Good practices in the pre-analytical phase of blood cultures: a quasi-experimental study in an emergency department

Authors

  • Tânia Baptista Instituto Politécnico de Leiria, Escola Superior de Saúde, Leiria, Portugal | Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, E.P.E., Coimbra, Portugal https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6234-9482
  • Joana Sousa Instituto Politécnico de Leiria, Escola Superior de Saúde, Leiria, Portugal | Center for Innovative Care and Health Technology (ciTechCare), Leiria, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5515-0696

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0214e.31247

Keywords:

blood culture; contamination; nurse; knowledge

Abstract

Introduction: Blood culture unequivocally identifies the microorganism responsible for bloodstream infections. The diagnostic value of blood culture depends on the quality of each moment of the pre-analytical phase, with full compliance with recommended best practices being essential. The nurse must implement the most current evidence-based recommendations to avoid external contamination of the sample and to obtain a contamination rate of less than 3%.

Objective: To analyse the impact of a training intervention on nurses' knowledge and practice of the pre-analytical phase of blood cultures.

Methods: This study follows a quasi-experimental, prospective and longitudinal methodology, through the application of a knowledge assessment questionnaire, based on a narrative search of the literature, the elaboration of a training plan and the construction of a Specific Procedure. The knowledge assessment questionnaire was administered to nurses in two stages - before and after training.

Results: Sixty percent of the nurses in an Emergency Department of a hospital in central Portugal participated in the study, constituting a convenience non-probabilistic sample. Participants answered 60.4% of questions correctly before the intervention, increasing to 78.3% two months after. A positive change was observed in all questions, with 67.4% of the sample showing increased knowledge. The blood culture contamination rate reached 12.1% two months before the intervention, with no reduction after the intervention.

Conclusion: Nurses' knowledge improved after in-service training and the implementation of a specific procedure (p<0.001). However, there was no reduction in the contamination rate, indicating resistance to changes in behaviour. It is necessary to maintain educational intervention and add other strategies appropriate to the team's characteristics to reduce the blood culture contamination rate effectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Araújo, M. R. E. (2012). Hemocultura: recomendações de coleta, processamento e interpretação dos resultados. J Infect Control 2, 1 (1), 8-19. http://jic-abih.com.br/index.php/jic/article/viewFile/12/11

Cheng, M. P., Stenstrom, R., Paquerre, K., Stabler, S. N., Akhter, M., Davidson, A. C., Gavric, M., Lawandi, A., Jinah, R., Saeed, Z., Demir, K., Huang, K., Mahpour, A., Shamatutu, C., Caya, C., Troquet, J., Clark, G., Yansouni, C., & Sweet, D. (2019). Blood Culture Results Before and After Antimicrobial Administration in Patients With Severe Manifestations of Sepsis. Annals of Internal Medicine, 171 (8), 547-554. https://doi.org/10.7326/M19-1696

Choi, J., Enfasi, S., Chartier, L. B. & Praet, O. V. (2017). A Quality Improvement Initiative to Decrease the Rate of Solitary Blood Cultures in the Emergency Department. Academic Emergency Medicine, 24 (9), 1080-1087. http://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13161

Dargère, S., Cormier, H. & Verdon, R. (2018). Contaminants in blood cultures: importance, implications, interpretation and prevention. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 24 (9), 964-969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2018.03.030

Direção-Geral da Saúde. (2017). Norma nº 010/2016 de 30/09/2016, atualizada a 16/05/2017. Via Verde Sépsis no Adulto. http://nocs.pt/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/i023642.pdf

Direção-Geral da Saúde. (2019). Norma nº 007/2019 de 16/02/2019. Higiene das Mãos nas Unidade de Saúde. https://normas.dgs.min-saude.pt/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/higiene-das-maos-nas-unidades-de-saude.pdf

Doern, G. V., Carroll, K. C., Diekema, D. J., Garey, K. W., Rupp, M. E., Weinstein, M. P., & Sexton, D. J. (2019). Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: A Comprehensive Update on the Problem of Blood Culture Contamination and a Discussion of Methods for addressing the Problem. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 33 (1), e00009-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00009-19

European Center for Disease Prevention and Control & World Health Organization. (2022). Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Europe 2022 -2020 data. Publications Office of the European Union (Ed.). http://doi.org/10.2900/112339

Grupo de Coordenação Local - Programa de Prevenção e Controlo de Infeções e de Resistência aos Antimicrobianos. (2021). Hemoculturas no diagnóstico de infeção. Boletim CIRA, 1 (11). http://www.chlc.min-saude.pt/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2021/10/CIRA-Setembro.pdf

