Visual Outcomes in Children with Craniosynostosis: Experience from a National Tertiary Referral Center
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48560/rspo.43662Keywords:
Child, Craniosynostoses/complications, Craniosynostoses/surgery, Vision Disorders/etiology Visual AcuityAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Craniosynostosis is a rare craniofacial disorder frequently associated with ophthalmologic morbidity. The impact of cranial surgery timing on visual outcomes remains controversial. This study evaluated ophthalmologic outcomes in children with craniosynostosis treated at a national tertiary referral center in Portugal, focusing on the influence of surgical timing and syndromic status on visual function.
METHODS: A retrospective study included all children with genetically or clinically confirmed craniosynostosis assessed by ophthalmology and neurosurgery departments between January 2014 and August 2025. Demographic, genetic, surgical and ophthalmic data were collected. Patients were categorized by surgical timing: early (≤ 6 months) or late surgery (>6 months). Logistic regression models assessed associations between surgical timing, syndromic status and visual outcomes.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were included (76% syndromic). Multiple-suture involvement occurred in 21 (57%), with the coronal suture most frequently affected (41%). Median age at the first neurosurgery was 7.0 months (IQR 4.0-16.5). Genetically confirmed syndromic craniosynostosis was present in 27 patients (73%), most commonly Crouzon (n=9), Muenke (n=5), Apert (n=4) and Pfeiffer (n=3). Nineteen distinct pathogenic variants were identified, predominantly in the FGFR2 gene (n=7) and FGFR3 (n=5), with novel variants in GLI3 and EFNB1.
Late surgery was associated with higher odds of amblyopia (OR=2.75; 95% CI:0.50-14.99; p=0.243). Syndromic craniosynostosis independently conferred a ten-fold increased risk of strabismus (OR=10.23; 95% CI: 1.61-64.8; p=0.014) and a greater risk of amblyopia (OR=3.46; 95% CI: 0.35-34.42; p=0.289). Multiple-suture involvement displayed a trend toward optic atrophy (OR=3.57; p=0.23). At baseline, 38.5% had amblyopia, 66.7% strabismus and 81.1% papilledema. At final follow-up (mean 6.5 years), amblyopia persisted in 28.6%, strabismus in 78.4%, and optic atrophy developed in 21.6%; papilledema resolved in all.
CONCLUSION: This first Portuguese cohort integrating clinical, surgical and genetic data underscores the significant visual morbidity of craniosynostosis. Syndromic status emerged as the main determinant of adverse ophthalmologic outcomes, while earlier cranial surgery showed a potentially protective effect on visual development. The identification of novel pathogenic variants expands the molecular spectrum of craniosynostosis. Early referral, comprehensive genetic evaluation and long-term ophthalmologic surveillance remain crucial to preserve vision in this vulnerable population.
Downloads
References
Rostamzad P, Arslan Z, Mathijssen I, Koudstaal MJ, Pleumeekers MM, Versnel SL, et al. Prevalence of ocular anomalies in craniosynostosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J
Shlobin NA, Baticulon RE, Ortega CA, Du L, Bonfield CM, Wray A, et al. Global epidemiology of craniosynostosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2022;164:413-23.e3. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2022.05.093
Governale LS. Craniosynostosis. Pediatric Neurol. 2015;53:394-401. doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2015.07.006
Lattanzi W, Barba M, Di Pietro L, Boyadjiev SA. Genetic advances in craniosynostosis. Am J Med Genet A. 2017;173:1406-29. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.38159
Boyadjiev S, for the International Craniosynostosis Consortium. Genetic analysis of non-syndromic craniosynostosis. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2007;10:129-37. doi:10.1111/j.1601-6343.2007.00393.x
Cornelissen M, Ottelaender BD, Rizopoulos D, van der Hulst R, Mink van der Molen A, van der Horst C, et al. Increase of prevalence of craniosynostosis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016;44:1273-9. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2016.07.007
Dolk H, Loane M, Garne E. The Prevalence of Congenital Anomalies in Europe. In: Posada De La Paz M, Groft SC, editors. Rare Diseases Epidemiology. Vol 686. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. Amsterdam: Springer; 2010. p.349-364.
