clark, W.C., Corell, R., Hall, J.M., Jaeger, C.C., Lowe, I., McCarthy, J.J., Schellnhuber, H. J., Bolin, B., Dickson, N.M., Faucheux, S., Gallopin, G.C., Grubler, A., Huntley, B., Jaeger, J., Jodha, N.S., Kasperson, R.E., Mabogunje, A., Matson, P., Mooney, H., Moore, B. III, O’Riordan, T.,& Svedin, U. (2001) Sustainability Science, 292, (5517):641–642. doi:10.1126/science.1059386.
Klein, J.T., (1996). Crossing Boundaries. Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities. Carlottesville and London, University Press of Virginia.
Komiyama, H., and Takeuchi, K. (2006) Sustainability science: building a new discipline. Sustainability Science, 1(1),1–6. doi:10.1007/s11625-006- 0007-4
Leach, M., Scoones, I., & Stirling, A. (2010) Dynamic sustainabilities: technology, environment, social justice. London, Earthscan.
Kuhn, T. (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
Lattuca, L. R., (2001). Creating interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary research and teach- ing among college and university faculty. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
Lau, L., Pasquini, M. (2008). ‘Jack of all trades’? The negotiation of interdisciplinarity within geography. Geoforum, 39, 552– 560.
Latour, B., (1998). From the world of science to the world of research? Science, 280 (5361), 208–209.
Lessard, C. (2007). Complexity and reflexivity: two important issues for economic evaluation in health care. Social Science & Medicine, 64 (8), 1754–1765.
Lundgren, U., Säljö, R., and Liberg, C. (2014). Lärande, skola, bildning: grundbok för lärare. Stockholm: Natur & kultur.
Marshall, J. & Bleecker, J. (2010). Undisciplinarity. in P. Rodgers & M. Smyth (Eds.). Digital Blur: Creative Practice at the Boundaries of Architecture, Design and Art. (pp216–223). Oxon: Libri Publishers.
McLeish, T. and Strang, V., (2014) 'Leading interdisciplinary research: transforming the academic landscape. Stimulus paper. Leadership Foundation for Higher Education, London. Durham University. Retrieved from: http://www.lfhe.ac.uk/en/research-resources/research-hub/2014-research/leading-interdisciplinary-research-transforming-the-academic-landscape-.cfm.
Minsky, M. (1988). The Society of Mind (Pages Bent edition). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Ohlsson J., (1996), Collective learning: learning in working within childcare, Report/semi- nar on environmental education and knowledge, Stockholm: Stockholm University, Pedagogiska institutionen.
Petts, J., Owens, S., and Bulkeley, H., (2008). Crossing boundaries: interdisciplinarity in the context of urban environments. Geoforum 39, (2), 593–601.
Porter, A.L., Rossini, F.A., (1985). Peer review of interdisciplinary research proposals. Science, T echnology and Human Values, 10 (3), 33–38.
Ramadier, T., (2004). Transdisciplinarity and its challenges: the case of urban studies. Futures, 36 (4), 423.
Robinson, J. (2008) Being undisciplined: transgressions and intersections in academia and beyond. Futures, 40(1):70–86. doi:10.1016/ j.futures.2007.06.007
Roser,T, De Fillippi, R., & Samson, A. (2013) "Managing your co‐creation mix: co‐creation ventures in distinctive contexts", European Business Review, 25 (1), 20-41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09555341311287727
Sanchez,R., and Heene, A., (1997) Competence-based strategic management. Wiley, Strategic management series.San Fransisco. University of California.
Slaughter, S., and Leslie, L. L., (1997). Academic Capitalism. Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University.Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN: 9780801862588. Baltimore, Maryland.
Stember, M. (1991). “Advancing the Social Sciences Through the Interdisciplinary Enterprise.” The Social Science Journal, 28 (1), 1–14.
Stock, P., and Burton R.J., (2011) Defining terms for integrated (multi-inter- trans-disciplinary) sustainability research. Sustainability, 3(8), 1090–1113. doi: 10.3390/su3081090.
Tress, G., Tress, B., & Fry, G., (2006). Publishing integrative landscape research: analysis of editorial policies of peer-reviewed journals. Environmental Science & Policy, 9 (5), 466.
Turpin, T., and Garrett-Jones, S., (2000). Mapping the new cultures and organization of research in Australia. In: Weingart, P., Stehr, N. (Eds.), Practicing Interdisciplinarity. Toronto, CA. University of Toronto Press.
United Nations, (2015). Global Sustainable Development Report, 2015 Edition: Advance Unedited Version. Accessed January 2017. Retrieved from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1758GSDR%202015%20A dvance%20Unedited% 20Version.pdf.
Uppsala University objective and stategies, UFV, 2013/110, Uppsala University.
Vatn, A., (2005). Institutions and the Environment. Cheltenham, UK. Edward Elgar Publishing,
Vincenti, V.B., (2005). Family and consumer sciences university faculty perceptions of interdisciplinary work. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal 34, (1), 80–103.
Walter AI, Helgenberger S, Wiek A, & Scholz RW (2007) Measuring societal effects of transdisciplinary research projects: design and application of an evaluation method. Eval Program Plan, 30(4), 325–338. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.08.002
Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in Organisations. London: Sage.
Weick, K., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.
Weingart, P., (2000). Interdisciplinarity: the paradoxical discourse. In: Weingart, P., Stehr, N. (Eds.), Practicing Interdisciplinarity. Toronto, CA. University of Toronto Press.
Wilhelmson L., (1998), Lärande dialog. Samtalsmönster, perspektivförändring och lärande i gruppsamtal, Stockholm. Stockholm University.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2020 Millenium - Journal of Education, Technologies, and Health
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0.
Os autores que submetem propostas para esta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
a) Os artigos são publicados segundo a licença Licença Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0), conformando regime open-access, sem qualquer custo para o autor ou para o leitor;
b) Os autores conservam os direitos de autor e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, permitindo-se a partilha livre do trabalho, desde que seja corretamente atribuída a autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
c) Os autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
d) Os autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir o seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publica
Documentos necessários à submissão
Template do artigo (formato editável)
