Language proficiency among immigrants and the establishment of interethnic relations: A comparative analysis of Bilbao, Lisbon and Rotterdam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18055/Finis3617Abstract
Despite the increasing interest in exploring language proficiency among immigrants as a quintessential element for their economic integration in the host country, less attention has been devoted to the social impacts that destination-language proficiency may have on enhancing interethnic contacts between immigrants and the native population. This research aims to shed light on this latter topic, discussing if being a native-speaker immigrant in the host country or, for those immigrants who are non-native speakers, having a stronger command of the destination-language may increase their likelihood of interacting with the native population. Moreover, we question if there are significant differences in the interaction patterns between these two groups and the natives, presenting the cities of Bilbao, Lisbon and Rotterdam as a territorial frame. The analysis is based on data gathered through the GEITONIES survey. The results obtained indicate that native-speaker immigrants generally tend to show more interaction with the natives. Nevertheless, for immigrants not sharing such cultural similarity, those with a higher level of second-language proficiency clearly show stronger bonds with the native population; in both cases this can also be related to individual, group or place related variables.Downloads
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
-
The opinions expressed in the texts submitted to Finisterra are the sole responsibility of the authors.
-
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to share the work with acknowledgement of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
-
Authors commit to following the “Submission Guidelines” available on the RCAAP platform.
-
Whenever the text requires changes based on suggestions from Scientific Reviewers and/or the Executive Editorial Board, authors agree to accept and implement these changes as requested. If there are changes the authors disagree with, appropriate justifications must be provided on a case-by-case basis.
-
Reproduction of copyrighted material has been previously authorised.
-
The texts are original, unpublished, and have not been submitted to other journals.
Copyright
It is the responsibility of the authors to obtain authorisation to publish any material subject to copyright.
Editing Rights
Editing rights belong to the Centre for Geographical Studies of the Institute of Geography and Spatial Planning, University of Lisbon.
The editing of a text submitted to Finisterra for publication implies that it is an original.
Publication implies acceptance of the submission guidelines and compliance with authors’ responsibilities.
Publication Rights
All publication rights belong to the Centre for Geographical Studies, as the publisher of Finisterra.
Licence URL: CC Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives (BY-NC-ND).
Digital Preservation Policy
Finisterra uses the Open Journal Systems (OJS 3.2.1.4), a free and open-source software for journal management and publication, developed and distributed by the Public Knowledge Project (PKP) under the GNU General Public License. PKP is a multi-university initiative that develops open-source software and conducts research to improve the quality and reach of scholarly publishing. OJS includes the PKP PN plugin, a means of digitally preserving journal content in the PKP Preservation Network (PKP PN), which ensures long-term access to OJS journal content. PKP enables OJS journal publishers to preserve content in a decentralised and distributed manner. This ensures that, in the event a journal ceases publication or goes offline, continued access to articles and issues remains available (long-term preservation).
For more information, visit: https://pkp.sfu.ca/ojs/