Gunvanti, R., Lakshmi, J. T., Ariyanachi, K., Saranya, M., Kamlakar, S., Sakthivadivel, V., Gaur, A., Nikhat, S. S., Sagar, T., Chenna, K. & Vidya, M. S. (2022). Blood Culture Contamination Rate as a Quality Indicator – a Prospective Observational Study. Maedica, 17 (2), pp. 311-316. https://doi.org/10.26574/maedica.2022.17.2.311

Kopsidas, I., Collins, M., & Zaoutis, T. (2021). Healthcare-associated Infections – Can We Do Better? The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 40 (8), e305-e309. http://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000003203

Lalezari, A., Cohen, M. J., Svinik, O., Oster, Y., Salameh, S. & Strahilevitz, J. (2019). A simplified blood culture sampling protocol for reducing contamination and costs: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 26 (4), 470-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2019.09.005

Lamy, B., Sundqvist, M., & Idelevich, E. A. (2019). Bloodstream infections – Standard and progress in pathogen diagnosis. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 26 (2), 142-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2019.11.017

Liaquat, S., Baccaglini, L., Haynatzki, G., Medcalf, S. J. & Rupp, M. E. (2021). Clinical consequences of contaminated blood cultures in adult hospitalized patients at an institution utilizing a rapid blood-culture identification system. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 42 (8), 978-984. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2020.1337

Long, B. & Koyfman, A. (2016). Best Clinical Practice: Blood Culture Utility in the Emergency Department. The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 51 (5), 529-539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.07.003

Magnolia Medical Technologies. (2022, May 05). Newly Released CLSI National Blood Culture Guidelines Identify Best Practices and Evidences-Based Technology Solutions Such as Steripath ® to Improve Patient Safety and Outcomes. https://magnolia-medical.com/news/newly-released-clsi-national-blood-culture-guidelines-identify-best-practices-and-evidence-based-technology-solutions-such-as-steripath-to-improve-patient-safety-and-outcomes/

McLeod, C. G.(2019). Reducing Blood Culture Contamination in the Emergency Department. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 35 (3), 245-251. http://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000441

Nielsen, L. E., Nguyen, K., Wahl, C. K., Huss, J. L., Chang, D., Ager, E. P. & Hamilton, L. (2021). Initial Specimen Diversion Device® reduces blood culture contamination and vancomycin use in academic medical center. The Journal of hospital infection, 120, 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHIN.2021.10.017

Ntusi, N., Aubin, L., Oliver, S., Whitelaw, A., & Mendelson, M. (2010). Guideline for the optimal use of blood cultures. South African Medical Journal, 100 (12), 839–843. https://doi.org/10.7196/samj.4217

Povroznik, M. D. (2022). Initial Specimen Diversion Device Utilization Mitigates Blood Culture Contamination Across Regional Community Hospital and Acute Care Facility. American Journal of Medical Quality, 37 (5), 405-412. http://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000055

Sacchetti, B., Travis, J., Steed, L. L. & Webb, G. (2022). Identification of the main contributors to blood culture contamination at a tertiary care academic medical center. Infection Prevention in Practice, 4 (3), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infpip.2022.100219

Shaji, R., Madigubba, H., Priyadarshi, K., Anandh, P., Nathan, B., Vivekanandan, M. & Sastry, A. S. (2022). Effectiveness of Multimodal Intervention to Improve Blood Culture Collection in the Emergency Department. Journal of Global Infectious Diseases, 14 (1), 10-16. http://doi.org/10.4103/jgid.jgid_138_21

Skoglund, E., Dempsey, C. J., Chen, H. & Garey, K. W. (2019). Estimated Clinical and Economic Impact through Use of a Novel Blood Collection Device To Reduce Blood Culture Contamination in the Emergency Department: a Cost-Benefit Analysis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 57 (1), e01015-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01015-18

Tenderenda, A., Lysakowska, M., Dargiewicz, R., & Gawron-Skarbek, A. (2022). Blood Culture Contamination: A Single General Hospital Experience of 2-Year Retrospective Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19 (5), 2-14. http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19053009

Timsit, J., Ruppé, E., Barbier, F., Tabah, A. & Bassetti, M. (2020). Bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: an expert statement. Intensive Care Medicine, 46, 266-284. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-05950-6

Towns, M. L., Jarvis, W. R., & Hsueh, P. (2010). Guidelines on Blood Cultures. Journal of Microbiology. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection, 43 (4), 347-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1684-1182(10)60054-0

Published

2024-02-29

How to Cite

Baptista, T., & Sousa, J. . (2024). Good practices in the pre-analytical phase of blood cultures: a quasi-experimental study in an emergency department. Millenium - Journal of Education, Technologies, and Health, (14e), e31247. https://doi.org/10.29352/mill0214e.31247

Issue

Section

Life and Healthcare Sciences