Network curriculum design? Relational dynamics of teachers’ associations in the design of Essential Learning in Portugal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21814/rpe.24086Keywords:
Teachers’ associations, Curriculum design, Curriculum policies, Network analysis, Teachers’ collaborationAbstract
The invitation extended by the Portuguese Ministry of Education to teachers’ associations (TAs), in 2016, to participate in the process of defining the Essential Learning (EL) is unparalleled in the Portuguese curriculum background, as in most countries in the world. In this text, we intend to understand the social structure and the interaction dynamics created by the TAs when drawing up the EL, answering the following research questions: (i) Which actors were invited by the TAs to join their teams, and what relationships did they establish with each other? (ii) Which relational dynamics did the associations of the various subject areas establish with each other?
The methodology used was the social network analysis (SNA), which allows us to visualise the structure of social relationships and their interaction patterns and represent them graphically. We developed a network analysis questionnaire and applied it to the 18 TAs that drafted the EL.
The results show that the TAs formed teams were composed mainly of experts in the subject area. TAs have a social representation of professional knowledge that underestimates curriculum expertise. Furthermore, there was little collaboration between associations in the design of the EL, which can be justified by the tradition of the Portuguese education system before the 25th April Revolution, based on teacher’s individual work, and by the origin or subject-based culture of the TAs.
Downloads
References
Abrantes, P. (1994). Associações pedagógicas de professores. In J. C. Abrantes (Eds.), A outra face da escola (pp. 691-707). Ministério da Educação.
Apple, M. (2019). Ideology and curriculum. Routledge.
Baş, G., & Şentürk, C. (2019). Teachers’ voice: Teacher participation in curriculum development process. Inquiry in Education, 11(1), 5. https://digitalcommons.nl.edu/ie/vol11/iss1/5/
Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories. SRHE & Open University Press.
Borgatti, S. P., & Molina, J. L. (2005). Toward ethical guidelines for network research in Organisations. Social Networks, 27(2), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2005.01.004
Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes. Harvard University Press.
Carl, A. (2005). The “voice of the teacher” in curriculum development: A voice crying in the wilderness. South African Journal of Education, 25(4), 223-228.
Cross, R., & Parker (2004). The hidden power of social networks – Understanding how work really gets done in organisations. Harvard Business School Press.
Day, C. (2004). A paixão pelo ensino. Porto Editora.
Decree-law No. 5/73, of 25 July. Estabelece a gratuitidade do ensino em oito anos. https://files.dre.pt/1s/1973/10/24000/18311831.pdf
Decree-law No. 6/2001, of 18 January. Aprova a reorganização curricular do ensino básico. https://files.dre.pt/1s/2001/01/015a00/02580265.pdf
Doll, R. C. (1995). Curriculum improvement: Decision making and process. Allyn & Bacon.
Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. Teachers College Press.
Hadar, L., & Brody, D. (2010). From isolation to symphonic harmony: Building a professional development community among teacher educator. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1641-1651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.015
Handelzalts, A. (2009). Collaborative curriculum design in teacher design teams. University of Twente.
Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society. Education in the age of insecurity. Teachers College Press.
Hoogveld, A. W. M. (2003). The teacher as designer of competency-based education. Open University the Netherlands.
Lieberman, A. (1996). Practices that support teacher development. Transforming conceptions of professional learning. In M. W. McLaughlin & I. Oberman (Eds.), Teacher learning: New policies, new practices (pp. 185-201). Teachers College Press.
Little, J. W. (2002). Locating learning in teachers’ communities of practice: Opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 917-946. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00052-5
Normand, R., & Derouet, J.-L. (2011). Évaluation, développement professionnel et organisation scolaire. Revue Française de Pédagogie, 174, 5-20. https://doi.org/10.4000/rfp.2899
Oloruntegbe, K. O., Duyilemi, A. N., Agbayewa, J. O., Oluwatelure, T. A., Dele, A., & Omoniyi, M. B. I. (2010). Teachers’ involvement, commitment and innovativeness in curriculum development and implementation. Educational Research, 1(12), 706-712. https://www.interesjournals.org/articles/teachers-involvement-commitment-andinnovativeness-in-curriculum-development-andimplementation.pdf
Order No. 6478/2017, of 26 July. Perfil dos alunos à saída da escolaridade obrigatória. http://www.dge.mec.pt/sites/default/files/Legislacao/2017_despacho_64.pdf
Order No. 6605-A/2021, of 6 July. Procede à definição dos referenciais curriculares das várias dimensões do desenvolvimento curricular, incluindo a avaliação externa. https://dre.pt/dre/detalhe/despacho/6605-a-2021-166512681
Order No. 6944-A/2018, of 19 July, Attachments I to III of Decree-law No. 55/2018, of 6 July. Aprendizagens essenciais do ensino básico (1.º, 2.º e 3.º ciclos). https://files.dre.pt/2s/2018/07/138000001/0000200002.pdf
Pintassilgo, J., & Pedro, L. (2013). Associativismo docente. In M. F. Rollo (Ed.). Dicionário de História da I República e do Republicanismo (pp. 320-323). Assembleia da República.
Roldão, M. C., Peralta, H., & Martins, I. (2017). Currículo do ensino básico e do ensino secundário. Para a construção de aprendizagens essenciais baseadas no perfil dos alunos (Documento de trabalho – Escolas do PAFC).
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Temple Smith.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-21. https://people.ucsc.edu/~ktellez/shulman.pdf
Voogt, J. M., Pieters, J. M., & Handelzalts, A. (2016). Teacher collaboration in curriculum design teams: Effects, mechanisms, and conditions. Educational Research and Evaluation, 22(3-4), 121-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2016.1247725
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393, 440-442. https://doi.org/10.1038/30918
Young, J. H. (1990). Teacher participation in curriculum development: A study of societal and institutional levels. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 36(2), 141-156.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sílvia Almeida, Joana Viana, Natália Barcelos, Maria do Céu Roldão, Helena Peralta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. The authors preserve their authorship and grant the Portuguese Journal of Education the right to the first publication. The work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License that allows sharing the work with the acknowledgment of initial authorship and publication in this Journal.
2. The authors have the right to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the published version of their work (e.g. to deposit in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), acknowledging the initial authorship and publication in this Journal.
3. The authors have the permission and are stimulated to post their work online (e.g. in an institutional repository or on their personal website). They can do this at any phase of the editorial process, as it may generate productive changes, as well as increase impact and article citation (see The Open Citation Project).
The work is licensed under Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