Duan M, Skoch J, Pan BS, Shah V. Neuro-ophthalmological manifestations of craniosynostosis: current perspectives. Eye Brain. 2021;13:29-40. doi:10.2147/EB.S234075
Khan SH. Visual outcomes and amblyogenic risk factors in craniosynostotic syndromes: a review of 141 cases. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87:999-1003. doi:10.1136/bjo.87.8.999
Denis D, Genitori L, Bolufer A, Lena G, Saracco JB, Choux M. Refractive error and ocular motility in plagiocephaly. Childs Nerv Syst. 1994;10:210-6. doi:10.1007/BF00301156
MacKinnon S, Proctor MR, Rogers GF, Meara JG, Whitecross S, Dagi LR. Improving ophthalmic outcomes in children with unilateral coronal synostosis by treatment with endoscopic strip craniectomy and helmet therapy rather than fronto-orbital advancement. J AAPOS. 2013;17:259-265. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2013.01.009
Lo LJ, Marsh JL, Kane AA, Vannier MW. Orbital dysmorphology in unilateral coronal synostosis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996;33:190-197. doi:10.1597/1545-1569_1996_033_0190_odiucs_2.3.00_2
MacKinnon S, Rogers GF, Gregas M, Proctor MR, Mulliken JB, Dagi LR. Treatment of unilateral coronal synostosis by endoscopic strip craniectomy or fronto-orbital advancement: Ophthalmic findings. J AAPOS. 2009;13:155-60. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.10.011
Bennett KG, Vick AD, Ettinger RE, Archer SM, Vercler CJ, Buchman SR. Age at craniosynostosis surgery and its impact on ophthalmologic diagnoses: a single-center retrospective review. Plastic Reconstr Surg. 2019;144:696-701. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000005915
National Center for Biotechnology Information. ClinVar. [accessed Jan 2025] Available at: https://www.clinicalgenome.org/data-sharing/clinvar/
Cruz OA, Repka MX, Hercinovic A, Cotter SA, Lambert SR, Hutchinson AK, et al. Amblyopia preferred practice pattern. Ophthalmology. 2023;130:P136-P178. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.11.003
Clarke CM, Fok VT, Gustafson JA, Smyth MD, Timms AE, Frazar CD, et al. Single suture craniosynostosis: Identification of rare variants in genes associated with syndromic forms. Am J Med Genet A. 2018;176:290-300. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.38540
Painter SL, Wadlow L, Kasbekar S, Rodrigues D, Wielogorska N, Abbott J. Visual outcomes of children with craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2025;36:587-90. doi:10.1097/SCS.00000000000010806
Vasco G, Baranello G, Ricci D, Salerni A, Tamburrini G, Amante R, et al. Longitudinal assessment of visual development in non-syndromic craniosynostosis: a 1-year pre- and post-surgical study. Arch Dis Childhood. 2008;93:932-5. doi:10.1136/adc.2007.128421
Touzé R, Bremond-Gignac D, Robert MP. Ophthalmological management in craniosynostosis. Neurochirurgie. 2019;65:310-7. doi:10.1016/j.neuchi.2019.09.016
Samra F, Paliga JT, Tahiri Y, Whitaker LA, Bartlett SP, Forbes BJ, et al. The prevalence of strabismus in unilateral coronal synostosis. Childs Nerv Syst. 2015;31:589-96. doi:10.1007/s00381-014-2580-7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Revista Sociedade Portuguesa de Oftalmologia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Do not forget to download the Authorship responsibility statement/Authorization for Publication and Conflict of Interest.
The article can only be submitted with these two documents.
To obtain the Authorship responsibility statement/Authorization for Publication file, click here.
To obtain the Conflict of Interest file, click here


